User Controls

Global Surface Temperatures Are Rising Faster Now Than At Any Time In The Past 485 Million Years

  1. #61
    Removed, thought that was obbe having a dig.
  2. #62
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Agreed, along with all other humanity…as mentioned…

    No, just him
  3. #63
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Um your mistake is in saying suggesting I think any life "deserves" to exist at all…I've never said any such thing

    My feelings on that would be quite the opposite in fact.

    Your entire argument is that humans "need" to go because we don't contribute as much as, for example, penguins do. In other words, you believe penguins are more deserving of life on Earth than humans.
  4. #64
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker No, just him

  5. #65
    Originally posted by Obbe Your entire argument is that humans "need" to go because we don't contribute as much as, for example, penguins do. In other words, you believe penguins are more deserving of life on Earth than humans.

    No...common senses does not = "deserving".

    Common sense dictates if the existence of 1 species means the death of 100 species it makes COMMON SENSE for that 1 species to be removed.

    The old "bad apple in the barrel" analogy....one bad apple can ruin/destroy the rest.

    "Deserving" doesn't come into it...common sense does.
  6. #66
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Removed, thought that was obbe having a dig.

  7. #67
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    https://climateoutreach.org/reports/climate-change-faith/ #SeasonOfCreation
    https://seasonofcreation.org/resources/
    Earth care, a precious gift
    Narrative Arc
    1. We have been entrusted with the care of
    the Earth.
    2. Climate change is harming the Earth.
    3. We need to return to our appropriate
    relationship to it.
    4. By doing so we fulfill our responsibility
    and restore harmony.
    Keywords: gift, Creation, nature, living things, respect, responsibility, care, nurture,
    flourish, productivity
    For all faiths, caring for the natural world is a principle strongly embedded in texts and
    observance.
    Faith can be seen as a means of interpreting climate change:
    “Religion provides an amazing tool to talk about our deepest feelings in our relationship
    to nature.” (jedi workshop participant)
    The principle of the world being a gift that we have a responsibility to respect appears
    spontaneously in people’s language across faiths:
    “We should look after the world as something borrowed, given to us as a gift... so we
    should handle it in a very similar way.” (Hindu workshop participant)
    However... be careful with language
    Different faiths have very different ways of describing their relationship to the natural world
    so while the principle works across faiths, it is hard to find engaging language that can speak
    across all faiths, other than ‘gift’.
    Language about divine ‘Creation’ and the ‘productivity’ of the Earth works well with
    Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). For Hindus and Buddhists, however, the
    concept of ‘Creation’ or of a divine Creator is not at all central. For these traditions, language
    around the ‘natural world’ builds more effectively on their strong ethical responsibility for
    caring for all living things. However, referring to the ‘natural world’ is, in many cases, too weak
    for Christians and Muslims.
    “Language that speaks only of the ‘natural world’, with no indication that it might be God’s
    creation, is unlikely to excite and energise those from my tradition.” (Christian survey
    responder)
    The divine is all around us in all living things
    and in the abundance of the natural world.
    The natural world is a precious gift and
    caring for it is an act of worship.
    We have a sacred responsibility to care
    for the Earth and be its stewards.
    Photo: Ed Suominen (CC)
    7CLIMATE OUTREACH • Faith & Climate Change - A guide to talking with the five major faiths
    Climate change is a moral challenge
    Keywords: moral, care, love, harm, vulnerability, poor, born, unborn, ancestors
    All faiths contain sacred values condemning violence and harm to others (particularly for
    Hindus and Buddhists, this extends to all living things), being charitable, and protecting
    the vulnerable. Future generations are important to all faith groups. Climate change is
    a developing issue with no clear beginning or end, so this narrative places it within the
    intergenerational timeline of respect for both those who came before us and those yet
    unborn.
    However... be careful with language
    Be careful using the word ‘justice’. Justice is a complex concept with multiple meanings
    which will not work with all audiences. The word ‘justice’ has strong Abrahamic overtones and
    performed poorly with Hindu and Buddhist participants. Also, when applied to ‘social justice’
    for the poor, it has a left-wing resonance that may work poorly with people of conservative
    politics.
    Avoid ‘psychological distancing’. People often sub-consciously seek to disengage from
    the issue by viewing it as an issue affecting other people in other places.7 Language about
    harm to the vulnerable or future generations could create a false separation between ‘us’
    and the future ‘victims’ of climate change. So use the present tense (it is harming) rather
    than the future (it will harm). Language about impacts on other groups in other parts of the
    world, however sincere, can also enable people to distance it, so stress that climate change is
    already affecting everyone in our own communities and countries.
    Avoid arguments that inaction is wrong/evil. People of faith appear to regard inaction on
    climate change as ignorant or weak but not expressly sinful. Although they accepted the
    moral narrative that action is the right thing to do, most workshop participants also rejected
    the opposite language: that inaction on climate change is wrong or distances us from God
  8. #68
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Obbe

