User Controls
The nogging continues
-
2023-11-25 at 4:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump A lot of white people do. They genuinely believe people will change and start acting differently from all their ancestors when put in a different environment. They believe the mind to be an instrument of perfect rationality and perfect malleability, despite all the evidence to the contrary. A lot of them don't believe in instincts or in an creatures basic inherent nature, and believe things like that a cat will live like a cow if raised by cattle, and vice-versa.
It's fundamentally an irrational, religious belief. It's very popular with anglo protestant sorts.
it finally worked when the whiteys imported darkies from another geographic region with a complete, totally different superstructure.
the dalited darkies.
these are the anodized aryans. -
2023-11-25 at 4:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra that's like the whole Empire of Dust documentary
I remember a scene where he's talking about railways the Belgians built but the locals never bothered to maintain after they left
this is why the "china debt trap" the the "west" prefer to call it is actually the best policy for them.
china invested money in constructing these infrastructures for them, but if these infrastructures in anyway get paid off and become africans then they are going to degrade over time and will be rendered unuseable in less than a decade.
the so called "debt traps" is actually an altruistic, phillantrophy with chinese characteristisch.
africans can only run things into the ground. -
2023-11-25 at 4:27 AM UTC
-
2023-11-25 at 5:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny this is why the "china debt trap" the the "west" prefer to call it is actually the best policy for them.
china invested money in constructing these infrastructures for them, but if these infrastructures in anyway get paid off and become africans then they are going to degrade over time and will be rendered unuseable in less than a decade.
the so called "debt traps" is actually an altruistic, phillantrophy with chinese characteristisch.
africans can only run things into the ground.
no, the 'debt trap' is also known as 'usury'...which is the term it has been defined as for about 5,000 years and been banned for longer than it has been allowed. do some historical research. -
2023-11-25 at 7:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock no, the 'debt trap' is also known as 'usury'…which is the term it has been defined as for about 5,000 years and been banned for longer than it has been allowed. do some historical research.
perspective,
"ursury" is just capital rent viewed from extreme angle.
you rent a property and its not unjust to pay rent for it.
so when you rent capitals (money) its not unreasonable to expect to pay rent for it too.
just like how your dads rent you out to ghetto niggers for ciggarette and booze monies.
thats not ursury. -
2023-11-25 at 10:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny this is why the "china debt trap" the the "west" prefer to call it is actually the best policy for them.
china invested money in constructing these infrastructures for them, but if these infrastructures in anyway get paid off and become africans then they are going to degrade over time and will be rendered unuseable in less than a decade.
the so called "debt traps" is actually an altruistic, phillantrophy with chinese characteristisch.
africans can only run things into the ground.
This is hilarious.
Chineses are walking into the same trap that Europeans did, worrying about what is best for Africans. -
2023-11-25 at 1:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock no, the 'debt trap' is also known as 'usury'…which is the term it has been defined as for about 5,000 years and been banned for longer than it has been allowed. do some historical research.
youre essentially just saying you dont believe scams exist because theyre illegal -
2023-11-25 at 2:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny perspective,
"ursury" is just capital rent viewed from extreme angle.
you rent a property and its not unjust to pay rent for it.
so when you rent capitals (money) its not unreasonable to expect to pay rent for it too.
just like how your dads rent you out to ghetto niggers for ciggarette and booze monies.
thats not ursury.
theres not enough bandwidth to type the historical (as in a few thousand years ago up to about the middle ages (about when venice was a 'country' in its prime)) explanations and reasoning why 'usury' is bad...but it is.
the terms you are using are ones invented by juden market manipulators.
tldr: currency is a means of facilitating the flow of functionality. usury is a means to stem that natural flow.
your analogies are wholly inaccurate in the grand scheme of things. currency was 'invented' as a means to simplify the natural functionality of a civilization after it became too advanced (complicated) to base 'value' on food items. monetary units...currency...is not capital any more than oil, food products, or minerals are. all have been 'capitalized' by those seeking to gain a profit from them at the expense of those needing those products. criminal capitalists manipulate the value of those items for their financial gain. they should be allowed to function as a simplified product to be used for their intended purpose and nature.
just like when random strangers use your assorted orifices to stuff their dicks into, wiggle them around for a few minutes, then wipe them off on your shirt. -
2023-11-25 at 2:27 PM UTC
-
2023-11-25 at 2:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump This is hilarious.
Chineses are walking into the same trap that Europeans did, worrying about what is best for Africans.
in exchange for a lot of real, tangible natural resources and a market for industrial outputs.
unlike europeans that just took everything during their era of colonialism, chinamen intends to develope these undeveloped people into developing people so that they can afford to buy products and finished consumer goods, things that their bretherens living in the developed world could just "harvest" by running into stores and grab as much as possible. -
2023-11-25 at 2:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny in exchange for a lot of real, tangible natural resources and a market for industrial outputs.
unlike europeans that just took everything during their era of colonialism, chinamen intends to develope these undeveloped people into developing people so that they can afford to buy products and finished consumer goods, things that their bretherens living in the developed world could just "harvest" by running into stores and grab as much as possible.
it's probably not going to work though -
2023-11-25 at 2:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny in exchange for a lot of real, tangible natural resources and a market for industrial outputs.
