User Controls
The Autism Quotient Test - Everyone here should seriously take it.
-
2017-06-02 at 6:26 PM UTCYou're such a faggot, sploodypopoody.
Do the test, score 29 and see for yourself. Asperger's. -
2017-06-03 at 12:51 AM UTCYour score was 21 out of a possible 50.
Scores in the 0 - 25 range indicate little or no Autistic traits.
I’m kinda surprised I scored that low honestly. -
2017-06-03 at 1:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by hydromorphone == Results from bdsmtest.org ==
100% Submissive
100% Brat
100% Rope bunny
97% Girl/Boy
96% Vanilla
61% Primal (Prey)
47% Ageplayer
42% Daddy/Mommy
31% Pet
27% Switch
18% Experimentalist
16% Rigger
15% Non-monogamist
1% Slave
1% Dominant
1% Primal (Hunter)
1% Exhibitionist
1% Voyeur
0% Degradee
0% Masochist
0% Degrader
0% Owner
0% Master/Mistress
0% Sadist
I took it. There is the results I got. I am pretty vanilla when I comes to sex, to be honest. I am very submissive, and I like being tied up or held down and I like to have dominant partners, but not ones who are abusive and hurtful, just… In control.
They’ve changed the options on that test since I took it, I guess it’s time to update my profiles. -
2017-06-03 at 4:30 PM UTC
-
2017-06-03 at 6:23 PM UTCRisiR's new user tittle is perfect.
-
2017-06-04 at 1:52 PM UTC32 Autism
-
2017-06-04 at 2:43 PM UTC
-
2017-06-04 at 7:13 PM UTCI wonder what Zok would have scored. He may have had a bad case of the burgers.
-
2017-06-05 at 3:25 PM UTC19.
Can't someone come up with a test that doesn't make every fucking inquiry so obvious as to whether or your not your answer is going to be +1/2 autism?
It's way too easy to tell how your answer will affect your score. Plus, like many of these, they reword the same thing twice and noticing it BUGS me.
'I feel comfortable in social situations.'
'I like social situations.'
'Im good at small talk.'
'I don't like to make small talk.'
This whole test is basically, do you like to go outside or not. I want a FUN test, one that has situations and multiple choices, something like:
You are the last in a line of 4 inside your bank, when the person in front of you unknowingly drops what is clearly a large sum of money tucked into an envelope. You can tell nobody in line noticed, nor did the bank teller. A lady sitting nearby is out of your field of vision so you haven't yet noticed if she noticed as well (she hasn't). Of these choices pick the most likely response for yourself:
A- Immediately and without hesitation grab the person's attention and tell they dropped something.
B- Hesitate for a moment and glance behind you to see if the lady noticed. You see she didn't and momentarily consider taking the money, but instead you grab the person's attention and tell them what happened.
C- Same as B, except after seeing the lady didn't notice, you spend a few seconds quickly weighing your options and decide to just go for it, grabbing the money and just exiting the building.
D- Don't check to see if the lady saw, instantly with no hesitation grabbing the envelope and leaving.
E- Rip your shirt off and pound on your chest as you yell to all that you are the great Harambe, who's come back to do a great deed by returning this here person's money.
You're hoping for a monetary thank you from the person.
Tests like that. I want to those tests. -
2017-06-05 at 3:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ 19.
Can't someone come up with a test that doesn't make every fucking inquiry so obvious as to whether or your not your answer is going to be +1/2 autism?
It's way too easy to tell how your answer will affect your score. Plus, like many of these, they reword the same thing twice and noticing it BUGS me.
'I feel comfortable in social situations.'
'I like social situations.'
'Im good at small talk.'
'I don't like to make small talk.'
This whole test is basically, do you like to go outside or not. I want a FUN test, one that has situations and multiple choices, something like:
You are the last in a line of 4 inside your bank, when the person in front of you unknowingly drops what is clearly a large sum of money tucked into an envelope. You can tell nobody in line noticed, nor did the bank teller. A lady sitting nearby is out of your field of vision so you haven't yet noticed if she noticed as well (she hasn't). Of these choices pick the most likely response for yourself:
A- Immediately and without hesitation grab the person's attention and tell they dropped something.
B- Hesitate for a moment and glance behind you to see if the lady noticed. You see she didn't and momentarily consider taking the money, but instead you grab the person's attention and tell them what happened.
C- Same as B, except after seeing the lady didn't notice, you spend a few seconds quickly weighing your options and decide to just go for it, grabbing the money and just exiting the building.
D- Don't check to see if the lady saw, instantly with no hesitation grabbing the envelope and leaving.
E- Rip your shirt off and pound on your chest as you yell to all that you are the great Harambe, who's come back to do a great deed by returning this here person's money.
You're hoping for a monetary thank you from the person.
Tests like that. I want to those tests.
fun tests by sploo :D
https://iqexams.net/test/index.php?test=NuMa40 -
2017-06-05 at 4:05 PM UTC
-
2017-06-05 at 4:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Can't someone come up with a test that doesn't make every fucking inquiry so obvious as to whether or your not your answer is going to be +1/2 autism?
It's way too easy to tell how your answer will affect your score. Plus, like many of these, they reword the same thing twice and noticing it BUGS me.
Unfortunately, probably not. If you're at least somewhat familiar with the autism spectrum and its symptoms and have a high enough level of intelligence it isn't particularly difficult to identify the patterns. The questions that have the highest correlation with an autism spectrum diagnosis are likely going to seem to be among the most obvious.
