User Controls
Hebephilia thread
-
2024-09-22 at 6:27 PM UTCThread for all the hebephile rants wariat or other hebephiles want. Only nonce ages 11-16, anything below is pedophilia and not allowed, anything above is normal and not allowedThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-22 at 6:27 PM UTCOh boy i love young teen kids
-
2024-09-22 at 6:29 PM UTC
-
2024-09-22 at 6:30 PM UTCNot good. What's fox up to?
-
2024-09-22 at 6:30 PM UTCbradley is a fag… he likes dick only.
-
2024-09-22 at 6:33 PM UTC
-
2024-09-22 at 6:34 PM UTC
-
2024-09-22 at 6:37 PM UTCIm a teen girl who loves old men, so I believe hebephilia is normal. Pedophilia isnt though, kinda weird since theyre too young to understand anything
-
2024-09-22 at 6:38 PM UTC
-
2024-09-22 at 7:36 PM UTCwhy doenst bradley believe hepbephilia is normal doe?
-
2024-09-22 at 7:40 PM UTC
-
2024-09-22 at 7:44 PM UTCYeah its not ok to have sex with dogs, but children 13+ can consent, sometimes younger than 13 can consent too, depends on maturity and intelligence. Hebephilia is normal, if a teen wants to have sex with an old guy or wants to date an old guy they should be able toThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-22 at 8:19 PM UTCI agree.
-
2024-09-22 at 8:21 PM UTC…The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-22 at 8:21 PM UTC…The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-22 at 8:35 PM UTCWhat did you post
-
2024-09-22 at 8:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Warcry why doenst bradley believe hepbephilia is normal doe?
I don't think it exists. Debate me
https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor.htmla morally negative evaluation of such acts fails to take into adequate consideration both man's character as a rational and free being and the cultural conditioning of all moral norms. In their view, man, as a rational being, not only can but actually must freely determine the meaning of his behaviour. This process of "determining the meaning" would obviously have to take into account the many limitations of the human being, as existing in a body and in history. Furthermore, it would have to take into consideration the behavioural models and the meanings which the latter acquire in any given culture. Above all, it would have to respect the fundamental commandment of love of God and neighbour. Still, they continue, God made man as a rationally free being; he left him "in the power of his own counsel" and he expects him to shape his life in a personal and rational way. Love of neighbour would mean above all and even exclusively respect for his freedom to make his own decisions. The workings of typically human behaviour, as well as the so-called "natural inclinations", would establish at the most — so they say — a general orientation towards correct behaviour, but they cannot determine the moral assessment of individual human acts, so complex from the viewpoint of situations.
"natural inclinations," which refers to the idea that human beings have certain innate tendencies toward behaviors that are generally considered good or morally right (such as self-preservation or reproduction).
not all desires are good just because they exist. Reason is given to humans to help them discern and reject desires that are harmful or disordered. Even if someone experiences a powerful desire, they are morally responsible to control and direct their actions toward what is good and just, which in this case means not acting on disordered desires."
I don't think anyone should identify as a "philia" type anything for any reason as it goes against natural human dignity to diminish love and sex into scientific ideas created by perverted greek leftists or somethingIdentifying as a "philia" type person is, in a sense, accepting or normalizing a disordered desire, even if one claims they’re not acting on it.
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20240402_dignitas-infinita_en.html
there is nothing wrong according to the law of man or God about chasing of age 16 year old girls in Polane. You are only sinning by not marrying and impregnating them.
Originally posted by Sophie You don't realize that you're yelling into the void. By reason of your inferior tactical manner in conveying your objections and lack of creativity to think of better ways, caused by a general lack of intelligence, you try to muster weak 'insults' in an attempt to feel better about the fact that anyone who doesn't share your confirmation bias with regards to this topic is unimpressed by your placid bad faith criticisms. Calling me a pedophile is a statement of fact, truth doesn't offend me you see.
Since you're suffering from a terminal case of myopia you fail to understand nuances in personality that influence how people act and how they deal with the moral quandaries that come with pedophilia or any other 'philia' on the chronophile spectrum. Here's an insult because you're so fond of them: I don't blame you for your failure to understand many things, your ancestors come from Pakistan. It is to be expected from a people who's average IQ works out to around a standard deviation below the average IQ of my people. If you don't feel offended, good. You shouldn't feel offended by statements of fact.
Originally posted by Sophie That's a nice portmanteau. Although it could be argued all philias as it were have to do with the aesthetic of the object of desire.
Originally posted by Wariat no Im not shopping im using the actual definitions not dictionary shorthand definitions which you are using. philia or philias such terms are clinical hence they created the definition originally and why they should be used as source not some one liner definitions thwt dont even go into explanations you are using.
-
2024-09-23 at 2:02 AM UTCBradley debate me and scorn pls tell me how the above is wrong or right or ur thoughts on it?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-23 at 2:07 AM UTCHe’s gonna come back with a one liner how he hasn’t read any of the above and thinks everyone who even looks at a 17 yr old is a pedo.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-09-23 at 2:07 AM UTCBur hes gay he’s just gay…The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