  9. #69
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No…common senses does not = "deserving".

    Common sense dictates if the existence of 1 species means the death of 100 species it makes COMMON SENSE for that 1 species to be removed.

    The old "bad apple in the barrel" analogy….one bad apple can ruin/destroy the rest.

    "Deserving" doesn't come into it…common sense does.

    Again, there is no "need" to remove the bad apple from the barrel. Who cares if it destroys the rest? The world is the way it is, and there is no need for it to be any other way.
  10. #70
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood https://climateoutreach.org/reports/climate-change-faith/ #SeasonOfCreation
    https://seasonofcreation.org/resources/
    Earth care, a precious gift
    Narrative Arc
    1. We have been entrusted with the care of
    the Earth.
    2. Climate change is harming the Earth.
    3. We need to return to our appropriate
    relationship to it.
    4. By doing so we fulfill our responsibility
    and restore harmony.
    Keywords: gift, Creation, nature, living things, respect, responsibility, care, nurture,
    flourish, productivity
    For all faiths, caring for the natural world is a principle strongly embedded in texts and
    observance.
    Faith can be seen as a means of interpreting climate change:
    “Religion provides an amazing tool to talk about our deepest feelings in our relationship
    to nature.” (jedi workshop participant)
    The principle of the world being a gift that we have a responsibility to respect appears
    spontaneously in people’s language across faiths:
    “We should look after the world as something borrowed, given to us as a gift… so we
    should handle it in a very similar way.” (Hindu workshop participant)
    However… be careful with language
    Different faiths have very different ways of describing their relationship to the natural world
    so while the principle works across faiths, it is hard to find engaging language that can speak
    across all faiths, other than ‘gift’.
    Language about divine ‘Creation’ and the ‘productivity’ of the Earth works well with
    Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam). For Hindus and Buddhists, however, the
    concept of ‘Creation’ or of a divine Creator is not at all central. For these traditions, language
    around the ‘natural world’ builds more effectively on their strong ethical responsibility for
    caring for all living things. However, referring to the ‘natural world’ is, in many cases, too weak
    for Christians and Muslims.
    “Language that speaks only of the ‘natural world’, with no indication that it might be God’s
    creation, is unlikely to excite and energise those from my tradition.” (Christian survey
    responder)
    The divine is all around us in all living things
    and in the abundance of the natural world.
    The natural world is a precious gift and
    caring for it is an act of worship.
    We have a sacred responsibility to care
    for the Earth and be its stewards.
    Photo: Ed Suominen (CC)
    7CLIMATE OUTREACH • Faith & Climate Change - A guide to talking with the five major faiths
    Climate change is a moral challenge
    Keywords: moral, care, love, harm, vulnerability, poor, born, unborn, ancestors
    All faiths contain sacred values condemning violence and harm to others (particularly for
    Hindus and Buddhists, this extends to all living things), being charitable, and protecting
    the vulnerable. Future generations are important to all faith groups. Climate change is
    a developing issue with no clear beginning or end, so this narrative places it within the
    intergenerational timeline of respect for both those who came before us and those yet
    unborn.
    However… be careful with language
    Be careful using the word ‘justice’. Justice is a complex concept with multiple meanings
    which will not work with all audiences. The word ‘justice’ has strong Abrahamic overtones and
    performed poorly with Hindu and Buddhist participants. Also, when applied to ‘social justice’
    for the poor, it has a left-wing resonance that may work poorly with people of conservative
    politics.
    Avoid ‘psychological distancing’. People often sub-consciously seek to disengage from
    the issue by viewing it as an issue affecting other people in other places.7 Language about
    harm to the vulnerable or future generations could create a false separation between ‘us’
    and the future ‘victims’ of climate change. So use the present tense (it is harming) rather
    than the future (it will harm). Language about impacts on other groups in other parts of the
    world, however sincere, can also enable people to distance it, so stress that climate change is
    already affecting everyone in our own communities and countries.
    Avoid arguments that inaction is wrong/evil. People of faith appear to regard inaction on
    climate change as ignorant or weak but not expressly sinful. Although they accepted the
    moral narrative that action is the right thing to do, most workshop participants also rejected
    the opposite language: that inaction on climate change is wrong or distances us from God