unlike europeans that just took everything during their era of colonialism, chinamen intends to develope these undeveloped people into developing people so that they can afford to buy products and finished consumer goods, things that their bretherens living in the developed world could just "harvest" by running into stores and grab as much as possible.
that is literally the opposite of what theyre doing. theyre using usury in the manner it was intended to be used as: as an ultimate result of the victim being unable to repay the debt which was originally a trivial amount and allowing the usurer to foreclose on the asset, taking possession of it -
2023-11-25 at 2:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock theres not enough bandwidth to type the historical (as in a few thousand years ago up to about the middle ages (about when venice was a 'country' in its prime)) explanations and reasoning why 'usury' is bad…but it is.
the terms you are using are ones invented by juden market manipulators.
tldr: currency is a means of facilitating the flow of functionality. usury is a means to stem that natural flow.
your analogies are wholly inaccurate in the grand scheme of things. currency was 'invented' as a means to simplify the natural functionality of a civilization after it became too advanced (complicated) to base 'value' on food items. monetary units…currency…is not capital any more than oil, food products, or minerals are. all have been 'capitalized' by those seeking to gain a profit from them at the expense of those needing those products. criminal capitalists manipulate the value of those items for their financial gain. they should be allowed to function as a simplified product to be used for their intended purpose and nature.
just like when random strangers use your assorted orifices to stuff their dicks into, wiggle them around for a few minutes, then wipe them off on your shirt.
it doesnt matter if your a pre-historic farmer, a medieval niggersmith or a modern cubicle dweller, there will come a time you will HAVE to consume more than you can make; ie, during bad times, due to force majures, acts of gods, or just simple bussiness expansion to stay ahead of the competition,
and this will require more currencies than you currently possesses,
example: your a prehistoric farmer, a barely competent one. you husbands just enough for your family to survive and hunts and gathers when there are shortfalls.
one year bad weather, draught or flood destroyed all your crops. now your choice are either :
a- starve
b- canibalize your wife and children in the hopes that you may survive
c- get a loan by borrowing foods/grains from a more competent farmer that have surplus.
these surplus grains are capital.
the fat that your body produces when you ate too much and work too little is also capital. -
2023-11-25 at 2:48 PM UTC
-
2023-11-25 at 2:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock that is literally the opposite of what theyre doing. theyre using usury in the manner it was intended to be used as: as an ultimate result of the victim being unable to repay the debt which was originally a trivial amount and allowing the usurer to foreclose on the asset, taking possession of it
like i said, if africans managed to pay off their debt to china and begin to own these infrastructures, they are going to break down soon enough simply due tk niggers inabilities to maintain the gears of civilization.
these infrastructure are better off owned and operated by chinamen. only when chinamen continue tk own and operate these facilities will the niggers be able to live in civilized, developed ecosystem. -
2023-11-25 at 2:56 PM UTC
-
2023-11-25 at 3:14 PM UTCit is what it is
-
2023-11-25 at 3:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny it doesnt matter if your a pre-historic farmer, a medieval niggersmith or a modern cubicle dweller, there will come a time you will HAVE to consume more than you can make; ie, during bad times, due to force majures, acts of gods, or just simple bussiness expansion to stay ahead of the competition,
and this will require more currencies than you currently possesses,
example: your a prehistoric farmer, a barely competent one. you husbands just enough for your family to survive and hunts and gathers when there are shortfalls.
one year bad weather, draught or flood destroyed all your crops. now your choice are either :
a- starve
b- canibalize your wife and children in the hopes that you may survive
c- get a loan by borrowing foods/grains from a more competent farmer that have surplus.
these surplus grains are capital.
the fat that your body produces when you ate too much and work too little is also capital.
youre either member of the kike subspecies or mongoloid subspecies. theyre the only ones mentally defective enough to justify such drivel. your outlook is based on the usury and debt-based economy that is entirely too prevalent in todays society. you using the term 'capital' to define a food item...a necessity to survival and existence...is an example of your degenerate juden thought process. this is part of why modern society is so fucked.
using your example, yes, ancient farmers...as in sumerian/mesopamian times, not 'pre-historic' as in times where there are no records (written or oral)...would acquire resources outside of their means. the records of exactly your example are found on many...countless...clay tablets written in cuneiform. firstly, they didnt have money. they bartered or used actual tangibles as the means of exchange...such as 'bundles' of wheat...'bunches' of fish...etc. they didnt have weights. 'shekels' were where they sorta kinda started to weigh things.
uber simplified example: if a farmer needed more resources than he had available he'd go to family members first, then 'neighbors', or then wealthy members of the city or merchants. then theyd make an arrangement about what the 'lender' would provide then once the crop was harvested, such as how much of that crop would be given to the lender as repayment for his (or rarely her) INVESTMENT. this was all 'written' down on a clay tablet as a binding contract. regarding the 'barely competent' farmer...that farmer would not be given any investments due to his reputation. -
2023-11-25 at 3:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny like i said, if africans managed to pay off their debt to china and begin to own these infrastructures, they are going to break down soon enough simply due tk niggers inabilities to maintain the gears of civilization.
these infrastructure are better off owned and operated by chinamen. only when chinamen continue tk own and operate these facilities will the niggers be able to live in civilized, developed ecosystem.
das rathiss. you rathist -
2023-11-25 at 3:16 PM UTC
