User Controls

18 Ohio Woman suicides but boarded her BF and Friend instead

  1. #1
    Lanny Lanny African Astronaut
    She lives, Boyfriend and Friend 'board the bus' instead.

    Young Gal wanted to murder suicide but just murdered instead. she was 17 when she did it but arrested at 18 and charged as an adult.

    she killed 2 guys but got x4 murders (not sure how that works.. double murder charges per victim?) making her a mass murderer because of double charges each (Since she chose not to go with a jury and allow the judge panel to decide her outcome)

    you can also watch it on YouTube. "Parents Discover their daughter is a Mass Killer"

    I'm confused because I didn't know you can get 4 murders out of two deaths.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12546707/Mackenzie-Shirilla-remorseless-bully-murdered-son-Davion-Flanagans-parents-speak-against-hell-wheels-driver-say-not-apologized-horror-crash.html#:~:text=Davion%20Flanagan%2C%2019%2C%20died%20on,the%20car%2C%20and%20presumably%20herself.
  2. #2
    Lanny Lanny African Astronaut
    its also weird because for centuries killing an unborn child if you killed the mother while carrying isn't a double murder but 2 murders can turn into different levels of murder and manslaughter at the same time.

    crazy American laws
  3. #3
    When you murder someone, you're guilty of murder charges at both the state and federal levels, so they just combine all the charges by doubling them.
  4. #4
    Lanny Lanny African Astronaut
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ When you murder someone, you're guilty of murder charges at both the state and federal levels, so they just combine all the charges by doubling them.

    No that Judge didn't give down sentencing for both federal and state. she can only give at a state level. so it was x4 murder and a bunch of other shit.
  5. #5
    Originally posted by Lanny Lanny No that Judge didn't give down sentencing for both federal and state. she can only give at a state level. so it was x4 murder and a bunch of other shit.

    The state judge has jurisdiction at the federal level. Proof of that fact is them using a never-before-used federal statute to prosecute Trump, using a state prosecutor to prosecute.
  6. #6
    Lanny Lanny African Astronaut
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The state judge has jurisdiction at the federal level. Proof of that fact is them using a never-before-used federal statute to prosecute Trump, using a state prosecutor to prosecute.

    that's why it might be thrown out. that was insane what happened. Leftoids are just making shit up as they go along. using questionable methods to abuse power.

    NYC has become North Korea. they want to throw him in prison over it for life.
  7. #7
    When Enron destroyed records in anticipation of a major investigation, congress created a law regarding the destruction of those records. It was only intended to be used to corner Enron, but they used it on Trump. No other person or company in US history has been the subject of this law, yet they still went ahead and used it on Trump.
  8. #8
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    what a hero 😢
  9. #9
    Elbow African Astronaut
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ When you murder someone, you're guilty of murder charges at both the state and federal levels, so they just combine all the charges by doubling them.

    I think it's just that second degree murder is first degree murder without premeditation, and if you're articulating a case for first degree murder it stands to reason you are also capable of articulating the case for the lesser charge. I'm assuming she was charged with both as separate charges (I believe the Rittenhouse case was handled similarly), but I agree it's weird if you can be found guilty of both - although it is technically true that to be guilty of first degree murder you must also necessarily be guilty of second degree murder, it kinda feels like double jeopardy at that point.
  10. #10
    Originally posted by Elbow I think it's just that second degree murder is first degree murder without premeditation, and if you're articulating a case for first degree murder it stands to reason you are also capable of articulating the case for the lesser charge. I'm assuming she was charged with both as separate charges (I believe the Rittenhouse case was handled similarly), but I agree it's weird if you can be found guilty of both - although it is technically true that to be guilty of first degree murder you must also necessarily be guilty of second degree murder, it kinda feels like double jeopardy at that point.

    But second degree murder is not in the charges. It's double first degree for one murder.
Jump to Top