    Uh oh, Mr Copy/paste showed up.
  11. #71
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    I'm just sharing in the joy of love to our plant and the season of creation as per instructions on the season of creation website itself #SeasonOfCreation click here to share on social media!
    https://lutheranworld.org/resources/publication-season-creation-celebration-guide-2024
  12. #72
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    based
  13. #73
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Obbe "It is a statement of fact, we cannot be any more certain; it is unequivocal and indisputable that humans are warming the planet."
  14. #74
    Originally posted by Obbe Again, there is no "need" to remove the bad apple from the barrel. Who cares if it destroys the rest? The world is the way it is, and there is no need for it to be any other way.

    Again? You said "deserve" now you've change it to "need"...not the same thing...you're playing word games.

    There is a natural order to the universe, physics, chemistry and biology etc...these have "rules" (rules in the sense that humans can understand and talk about them...not rules as in someone made a decision).

    The "rule" of life is that it survives and flourishes (as far as our tiny human minds can again, understand and communicate it). This is one of the great unknowns...is it by intelligent design or just "dumb luck"...my feeling is the latter. Evolution is a good example of "dumb luck"...many branches of life on Earth have been tried and the VAST majority have failed.

    99% of all species that ever lived are already extinct...that points to dumb luck rather than intelligent design. So no one species "deserves" or "needs" to live...the apple doesn't "need" to be removed from the barrel...but if the intent is for life to thrive then it's in the interests of the "apples" that the bad one be removed.

    ETA: Humans being the bad apple in the barrel of life on Earth.
  15. #75
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson …the apple doesn't "need" to be removed from the barrel…but if the intent is for life to thrive then it's in the interests of the "apples" that the bad one be removed.

    But nobody is intending that.
  16. #76
    Originally posted by Obbe But nobody is intending that.

    Correct "nobody" is...the laws of science isn't a "body".
  17. #77
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    it's the season of creation maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan
    🌳🌿☘🏞️🍃🏕️🌲☁️🍀🌱🐛🍂🍄🪵🦋🌸☀️⛺🍁🪓🌙🪲🦗🌧🐜🐞🐿️🦔🐍✿🪶🕸️🔥
    ♻️🌱🌍🔋🌱🌍♻️
    🌿name:
    🌱age:
    🍃gender:
    ☘️pronouns:
    🌍nationality:
    📟zodiac:
    ♻️🌱🌍🔋🌱🌍♻️
    [optional]
    🧩timezone:
    💚hobbies:
    🏝️sexuality:
    🥬boundaries:
    ♻️dni:
    🔋dm status:
    ✎extra:
    ♻️🌱🌍🔋🌱🌍♻️
  18. #78
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Correct "nobody" is…the laws of science isn't a "body".

    "Science" is also not intending anything. Science doesn't care if the whole barrel goes rotten.
  19. #79
    Originally posted by Obbe Climate change accelerated by human activity is our reality.

    Says a bunch of political kooks with no evidence to support the claim.
  20. #80
    Originally posted by Obbe "Science" is also not intending anything. Science doesn't care if the whole barrel goes rotten.

    Source?

    But again, science has "laws"...it doesn't need a consciousness for those laws to be in place and followed.
Jump to Top