User Controls
5000 rockets hit Israel
-
2023-10-09 at 1:29 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian My argument was…people dying as a result or war isn't the same as directly targeting civilians.
…which part of that are you having trouble processing??
The part where what we did wasn’t terrorism, but the other guys are. Just admit Israel and the United States are terrorist organizations just like the other guys and I’ll be fine with it -
2023-10-09 at 1:30 PM UTCTo try and moralize one side or the other is fucktarded
-
2023-10-09 at 1:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox The part where what we did wasn’t terrorism
Well 10 people dying as a result of starvation or a house fire isn't the same as kicking their door in and beheading them.
One is an unfortunate result of war, one is directly targeting them as part of a terrorism agenda.
Stay in school kid. -
2023-10-09 at 1:34 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:35 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Well 10 people dying as a result of starvation or a house fire isn't the same as kicking their door in and beheading them.
One is an unfortunate result of war, one is directly targeting them as part of a terrorism agenda.
Stay in school kid.
Those things aren’t the same in that they’re not literally synonymous but I’m not really sure where you’re trying to go with the distinction. Like if Hamas comes out and says they were targeting Israeli military complexes exclusively but just happened to have really shitty low accuracy munitions (which is probably true) would that make them not be terrorists anymore? -
2023-10-09 at 1:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Those things aren’t the same in that they’re not literally synonymous but I’m not really sure where you’re trying to go with the distinction. Like if Hamas comes out and says they were targeting Israeli military complexes exclusively but just happened to have really shitty low accuracy munitions (which is probably true) would that make them not be terrorists anymore?
There’s no sense to be made here. He’s made a political judgement based on who he thinks are the “bad guys” here, and anything the “good guys” do is fine even if it results in far more deaths and a larger net negative. There is no logic to be foundThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-10-09 at 1:44 PM UTCLots of so called American citizens in Israel. Carrier group moving into the east Med, I suspect some may have a bad day when we rescue Americans in trouble.
-
2023-10-09 at 1:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Those things aren’t the same in that they’re not literally synonymous but I’m not really sure where you’re trying to go with the distinction. Like if Hamas comes out and says they were targeting Israeli military complexes exclusively but just happened to have really shitty low accuracy munitions (which is probably true) would that make them not be terrorists anymore?
Targeting military installations or personnel during an established conflict wouldn't qualify as terrorism in my opinion. Going house to house raping and beheading people including children (as allegedly has happened) would be.
I mean it seems a pretty obvious distinction...civilians die in war...fact...does that mean everyone engaging in war is a terrorist? No.
If a Government or organization has a policy to attack civilians does that make them terrorists/war criminals? yes.
Is the aggressor more accountable than the defender? yes. -
2023-10-09 at 1:52 PM UTC
Originally posted by jerryb Lots of so called American citizens in Israel. Carrier group moving into the east Med, I suspect some may have a bad day when we rescue Americans in trouble.
Originally posted by aldra US is sending a CSG
historically it's at this point israel attacks the US and blames someone else to try to get them to fight the battle for them
you're lucky you're not eligible for the draft -
2023-10-09 at 1:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox There’s no sense to be made here. He’s made a political judgement based on who he thinks are the “bad guys” here, and anything the “good guys” do is fine even if it results in far more deaths and a larger net negative. There is no logic to be found
it's not even that, I don't think he even believes most of what he posts, he just loves to nitpick -
2023-10-09 at 1:54 PM UTCI think most of you are just anti Israel...and so your opinions are quite biased and skewed.
-
2023-10-09 at 1:57 PM UTCA lot of folks take the side against Israel. These moslem fucks have been pulling this shit before Israel or the US where even countries, every since that pedo bastard came out of Arabia they been terrorizing people.
-
2023-10-09 at 1:57 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 2:01 PM UTCYou don't have to be pro Israel. Israel wasn't around when they where invading Greece and the Balkans. They believe in converting by the sword.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2023-10-09 at 2:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by totse2118 So you aren't allowed to disagree with the existence of a jedi state without also being biased about any opinions related to it?
That sounds kinda biased.
Well first off...what's the justification/thinking behind being against a jedi state?
If Israeli soldiers had gone into the Gaza Strip going house to house killing women and children as part of their plan then I'd be equally down on them and calling them terrorists.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-10-09 at 2:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Targeting military installations or personnel during an established conflict wouldn't qualify as terrorism in my opinion. Going house to house raping and beheading people including children (as allegedly has happened) would be.
I mean it seems a pretty obvious distinction…civilians die in war…fact…does that mean everyone engaging in war is a terrorist? No.
If a Government or organization has a policy to attack civilians does that make them terrorists/war criminals? yes.
Is the aggressor more accountable than the defender? yes.
I agree an aggressor is more accountable. Won’t even go into who that is in this case because I bet we wouldn’t agree.
And if that’s what you in your heart believe constitutes terrorism then cool. I just don’t think the distinction is all that relevant. I doubt anyone who gets killed in war is particularly concerned about whether or not they were specifically targeted or collateral damage. I wouldn’t. So I don’t really give any brownie points for not targeting civilians if they’re still killing civilians. -
2023-10-09 at 2:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Well first off…what's the justification/thinking behind being against a jedi state?
I'm against the existence of states in general, but I don't think anyone needs to be justified in murdering anyone they consider an occupying force or just simply don't like them or want their natural resources
that's why states are bad and people are willing to commit mass violence because they are being economically attacked by elites. The "freedom fighters" in Syria were also "terrorists" BUT THE REGIME WAS EVIL SO IT WAS OKAY -
2023-10-09 at 2:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Well first off…what's the justification/thinking behind being against a jedi state?
what is the justification for a j'ewish state? the nazis kicked us out so it's ok for us to go do it to someone else?
Originally posted by Kawkasian If Israeli soldiers had gone into the Gaza Strip going house to house killing women and children as part of their plan then I'd be equally down on them and calling them terrorists.
they do, using the justification that they're 'supporting terrorists'. they're doing it now, bombing mosques and apartment blocks and saying 'Hamas was in there, trust us bro'.
they typically just do it over decades, not in one night.