As to the rewording, it's done to find inconsistency among the responses, in case people answer inaccurately or misinterpret the question. Most psychological tests use this technique for a good reason, it's a necessary annoyance.
You have to keep in mind that a diagnosis by a psychiatrist, preferably an ASD specialist, would take over an hour. -
2017-06-05 at 4:52 PM UTCOh, and the above is a very good reason why Lanny's results in particular may have been considerably inaccurate. Even if he wasn't consciously aware of what he was doing he certainly has the mental acuity to accomplish it subconsciously.
-
2017-06-05 at 4:58 PM UTC
-
2017-06-05 at 5 PM UTC
-
2017-06-05 at 5:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Unfortunately, probably not. If you're at least somewhat familiar with the autism spectrum and its symptoms and have a high enough level of intelligence it isn't particularly difficult to identify the patterns. The questions that have the highest correlation with an autism spectrum diagnosis are likely going to seem to be among the most obvious.
As to the rewording, it's done to find inconsistency among the responses, in case people answer inaccurately or misinterpret the question. Most psychological tests use this technique for a good reason, it's a necessary annoyance.
You have to keep in mind that a diagnosis by a psychiatrist, preferably an ASD specialist, would take over an hour.
do you think my misdiagnosis(?) of aspergers at 14 and pdd-nos at 17 is because i have so much shit wrong with me + high IQ its easy enough to label it a developmental disorder? i mean i'd play with a rubixs cube in the psych ward and make games in my notebook but that's because i was bored as fuck, not because it's like a special interest. and someone with an IQ of 140ish is obviously not going to relate to their fellow juvenile delinquents very well.
that and the fact that both times i ended up in the psych ward i was doing shitloads of drugs and going crazy. as a teen i would avoid almost any eye contact but that was due to extreme social anxiety. i'm more conscious about making eye contact now in social situations. as a child i had a bunch of friends but that stopped around 13 or 14.
i'd mostly avoid eye contact with professionals because i was lying to their face and trying to present myself in a positive, innocent light to be released, and i figured if they saw my eyes they could tell i was lying. that and severe self-doubt/social anxiety.
but then other psychiatrists that i've seen for months or years i've asked specifically (2 or 3 of them) if i have autism and they said they don't see that in my behavior, and one said i'm too socially adept. do you think i'm on the spectrum, or that simply having some autistic traits along with a fuckload of other mental abnormalities is enough to make a psychiatrist erroneously conclude PDD?
i've also be misdiagnosed with a fuckload of other things like Bipolar I disorder, Psychotic Disorder- Not Otherwise Specified, Behavioral Disorder- Not Otherwise Specified, Mood Disorder- Not Otherwise Specified. All by different doctors.
i personally think i don't have any mental disorders except mixed-anxiety depression and OCD. Maybe some mild sociopathy. when i take shitty deliriant dissociative hallucinogen spice rcs mixed with benzos and speed of course every time i see a doctor im going to have a different clinical presentation.
my main mental disorder is polysubstance dependence, when that's taken out of the equation i've fairly normal despite some eccentricities.
*expert psychiatrist mal-mal now chimes in* -
2017-06-05 at 5:12 PM UTCits kind of funny that i got diagnosed PDD-NOS at the same hospital i literally manipulated myself out of 6 months of incarceration into freedom. i can trick an entire institution man
-
2017-06-05 at 5:16 PM UTCThe trick is not to get institutionanilzed in the first place you mongleroy.
-
2017-06-05 at 5:17 PM UTC
-
2017-06-05 at 5:29 PM UTCAll of that is consistent with being on the autism spectrum. Extreme social anxiety is a common part of Asperger's, and it can be among the worst. I also had friends up until about 13. It's actually common for there to be significant regression, a worsening of (some) symptoms, around that age due to the neurological development that begins to occur around puberty.
I'd been able to scam and fool multiple psychologists and psychiatrists and I'm autistic as fuck. This is a misunderstanding of what autism is, not everyone has low emotional recognition and social awareness, problems with theory of mind. People with very high IQs in particular can learn to understand the world on a cognitive level, as opposed to emotionally and intuitively like most people, and hyper-compensate through sheer intellectual prowess, the hyper-systemizing cognitive style that's generally standard among aspies. As opposed to normal social interaction in these situations, with a professional, there's a clear purpose and you chart out a strategy, anticipating their responses, even how they perceive you, what they may misunderstand, what you should avoid saying etc. Cognitive machiavellianism.
You do have multiple abnormalities, but many of them fall under the ASD cluster, and there a ton of symptoms and comorbidities. It's pretty ridiculous just how much being on the spectrum affects you. As to the comorbidities, these could certainly cloud their judgement, but it's also possible that it's causing people to primarily miss a diagnosis of high functioning autism rather than the inverse. As I mentioned, HFA/Asperger's has a very high rate of comorbidities and a greatly increased risk of certain disorders. The bipolar could be due to the "meltdowns" that are common for even HFAs to have, and they're likely also affected by your drug use, psychology, habituation, and environment.
I'm not sure you have an accurate perception of yourself and would be fairly normal even without drugs. Polydrug abuse to the extent, level of severity, that you've taken it at a young age generally doesn't come out of nowhere. It can be an attempt to self-medicate, stem from profound problems.