User Controls
Fox the user has deleted his account because he's a pedophile
-
2024-01-08 at 1:12 AM UTC
-
2024-01-08 at 1:17 AM UTCNot that kids should be here but there are more pedos on tiktok/discord/snap than there will ever be here. She also clearly enjoys that sweet online validation from pandering to pedos and won't change just because we are moralfaggoting.
I say we enjoy this birth of true and honest lolcow. Fent addict? Baby mama? Cam whore? Special victims unit?
My bet is on discord kitty turned recruiter for a fellow true and honest woman. How many years does that land you on the burgerland? -
2024-01-08 at 1:18 AM UTCI would like to make myself available as ambassador of the community, if anyone is feeling unsafe and wants to reach out please pms me. Remember there is always glory with christ kids, stab pedophiles in the eye and cancel culture them at every chance, leave no stone unturned.
We need to empower the youths not to live in fear of stranger danger and groomers and instead educate them on how to spot and slaughter sickfucks or else the cycle of abuse will continue.
I don't care that crisolis is a retarded underaged girl or where she posts, but if anyone tries to touch a darn kid on my watch I will smite them with the almighty pimp hand in the name of God because that's the christian thing to do.
Look, I don't care WHAT you say! IF YOU EVER TOUCH HIM AGAIN I WILL FREAKING KILL YOU!
Originally posted by totse2118 I'M GONNA PULL OUT A GOD DAMN SHOTGUN AND BLOW YOUR DAMN HEAD OFF. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?!
YOU LITTLE WORTHLESS PIECE OF CRAP!
Deep down I think this is the real reason Sophie left is that as a community because of people like wariat and vinny I think we've taken a stand that the person simply has to be gutted on the spot and there is no other way -
2024-01-08 at 1:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by HadrianusAugustus Not that kids should be here but there are more pedos on tiktok/discord/snap than there will ever be here. She also clearly enjoys that sweet online validation from pandering to pedos and won't change just because we are moralfaggoting.
I say we enjoy this birth of true and honest lolcow. Fent addict? Baby mama? Cam whore? Special victims unit?
My bet is on discord kitty turned recruiter for a fellow true and honest woman. How many years does that land you on the burgerland?
So you're saying you want to get off on a child hurting themselves? You're a red flag. -
2024-01-08 at 1:22 AM UTCfax, the user
-
2024-01-08 at 1:22 AM UTCWhat she needs is to be scared straight and that can easily be done by telling her the truth. She may already end up in a psych ward because of the report I made.
-
2024-01-08 at 1:23 AM UTCokay everyojne shut the fuck up this was literally solved on totse over 20 years ago in newspapers, your grandstanding doesn't mean shit, you aren't keffals and this isn't kiwifarms. Try bitching on X instead
Virtually anyone who understands how to use a computer and modem can tap
into the rogue bulletin boards, if they have the phone numbers. The
boards allow callers to create their own logons and passwords, opening
the door for kids to get into the system. Based on their content, the
bulletin boards appear to be particularly popular among teen-agers.
[Also not true. If the reporter had done even the most basic research,
such as actually reading the messages in the message base, he would have
quickly realized that we have people from virtually ALL age groups
frequenting NIRVANAnet™. - TE]
"This shows why people need to be much more aware of what kids are doing
with their computers," said Hans Von Braun, a computer security expert
who works for San Francisco-based Comsec.
One bulletin board, Burn This Flag, requires callers to fill out an
application before gaining access to an adults-only section that
contains files describing "bizarre sexual behavior." But in a written
message, Burn This Flag's system operator, known as "Zardoz,"
acknowledges there is no foolproof way to ensure all users of the adult
section are at least 18.
The Times isn't publishing the phone numbers of the rebel bulletin
boards as a children's safeguard. [Besides, people might actually call
the systems in question and find out that the reporter only told part of
the truth, and as everyone knows, the most effective way to lie is to
only tell part of the truth. - TE]
The bulletin boards remain open by straddling a fine line between the
legal definitions of free speech and criminal behavior. [There is no
"fine line". We are not engaged in criminal activities, period. We are
engaged in speech, period. Speech is protected, period. When the day
comes where people can be imprisoned merely for what they say or what
they think, it's time to move to another country. - TE]
Under First Amendment rights guaranteeing free speech, the law allows
the bulletin boards to serve as criminal primers, as long a the advice
is limited to generic instructions. Essentially, it's legal for
individuals to discuss how to commit a crime as long as they don't
solicit or encourage the commission of a crime.
"We're aware of these types of bulletin boards," said Rick Smith, an FBI
spokesman in San Francisco. "But to shut them down, you have to make a
link between the discussion of a crime and the commission of a crime."
Law enforcement officials and security experts said they snoop through
rogue bulletin boards to stay abreast of advice available to prospective
criminals. These periodic checks might spot possible weaknesses in
security systems and help authorities take precautions.
Pacific Bell can't refuse phone access to the underground bulletin
boards, even though the forums often contain advice on how to commit
phone fraud.
"Unless we catch people actually doing the criminal act, there is no
crime to prosecute," said Pacific Bell spokesman Craig Watts. "You can't
prosecute someone for bad thoughts." [… but they're working on it. - TE]
To Whom It May Concern:
As the System Operator of & the Temple of the Screaming Electron and
the network co-ordinator for NIRVANAnet(tm) I wanted to thank your
paper for the extra publicity that Michael Liedtke's sensationalistic
article "MODEM OPERANDI: Tips On Crime Go On-line" has provided for our
BBS network.
I helped to start NIRVANAnet(tm) four years ago because I wanted to
create a computer network where ideas, any ideas, could be freely
exchanged between people. I wanted to create a network that was open,
free, and easily accessable.
