User Controls
"Deadliest Varient Covid Yet" to hit UK by October
-
2023-08-27 at 12:31 PM UTC
-
2023-08-27 at 1:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite Yeah except for the fact that literally none of the high profile individuals got the actual vaccine
At least you were smart enough to come back with something that would actually undermine what I said, even if it's bullshit.
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Don't make me have to fry your motherboard, kid.
You couldn't fry an egg, gramps. -
2023-08-27 at 1:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai What happened to "igg4" and covid being real but the boosters reduce your immune response?
serious answer:
1. COVID is probably a real, distinct virus, even though isolated genetic sequences are questionable. It was (is) rather mild in and of itself, but like similar illnesses it could be lethal in people with compromised immune systems or other comorbidities.
2. Influenza deaths (statistically) disappeared during the CORONA MADNESS MONTHS because virtually all deaths relating to respiratory infections were attributed to COVID - there's no reasonable way to determine the direct cause of death without an autopsy, and US hospitals were specifically very liberal about attributing deaths to COVID because of the way insurance paid out per-patient. These standards were largely adopted by other countries (ie. attributing any death to COVID if the patient had tested positive in the previous weeks), even where the insurance incentive did not exist.
3. The IgG4 thing has been well-documented over the last year or so, basically the MR'NA-type vaccines flood a person's system with so many spike proteins that they desensitise the immune response. An IgG4 response is what the immune system deploys when a 'dangerous agent' does minimal damage and is persistent long-term, instructing antibodies to tolerate it rather than actively attack it. IgG4 proteins begin to outweigh the other IgGs (essentially attack orders) after the third or so booster: https://archive.vn/Nq5by
4. This is likely to result in the virus selecting for lethality, rather than longevity. MAREKS FOR MEN. -
2023-08-27 at 1:36 PM UTCTo be clear I don't think it's a 'depopulation tool', rather a lot of small-hats used their positions to take advantage of the situation to push what they saw as THE FUTURE OF MEDICINE without any of that pesky, expensive safety testing and it's backfiring spectacularly.
That is of course assuming the theory that the vaccines are coded to create second-generation sterility isn't true. If it is we're headed for a Children of Men scenario and I really didn't like that movie -
2023-08-27 at 1:38 PM UTCits not "backfiring" if the population is unable to resist despite, and inspite of documented gravely severe consequences of these "vaccines".
-
2023-08-27 at 2:15 PM UTCThey didn't even test positive for Covid. The test used was never designed to identify ANY virus, much less Covid. The PCR test was only intended to identify foreign particles, which could be from any one of a thousand different sources. Even one of the inventers of the PCR test was astounded that his test was being used to identify Covid and stated it cannot, and was not intended to, identify any virus. Add to that, they increased the cycles on the useless PCR test to a point that the results were worthless, even in just detecting foreign particles.
-
2023-08-27 at 2:18 PM UTCAnother fact is that Covid-19 has never been isolated. Freedom of Information requests from around the world ALL returned responses clearly indicating no isolated form of Covid-19 exists. So they created a fake pandemic over a virus that's never even been proven to exist.
-
2023-08-27 at 2:22 PM UTC
-
2023-08-27 at 2:26 PM UTC
-
2023-08-27 at 2:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump Why tho?
It's kinda ridiculous how mild this genetically engineered global pandemic virus turned out to be.
Normally viruses compete with each other, if they're under attack from the immune system rapid expansion and destroying the host leads to a more aggressive response. If the different mutations are ignored by the immune response the more aggressive ones are the ones that reproduce and outcompete the others -
2023-08-27 at 2:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite What part is bullshit?
The part about "none of the elites getting vaxxed". I mean whatever, believe what you want, but again: the plot as I've spelled it out ITT makes a fuckload more sense than the one that intentionally leaves you alive to resist the NWO. Nobody ever seems to have an answer for why the NWO would go with the plan that *doesn't work on their enemies*. -
2023-08-27 at 2:37 PM UTC"We could release a deadly virus and kill off our unvaxxed enemies and x% of the leakily-vaccinated population, or release a bioweapon under the guise of a vaccine our enemies won't take and kill off almost everyone else. Mr. Soros, what should we do?"
"Execute Order 69. Kill our faithful followers and spare the conspiracy theorists and QANON militiamen." -
2023-08-27 at 2:52 PM UTCThere is a way to make it make sense... but it'd require you to admit you're all morons and that they'd prefer to spare you because your lineages are dysgenic and retarded, and will therefore be easier to control in the long term. 🤔
(You might want to argue that the constant presence of enemies gives them opportunities for security theater. "INGSOC was always at war with someone" - a nice 1984 reference, since you retards love that story so much. Thing is, they can make enemies of the state out of anyone. Why else would they want it to be you, aside from the fact that you're all demonstrably retarded and incapable of critical thinking?)
