User Controls

Join date has changed

  1. #1
    Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    It went from 24/6/2015 to... whatever/2016. What happened?
  2. #2
    I think an update caused a glitch that set everyone's accounts to that.
  3. #3
    Maybe to keep our resident fags from shitting on people because "i was here before you"
  4. #4
    Originally posted by Kolokol-1 Maybe to keep our resident fags from shitting on people because "i was here before you"

    Those user numbers tho.
  5. #5
    Originally posted by Dargo Those user numbers tho.

    Seems like most people still don't know about those though
  6. #6
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    When I switched the forum software I didn't include join dates in the migration script, actually it wasn't clear that vB was storing them at all. So everyone who joined before then now has the same join time of when the mig script was run.
  7. #7
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    If VBulletin hadn't been storing them, where would they have been stored?
  8. #8
    lanny did 9/11
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. #9
    Ajax African Astronaut [rumor the placative aphakia]
    I prided myself in being a newer fag than all the oldfags. Now I look like a regular cuck of an oldfag.
  10. #10
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by greenplastic lanny did 9/11
  11. #11
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL If VBulletin hadn't been storing them, where would they have been stored?

    nowhere, I'm not sure vb5 showed a join date field. It's not necessary to any other function really. Or if it did it could have figured it based on something else like when activation emails were sent or something. Or it could have been there and I just didn't see the column when I was looking at the schema.
  12. #12
    Number13 African Astronaut [dispute my snotty-nosed seagull]
    Originally posted by Dargo Those user numbers tho.

    Do those actually show anything though? I mean yours is 3246 and that's both a massive amount to bot sign up and I think far far more users than this site ever had.
    Did it ever get randomised lanster?
  13. #13
    Originally posted by Number13 Do those actually show anything though? I mean yours is 3246 and that's both a massive amount to bot sign up and I think far far more users than this site ever had.
    Did it ever get randomised lanster?

    Nah, just a lot of bots and spamming faggots
  14. #14
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Number13 Do those actually show anything though? I mean yours is 3246 and that's both a massive amount to bot sign up and I think far far more users than this site ever had.
    Did it ever get randomised lanster?

    Technically the id number order is undefined so that the DB can make some optimizations by not needing to maintain that constraint. There are situations like when two user creation transactions are live simultaneously that it's advantageous to set aside ids when the transactions start, not knowing which is going to finish first, so you don't have to rollback and reexecute if they don't finish in the expected order. Or if one fails but had the preceding PK but the other already completed, there's just no way to rollback once the transaction is committed. In practice though it's fairly rare and the number of concurrent transactions like this is pretty low so if your id is lower than someone else's it's very likely you joined before them.

    The reason some people's ids are high is because we get a lot of spambots and alts. Spectroll claims to have registered a ton in anticipation of being banned but I haven't checked. The actual number of users in the database right now is 3591, although obviously the majority of them have few or no posts.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. #15
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I have one thousand accounts registered.

    jk

    I have one account registered. Lanny is lying. I never claimed to have made any other accounts.
  16. #16
    Originally posted by -SpectraL I have one thousand accounts registered.

    jk

    I have one account registered. Lanny is lying. I never claimed to have made any other accounts.



    Originally posted by -SpectraL I have one thousand accounts registered.

    jk

    I have one account registered. Lanny is lying. I never claimed to have made any other accounts.

    Liar
  17. #17
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Quote me where I ever said I have multiple accounts or shut the fuck up.
  18. #18
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Quote me where I ever said I have multiple accounts or shut the fuck up.

    Well the "You can never ban me and if you do I'll be back within minutes" gig kinda alludes to that.
  19. #19
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Dargo Well the "You can never ban me and if you do I'll be back within minutes" gig kinda alludes to that.

    That doesn't translate to I've made any alt accounts as of this moment. Lanny just made that up out of thin air.
  20. #20
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Quote me where I ever said I have multiple accounts or shut the fuck up.

    Liar
Jump to Top