When you exchange messages with people on NIRVANAnet(tm), you do not
know the age, gender, race, religious affiliation, political party,
hair length, mode of dress, or sexual orientation of the person you are
talking to. Because of this, people cannot be pigeon-holed into neat
little categories and you end up learning an amazing amount about the
thoughts, feelings, and beliefs of a much wider array of people than
you would encounter in everyday life. On our network teenagers talk to
grandparents, bikers talk with born-again Christians, and Socialists
talk to Republicans. These people would never speak to one another if
they met on the street, but because they can use computers, they freely
exchange thoughts, ideas, dreams and hopes.
Mr. Liedtke stated that we are "Using the First Amendment as a legal
shield" and that "The bulletin boards remain open by straddling a fine
line between the legal definitions of free speech and criminal
behavior."
I'm surprised that a newspaper reporter, of all people, has such a
callous disregard for the First Ammendment. There is no "fine line". We
are not engaged in criminal activities, period. We are engaged in
speech, period. Speech is protected, period. When the day comes where
people can be imprisoned merely for what they say or what they think,
it's time to move to another country. As Pacific Bell spokesman Craig
Watts stated in the article "You can't prosecute someone for bad
thoughts."
The information in the "criminal" text files that Mr. Liedtke refers to
can be found in any well-stocked library, or ordered from any number of
book publishers in this country. Many of our files were found on the
Internet, a worldwide government/university/industry network funded in
part by the National Science Foundation.
The article also stated that "The Times isn't publishing the phone
numbers of the rebel bulletin boards as a children's safeguard."
Another reason might be that people would actually call the systems in
question and find out that Mr. Liedtke did not tell the whole story,
and as everyone knows, the most effective way to lie is to only tell
part of the truth.
Sincerely,
Jeff Hunter
Sysop, & the Temple of the Screaming Electron -
2024-01-08 at 1:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kafka So you're saying you want to get off on a child hurting themselves? You're a red flag.
Maybe what you need is some drug that gives you reading.comprehension but I will explain it just for you. A kid this immature with no parental supervision is bound to find pedos online because that is a perk that comes with the internet nowadays. Whether it is here or somewhere else it is bound to happen. It's up to her to not be retarded, know better, and listen to the warnings given to her. If she wants to fuck up her life before she reaches the legal age that is gonna happen regardless or not we moralfag. I wasn't this retarded and immature at 14 and I can tell you I was pretty fucking stupid.
But anyways, if anyone truly wants to help her in reality stop feeding the attention seeking behaviours and giving her validation. Literally nothing else works. -
2024-01-08 at 1:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by HadrianusAugustus Maybe what you need is some drug that gives you athletic abilities but I will explain just for you. A kid this immature with no parental supervision is bound to find pedos online because that is a perk that comes with the internet nowadays. Whether it is here or somewhere else it is bound to happen. It's up to her to not be retarded, know better, and listen to the warnings given to her. If she wants to fuck up her life before she reaches the legal age that is gonna happen regardless or not we moralfag. I wasn't this retarded and immature at 14 and I can tell you I was pretty fucking stupid.
But anyways, if anyone truly wants to help her in reality stop feeding the attention seeking behaviours and giving her validation. Literally nothing else works.
Translation: I'm trying to convince everyone to be okay with her staying because I really want her to stay so I can nudge her toward ruining her life and get off on it. -
2024-01-08 at 1:32 AM UTCI have no idea what prompted lanny to make that a wordfi'lter in the first place
-
2024-01-08 at 1:32 AM UTC
-
2024-01-08 at 1:32 AM UTCYou shouldn't even be okay with talking to a 14 year old online.
-
2024-01-08 at 1:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kafka Translation: I'm trying to convince everyone to be okay with her staying because I really want her to stay so I can nudge her toward ruining her life and get off on it.
Translation: Bad faith misrepresentation because I'm a narc with a saviour complex and want to virtue signal -
2024-01-08 at 1:36 AM UTCYou think someone not turning a blind eye to child abuse is virtue signalling? You've really shown your colours.
-
2024-01-08 at 1:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I have no idea what prompted lanny to make that a wordfi'lter in the first place
I was surprised too lmao but it's actually funny
Originally posted by Kafka You shouldn't even be okay with talking to a 14 year old online.
I'm not, but you will derrail the conversation and misrepresent whatever I say. No one likes that the minimum age on most apps is 13, but it is a fact that kids will encounter degen content so parental responsability and common sense should be emphasized. I actually think you did well in reporting this, but your answers tell me it's time for you to take the meds.
Originally posted by Kafka You think someone not turning a blind eye to child abuse is virtue signalling? You've really shown your colours.
No, my point is that she is complicit in her own abuse. In a decade she will cry rape but it will be too late. -
2024-01-08 at 1:43 AM UTCwhats the new word fitter, GUT EM LIKE A FISH???
-
2024-01-08 at 1:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by HadrianusAugustus I was surprised too lmao but it's actually funny
I'm not, but you will derrail the conversation and misrepresent whatever I say. No one likes that the minimum age on most apps is 13, but it is a fact that kids will encounter degen content so parental responsability and common sense should be emphasized. I actually think you did well in reporting this, but your answers tell me it's time for you to take the meds.
Your answers have dug you into a deeper hole. -
2024-01-08 at 1:47 AM UTC
-
2024-01-08 at 1:48 AM UTC
-
2024-01-08 at 1:50 AM UTCWho have we got on the list now:
Fox, done a runner.
Kof, in possession of cp, introduced a child to a place he knew is full of misogynists and pedofiles, doesn't care about child abuse.
Hadrianus, trying to gaslight everyone into thinking it's okay for her to be here, is really a misogynist and wants to hurt the girl and get off on it.