User Controls

If People tried to start America today they would be arrested by the world powers and all killed

  1. #1
    Ghost Black Hole
    How does that make you feel, LIKE A SLAVE????

    Imagine if a bunch of people went to another COUNTRY and decided to just call it their own place wow sounds like ISIS

    https://www.vice.com/en/article/jmbwbp/white-colony-in-namibia-773

    If you're white, racist and fed up with the grinding oppression of living in the West, where you're forced to rub shoulders with a small proportion of people who are not the same race as you, there's a new solution: move to Africa.

    That's according to plans made by the users of one thread on 8chan—a cesspit for people who are too uninhibited in their internet vulgarity even for 4chan.

    Here's how forum user "Kommandant" began his call for his white supremacist mates to join forces with him and create a new neo-Nazi utopia in Namibia [all sic]:
    Advertisement

    I just want to start by saying that no feat is too great, no task too arduous when done for the love of ones clan and ones blood. I have a hope for this future to prevail. And I know you can all see it too. It's an ember, but with just the right amount of breath it can become a raging fire. And all of Africa will see its beautiful glow in the night sky. Call it south West Africa, call it Rhodesia, Call it whatever you want.

    In today's global landscape, the term "terrorism" evokes images of violence, fear, and political instability. It's a label applied swiftly and decisively by world powers to those who challenge the status quo. But what if we rewound history and looked at the birth of America through a contemporary lens? Would the founding fathers be hailed as heroes or labeled as terrorists?

    The irony is stark: If the events of the American Revolution were to unfold in today's world, it's highly probable that the revolutionaries would be branded as terrorists and swiftly dealt with by the very powers they sought to oppose.

    Imagine this scenario: A group of colonists, disgruntled by oppressive taxation, lack of representation, and stifling regulations, decide to take matters into their own hands. They organize themselves into militias, engage in acts of sabotage against government property, and openly defy the authority of the ruling regime. Their ultimate goal? To break free from the yoke of tyranny and establish a new nation founded on principles of liberty and democracy.

    In the eyes of modern geopolitics, such actions would undoubtedly be condemned as acts of terrorism. The use of violence to achieve political ends, the targeting of symbols of state authority, and the disruption of public order would all be considered hallmarks of terrorism.

    Moreover, the very act of secession itself would likely be deemed illegal under international law. The concept of national sovereignty and territorial integrity is fiercely guarded by the global community, and any attempt to unilaterally declare independence would be met with staunch opposition from the world's superpowers.

    In this hypothetical scenario, the founding fathers would find themselves branded as outlaws, hunted down by the military forces of the British Empire and its allies. Instead of being celebrated as patriots and visionaries, they would be vilified as extremists and agitators.

    But here's the twist: If the events of the American Revolution had unfolded in such a manner, we might still be living under British rule today. The very principles of liberty, democracy, and self-determination that we hold dear would have been stifled in their infancy, crushed under the boot heel of imperial authority.

    This raises an important question: Are the actions of the founding fathers inherently justified simply because they led to the creation of a prosperous and free nation? Or are they only seen as such because history has deemed them victorious?

    The irony of America's birth lies in the fact that the very actions that laid the foundation for our nation's independence would be condemned as terrorism if they were to occur today. It serves as a reminder that the labels we attach to historical events are often subjective and contingent upon the prevailing political climate.

    Moreover, it underscores the complexities of power and authority in the modern world. While the United States champions the principles of liberty and democracy on the global stage, it also wields immense power and influence, often to the detriment of smaller nations and marginalized groups.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. #2
    EduCaTional CATastropHE African Astronaut
    I mean it did spark an actual war
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. #3
    infinityshock Black Hole
    Controlled opposition

    It's an idiotic idea and the idiot that came up with it is a paid shill
  4. #4
    Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by infinityshock Controlled opposition

    It's an idiotic idea and the idiot that came up with it is a paid shill

    I know him actually and the failure of that project ruined him, the only silver lining was that cancel culture didn't really exist in full force 9 years ago and his identity didn't get spewed all over the internet so his antics are mostly forgotten to history
  5. #5
    Bradley Black Hole
    Is it free? Do they got welfare? How frowned upon will gangster rap, malt liquor, and saying 'nigga' be in this new utopia?
  6. #6
    Bradley Black Hole
    I am interested
  7. #7
    Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by Bradley Is it free? Do they got welfare? How frowned upon will gangster rap, malt liquor, and saying 'nigga' be in this new utopia?

    Yes there's welfare but not through the government. You can only get it by going to church
  8. #8
    Bradley Black Hole
    Can I get it from going to the Mosque?
  9. #9
    Ghost Black Hole
    Probably. I don't really know how Islamic Banking works



    Originally posted by Ghost new hustle: Giving someone iftar as charity is like +100 paradise points in islam. I'm gonna convert to islam in a few days and start mendicant begging for iftar outside shawarma places after sundown

    i'm gonna eat like a fucking king

    I do know that their religion gives bonus points for alms. People see being a peasant as wrong or bad in the modern secular world but in ancient times when everyone believed in God, the poor were the easiest way for you to gain religious XP by giving some bread to a street beggar. Now they all just want crack and nobody wants to help them because even the poor are corrupt and brainwashed by the MACHINE


    That's why everyone virtue signals and gives to charity and the kids in africa because you feel better doing that than helping some ungrateful local yokel drug attic piece of shit, there are no "honest beggars" anymore. I believe this is because society has become too secularized by hebrews
  10. #10
    Warcry African Astronaut
    the powers that be who the ultras are fighting.
  11. #11
    Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by Warcry the powers that be who the ultras are fighting.

    ultranationalists aren't fighting anything except people against nationalism. If nationalists had their way the system would look almost identical, function exactly the same but it would be slightly more decentralized global power which is how things USED to be so it would be an incremental step backwards that could only work if these countries all had high tariffs and NON global free trade and were instead ultra competitive

    centralized power is easily defeated by technology so it would just turn into pre UN empire collapsing and people would cry for the old days of world peace. I don't see it as an improvement at all, it's going back to more centralization at a local level. It's just replacing one addiction for another.

    This cycle will continue until people learn to live independently without highly controlled central powers. It goes against our nature as hunter gatherers tribal societies anyways I mean just look at India

    each one of those places is essentially it's own autonomous economic region and they can't tell each other what to do, but they are in an economic union which we call a "country". I think looking at the entire planet like this makes more sense like the RUST BELT DETROIT region and various economic cooridoors that don't follow political lines on a map but instead are not static and constantly changing shifting lines on a battlefield determining the various winners and losers in economy, population , etc

    Originally posted by Ghost This greater Sao Paulo, one of the largest urban populous regions in the entire world



    It kinda blows my mind. I live in a megalopolis mega region myself but nowhere near this vast



    I could walk to nature and eventually away from civilization but in a place like that you could walk for days passing city after city like an endless urban sprawl
Jump to Top