User Controls
"Deadliest Varient Covid Yet" to hit UK by October
-
2023-09-14 at 2:50 AM UTC
-
2023-09-14 at 2:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ So I guess I'm just asking, how does the rushed vaccine benefit the corporate overlords any more than putting said vaccine secretly into Cheerios?
it's currently only viable if it it goes straight to tissue or the bloodstream, they don't currently have a way to encapsulate the M'RNA in such a way that it isn't destroyed by first-pass metabolism
I do remember seeing a bunch of articles that suggest they're working on it though -
2023-09-14 at 3:03 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I don't…the results speak for themselves.
The hospitals were full, elective surgeries were canceled…beds were not available….that all went away. Deaths declined dramatically once the vaccine was in widespread distribution? coincidence? I think not.
"testing" was done…has been done…
Testing a new drug for 10yrs on 50,0000 people is less than testing the drug in 4 months on 4 billion people…
Math.
I've already addressed all of this.
1. hospitals were full because of media-driven panic, less than 40% ever showed symptoms of serious respiratory illness (decreased blood-oxygen level).
2. canceling 'elective' surgeries (the definition for elective is a surgery that you don't need to prevent death within 24 hours) was an extreme overreaction that exacerbated problems with hospital resources for the next year or more, likely leading to more deaths.
3. all-cause mortality has been rising, not falling. deaths labeled 'COVID' have declined because of their categorisation, not any real decrease.
4. your injury numbers are entirely unverifiable. -
2023-09-14 at 3:08 AM UTC
they've never had your best interests in mind -
2023-09-14 at 9:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson CDC
"Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare. It has occurred at a rate of approximately 5 cases per one million vaccine doses administered. Anaphylaxis, a severe type of allergic reaction, can occur after any kind of vaccination. "
how does one discern between anal-phylaxis shock and mercury poisoning. -
2023-09-14 at 12:20 PM UTC
-
2023-09-14 at 12:23 PM UTC
-
2023-09-14 at 12:25 PM UTC
-
2023-09-14 at 12:28 PM UTC
-
2023-09-14 at 12:29 PM UTC
-
2023-09-14 at 2:40 PM UTCPfizer received the largest criminal fine for fraud in history, and yet people still gleefully inject their garbage into their bloodstreams, and the bloodstreams of their kids. Just goes to show how truly stupid some people are.
-
2023-09-14 at 2:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Pfizer received the largest criminal fine for fraud in history, and yet people still gleefully inject their garbage into their bloodstreams, and the bloodstreams of their kids. Just goes to show how truly stupid some people are.
Nothing to do with the covid vax
Anyway I got the Moderna one! -
2024-02-29 at 12:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra 3. The IgG4 thing has been well-documented over the last year or so, basically the MR'NA-type vaccines flood a person's system with so many spike proteins that they desensitise the immune response. An IgG4 response is what the immune system deploys when a 'dangerous agent' does minimal damage and is persistent long-term, instructing antibodies to tolerate it rather than actively attack it. IgG4 proteins begin to outweigh the other IgGs (essentially attack orders) after the third or so booster: https://archive.vn/Nq5by
revival of a classic.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adj9945
this study, in the opening paragraph states that the M'RNA 'vaccines' induce a strong immune response against the initial strains of COVID but less against the later strains, but further down indicates that in the actual immune response, IgG4 responses outnumber IgG1 and IgG3 at least 2:1 even in the initial shot (not just the boosters as was expected).To explore in greater detail spike-specific antibody responses following bivalent mRNA boosting, we assessed IgG subclass responses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4) against WA1/2020, BA.1, BA.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 following bivalent mRNA boosting. Less than twofold increases in IgG1 responses were observed to WA1/2020, BA.1, BA.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 at week 3 and returned to preboost levels by month 3 (Fig. 4A). A similar trend was observed with IgG3 responses. Slightly higher 4.9-, 2.7-, 1.9-, 1.7-, and 1.5-fold increases in IgG2 responses were seen to WA1/2020, BA.1, BA.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 at week 3 (Fig. 4A). In contrast, markedly higher 11.2-, 11.0-, 9.1-, 8.5-, and 7.8-fold increases in IgG4 responses were observed to WA1/2020, BA.1, BA.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 at week 3, and these responses were durable at month 3 (Fig. 4A). These results suggested that bivalent mRNA boosting did not substantially increase proinflammatory IgG1 and IgG3 responses but rather skewed responses primarily to isotype-switched IgG4 responses.
-
2024-02-29 at 1:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump I'm lucky, I got the Pfizer shot early on, and have kept my boosters up to date every 6 months since then. I'm going in tomorrow to get my boosters for the winter, looking forward to that. Science not only keeps me healthy, it protects those around me. I'd encourage everyone here to make sure your shots are up to date.
Amateur.
Professionals get their boosters more often than diabeetus victums take their insulin. -
2024-02-29 at 1:09 PM UTC
-
2024-02-29 at 1:09 PM UTCthey're both a viral load
-
2024-02-29 at 1:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Pfizer received the largest criminal fine for fraud in history, and yet people still gleefully inject their garbage into their bloodstreams, and the bloodstreams of their kids. Just goes to show how truly stupid some people are.
Nigeria...1996
Pfizer ceo...veterinarian.
Kike. -
2024-02-29 at 1:19 PM UTC
-
2024-02-29 at 1:21 PM UTC
-
2024-07-30 at 1:34 AM UTC