User Controls
5000 rockets hit Israel
-
2023-10-09 at 1:11 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:13 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Oh it's hundreds of thousands now huh
But yeah that's how retaliation works.
…you point a knife at me, you'll get shot.
I said it was an estimate range, the thing you quoted was one of many conflicting sources. I could easily pull one right now that said it was over a million and you would just facepalm whatever it says and not believe it anyway.
The point is we’re arguing over whether it was 300k or a million and meanwhile you’re trying to somehow justify that, but calling anyone else who killed a few dozen people a terrorist. The fact you don’t recognize the absurdity of your position tells me everything I need to know, and that arguing any further with you is literally pointless -
2023-10-09 at 1:14 PM UTC"Yes, going 2 mph over the speed limit is exactly the same as going 100mph over the speed limit"
-
2023-10-09 at 1:15 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:15 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:16 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2023-10-09 at 1:16 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:16 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/sep/16/iraq.iraqtimeline
"More than one million deaths were already being suggested by anti-war campaigners,"
-
2023-10-09 at 1:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian No, you said "The campaign in Iraq alone probably killed at least a million civilians. "
It was nowhere NEAR 1 million
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War#Casualties
Lancet survey counted 600,000 civilians in the first three years alone, without considering the US' tricks like counting any male under 35 as an 'enemy combatant' regardless of whether they were actually armed or in combat -
2023-10-09 at 1:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian "More than one million deaths were already being suggested by anti-war campaigners,"
Originally posted by Fox I said it was an estimate range, the thing you quoted was one of many conflicting sources. I could easily pull one right now that said it was over a million and you would just facepalm whatever it says and not believe it anyway.
The point is we’re arguing over whether it was 300k or a million and meanwhile you’re trying to somehow justify that, but calling anyone else who killed a few dozen people a terrorist. The fact you don’t recognize the absurdity of your position tells me everything I need to know, and that arguing any further with you is literally pointless -
2023-10-09 at 1:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War#Casualties
Lancet survey counted 600,000 civilians in the first three years alone, without considering the US' tricks like counting any male under 35 as an 'enemy combatant' regardless of whether they were actually armed or in combat
A price worth paying as (((Madeline))) said.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-10-09 at 1:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War#Casualties
Lancet survey counted 600,000 civilians in the first three years alone, without considering the US' tricks like counting any male under 35 as an 'enemy combatant' regardless of whether they were actually armed or in combat
Regardless of what the direct combat deaths were, the total excess deaths caused by, again, a completely FAKE WAR with no justification whatsoever, were definitely over one million. So who fucking cares if they died from bullets or starvation, they were caused by the terrorist organization known as the United States. -
2023-10-09 at 1:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War#Casualties
Lancet survey counted 600,000 civilians in the first three years alone, without considering the US' tricks like counting any male under 35 as an 'enemy combatant' regardless of whether they were actually armed or in combat
So not a million.
Civilians dying as a result of war isn't the same as directly targeting civilians
-
2023-10-09 at 1:22 PM UTC
-
2023-10-09 at 1:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox calling anyone else who killed a few dozen people a terrorist. The fact you don’t recognize the absurdity of your position tells me everything I need to know, and that arguing any further with you is literally pointless
Killing people who use violence to further their political goals is killing terrorists.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-10-09 at 1:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Well the discussion was regarding DIRECTLY targeting civilians..at least the one I was having was…
So your whole argument is it’s ok to kill at LEAST 300,000 people (but definitely over one million total war related deaths), as long as you aren’t specifically picking each and every brown face out of a crowd and purposely killing them, but it’s not ok to retaliate against a hostile power that has invaded your land and tortured and killed your people if that retaliation causes a few dozen to at most a couple hundred civilian deaths. Your moral compass here is obviously completely fucked -
2023-10-09 at 1:27 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2023-10-09 at 1:28 PM UTC
