User Controls

Stopping nuclear warming

  1. #21
    Originally posted by Donald Trump You can already buy sodium ion batteries on ali express. I haven't played around with them yet, but they should be an amazing technology as sodium is easily extracted from salt.

    thanks.

    but how do i tell if theyre genuine sodium batteries or li-ion batteries identifying as sodium batteries.
  2. #22
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Donald Trump You can already buy sodium ion batteries on ali express. I haven't played around with them yet, but they should be an amazing technology as sodium is easily extracted from salt.

    sodium and lithium are basically the same thing. I think China just can't mine Lithium so they use Sodium instead.

  3. #23
    Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina thanks.

    but how do i tell if theyre genuine sodium batteries or li-ion batteries identifying as sodium batteries.

    Different nominal voltage and internal resistance.
  4. #24
    Kingoftoes Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by Elbow Also if you're worried about climate change it's silly to hate nuclear. Nuclear is great for the climate. Mostly because it's not fossil fuels. And if the climate's your concern, who cares if it's more expensive than coal? The only emissions you gotta worry about with nuclear are the CO2 released from the concrete as it cures during construction, which is basically a problem for any large modern infrastructure project. It has all of the upsides of fossil fuels without any of the emissions downsides. Dead simple too. Hot rock make water boil.

    Burning coal and natural gas/oil is also far, far more polluting than nuclear. Like, orders of magnitude worse for people's health historically speaking. Just awful. Nuclear doesn't contaminate anything outside of disaster scenarios, and we shouldn't let the problems retarded soviets predictably ran into dissuade us. It's a technology we should be far more interested in developing than we are as a species, and especially as a society. 😤

    Burning fossil fuels flings carcinogens into the environment and atmosphere.

    Nuclear doesn't.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. #25
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Cowboy2013 There have been tests around these things showing tritium levels higher the closer you get to them along with corresponding lung cancer rates and other things. Of course these aren't popular anymore. You probably can't post about them anywhere on social media without it being shadowbanned or refuted by fact checking bots with no facts.

    In recent history it was mainstream to talk about how bad nuclear power was. There was a satirical commercial in GTA San Andreas. And I watched a 2012 movie called Night Moves where some environmentalist fucktards blew up a hydroelectric dam and one of the older environmentalists was wondering what kind of fucktard would do this when it would just be replaced by something worse like a nuclear reactor.

    But it's a new day and now we can't say this because we're thinking about profits for energy companies now.

    The data says otherwise about tritium, I don't know what you're talking about.

    I live a lot closer to nuclear power plants in the east coast, many of them out here and I have never been exposed to any risk. When I lived in the west coast the place I lived was very low sea level and had radon gas naturally in the ground and some houses had to have radon detectors, I probably had a higher dose from that in my lifetime than camping in Pripyat. Nuclear is generally extremely safe, your data is extremely flawed and misunderstood.

    pre ww2 era nuclear research had almost zero safety standards because it was considered to be impossible for anything dangerous to occur at such small scale reactions

    Originally posted by The Self Taught Man I have literally been saying all year that we should all pitch in and work on clandestine space stations I even outlined my contributions with survival discussion, fusion generator rocket time line schematics, underwater durability domes, investor profiles, potential launch sites and I even gutted my old house and attempted to turn a wood stove and water heater into a clandestine space rocket. My power got cut off because I didn't pay it so I simply hacked the line and ran the house on a copper wire hack the width of my thumb. I burned the fucking house down BTW and almost caught an arson charge. Lost a good meth pipe and a pancake syrup warmer and like $300 of insulated copper.

    And you all just blow me off like "oh he's clearly smoking dangerous amounts of pure meth and has lost his damn mind" even though I ran out of my 2gram supply sometime before the house fire in mid NOVEMBER 2015 and haven't done any hard drugs since my house exploded.

    You people think I'm fucking joking about the clandestine space stations and think I'm making it up when I say I can build a CHICAGO PILE NUCLEAR REACTOR clandestinely like Enrico Fermi.

    all i c an zay is its not my fault . i got put in a mental hospital christmas 2014 for my meth abuse and when i got there i noticed a book. This book is where i learned most of what i preach today. Im convinced God or the shadow people servents of meth lord shabu placed that book there so that i could be awakeded to THE NUCLEAR FUSSION TRUTH

  6. #26
    Originally posted by Donald Trump Different nominal voltage and internal resistance.

    you mean trannies or batteries
  7. #27
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Source?

    Nuclear Energy is the safest/cleanest form of energy. There is no denying this

    False, the safest cleanest form of energy is photosynthesis.
  8. #28
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson False, the safest cleanest form of energy is photosynthesis.

    photosynthesises get their energy from the sun, which get its energy from nuclear fissions.
  9. #29
    Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina photosynthesises get their energy from the sun, which get its energy from nuclear fissions.




    The sun uses nuclear fusion...not fission...stay in school kid.
Jump to Top