Originally posted by aldra To be clear I don't think it's a 'depopulation tool', rather a lot of small-hats used their positions to take advantage of the situation to push what they saw as THE FUTURE OF MEDICINE without any of that pesky, expensive safety testing and it's backfiring spectacularly.
That is of course assuming the theory that the vaccines are coded to create second-generation sterility isn't true. If it is we're headed for a Children of Men scenario and I really didn't like that movie
This is pretty much where my head is at, I just hate this specific conspiracy theory and its proponents since it doesn't make any fucking sense. It's literally just schizos trying to envision a world in which they defeat the NWO. A zombie apocalypse fantasy where they get to take potshots at blue helmets instead of the walking dead. ie "Red Dawn, but it's the NWO's UN forces instead of Russia", and they're the Wolverines.
In my version of the scenario, I probably die during the famines stage. I'm a welfare leach and would absolutely rebel against their bs - they don't want me alive any more than they want these retarded schizos. That's the crux of it: in my schizo theories, the good guys lose. In their schizo theories, they survive to fight another day (of course). And nobody seems to have any kind of explanation for why the fuck the NWO'd do it that way. It's just a circlejerk. They can't countenance a theory in which they are doomed. It's cope. -
2023-08-27 at 3:07 PM UTC
-
2023-08-27 at 3:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker This from they guy who got a highlighter stuck up his ass, told the world about it, and then cut off his balls.
Consider: that nigga's been styling on the retards ITT. If I'm a moron, the people who believe this shit need to wear bicycle helmets when they go outside. -
2023-08-27 at 3:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai … Nobody ever seems to have an answer for why the NWO would go with the plan that *doesn't work on their enemies*.
You're completely missing the fact that they want everybody dead. It's not a matter of left or right or friends or enemies. EVRYBODY has to go. All these fools who are helping them won't fare any better than the rest. Their usefulness has already run out. It was planned to run out. -
2023-08-27 at 3:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Consider: that nigga's been styling on the retards ITT. If I'm a moron, the people who believe this shit need to wear bicycle helmets when they go outside.
Believing whatever is not the only reason one a need helmets.
For example, had you a Bush Butt Helmet back in the day you might never have highlighted your hersey highway.
-
2023-08-27 at 3:52 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ You're completely missing the fact that they want everybody dead. It's not a matter of left or right or friends or enemies. EVRYBODY has to go. All these fools who are helping them won't fare any better than the rest. Their usefulness has already run out. It was planned to run out.
90% of people have to go. Not *everyone*. Why would you want a relatively massive proportion of the survivors to be your most committed enemies, if you could easily avoid that in the manner I've laid out ITT. 🤦🏻♀️
They want to kill MOST people. They want to maintain a class of supplicant slaves, because the comforts of modern society require a society to maintain. The NWO aren't anprims. They don't want to return to monke. They want a shining city on a hill to rule from/over. They want mostly-automated luxury gay space feudalism. So why, dear Speckles, would they go with what I'm calling "your" plan over "mine"? Why would they favor a strategy with so many obvious flaws which [not at all] coincidentally flatters your ego, when there are so many benefits to killing you off? -
2023-08-27 at 3:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai 90% of people have to go. Not *everyone*. Why would you want a relatively massive proportion of the survivors to be your most committed enemies, if you could easily avoid that in the manner I've laid out ITT. 🤦🏻♀️
They want to kill MOST people. They want to maintain a class of supplicant slaves, because the comforts of modern society require a society to maintain. The NWO aren't anprims. They don't want to return to monke. They want a shining city on a hill to rule from/over. They want mostly-automated luxury gay space feudalism. So why, dear Speckles, would they go with what I'm calling "your" plan over "mine"? Why would they favor a strategy with so many obvious flaws which [not at all] coincidentally flatters your ego, when there are so many benefits to killing you off?
If 90% of people were killed everyone left would be an enemy to those responsibile. -
2023-08-27 at 4 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai 90% of people have to go. Not *everyone*. Why would you want a relatively massive proportion of the survivors to be your most committed enemies, if you could easily avoid that in the manner I've laid out ITT. 🤦🏻♀️
They want to kill MOST people. They want to maintain a class of supplicant slaves, because the comforts of modern society require a society to maintain. The NWO aren't anprims. They don't want to return to monke. They want a shining city on a hill to rule from/over. They want mostly-automated luxury gay space feudalism. So why, dear Speckles, would they go with what I'm calling "your" plan over "mine"? Why would they favor a strategy with so many obvious flaws which [not at all] coincidentally flatters your ego, when there are so many benefits to killing you off?
The Plan is simple: kill everybody. Both the slaves and the rebels. What don't you understand about that?