User Controls

Virtual Fax Machine Software

  1. #61
    Okay the protocol makes sense but why does every software only allow for phone numbers?? can you not send shit through lines besides a NUMBER and VOICE like wasn't that the entire point of dialup in the first place was that you can use other shit on the stuff that exists already and it was all compatible OR AT LEAST SUPPOSED TO BE

    I wonder if you can use fax for proof of work
    every fax essentially becomes an NFT
  2. #62
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    that's just for compatibility

    you could probably just attach an audio recorder to the line and play the tones directly to the fax machine
  3. #63
    you don't even really need the telephone line, the modulated signal is usually .wav format and yeah you can send someone a philez by holding up the EEEEEEEEEEEEAHHHHHHHISSSSSS HISSSSS through a telephone and have someone to pick it up so you BECOME the fax machine there doesn't need to be a machine ITS JUST IN THE AIR MAAAN

    https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Transferring_Data_between_Standard_Dial-Up_Modems
  4. #64
    I speak fax fluently.
  5. #65
    Pretty sure you can encode any audio channeled thing into fax using an algorithmic logic table

    I don't know how they did it before the machines were invented like did you have to sit there and literally calculate a modulated waveform using math and a graphing calculator

    how error prone is that I wonder. THe idea that you need a "fax Machine" to send a fax being integral in sending tele-fascimail is asinine and just another example of everything. I have noticed the TIFF format seems to be the default most popular, and ofc BITMAP the og pimp format , MOVE OVER GAYPEG and .PNiGger

    We are DOWNGRADING also lawl


    I think this is why they are stuck on TIFF and telephone lines because "Keep in mind that this process is a simplified overview, and actual implementation details may vary based on the specific requirements of the audio data, the fax format used, and the tools or libraries you choose to employ. Additionally, fax transmissions are limited in their ability to handle audio data accurately, as they are primarily designed for sending printed documents, not audio signals. For audio transmission, other more suitable methods like VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) or audio file sharing would be more appropriate."

    they want to upgrade the thing but the board body isn't having any of this nonsense
    im sure someone on that board just fucking hates people like me and having to actually a shit about faxes and I bet they just shake their head, those fucks. Fuck boards! I seriously doubt these are "fax hobbyists" like myself

    a more based and wholesome community than retro computing or anything really



    kinda hot ngl

    Wait you can fax JBIGs
    imagine faxxing a .JBIG formatted scan of an ass.
    idk whats going on here exactly but i've fapped to weirder stuff than this
  6. #66
    Meikai Heck This Schlong
    Originally posted by mashlehash Windows 98

    lmao poser shit. windows went mainstream with windows 95, so liking windows 98 is especially some poser shit. i only respect you if you fux with windows 3.1 and even then not really. os/2 or you're basically a nickelback fan talking about harsh noise.
  7. #67
    Originally posted by Meikai lmao poser shit. windows went mainstream with windows 95, so liking windows 98 is especially some poser shit. i only respect you if you fux with windows 3.1 and even then not really. os/2 or you're basically a nickelback fan talking about harsh noise.

    Hey if it runs DOS, I would rather it not because honestly I don't like using software to run a software to run a software, as much as a fan / user of virtualization methods , idk just seems dumb like can't everything just be made in C at the end of the day

    it's always gotta be BORDERLINE SKITZO PASCAL or FIGTRON or some shit I never heard of like E# or Sigma+- BUT LITERALLY EVERYYONE USES IT WHUT DO YOU MEAN I TOOK MY COMPSCI FORSE IN SIGMAPLUSMINUS BRO YOU NEED TO WAKE THE FUCK UP

    like yeah it's ME that's crazy here. PLEASE LOG INTO YOUR OFFLINE SOFTWARE ACCOUNT!!! so I can store and forward it right??? RIGHT??? WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT AUTO CLOSES
    UPON LOGOOUT
    WJHY WOULD YOU DO THAT oh it's the api doing that
    SO MAYBE DOn"T FUCKING USE APIS for EVERYTHING

    I should just shut up and fork over the cash , and stop caring BUT IT MAKES ME SO MAD YOU LITERALLY Don'T NEED A PHONE NUMBER I don't wanna be a dudley d0-nothing shit o my hands while these guys have all the fun destroying the entire global telecoms scam market. I wanna throw a molotov too! an OPEN SOURCE ONE right at the fucking window!!!
    Originally posted by Big the Cat THe idea that you need a "fax Machine" to send a fax being integral in sending tele-fascimail is asinine and just another example of everything.

    not just a fax "machine" but you must NO EXCEPTIONS have a TELEPHONE NUMBER!!! # HASH TAG 7 DIGIT FORMAT AND AREA CODES EXT ONLY!!! NO +1234chingchong.io:1337:27 that's not ISPN POP3 COMPATIBLE SIR!!! THAT S A FUCKING WHATSAPP VOIP SCHTICK A HACKED PHONELINE INTO A SHAREED NUMBER FOR A PIECE OF SHIT SOFTWARE THAT I CAN'T GET TO WORK EITHER!

    9 years ago

    LOL AT THE TIN CANS WITH STRING UFUCKING LOL CAN YOU SEND A BITCOIN DOING THAT I WONDER???
    really we got NOTHING done in 9 years???? watch what I do in ONE YEAR motherfuckers we're gonna have fax based crypto and all kinds of shit just you watch.
  8. #68
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Meikai lmao poser shit. windows went mainstream with windows 95, so liking windows 98 is especially some poser shit. i only respect you if you fux with windows 3.1 and even then not really. os/2 or you're basically a nickelback fan talking about harsh noise.

    I remember seeing ads for OS/2: WARP!!!

    never used it though

    didn't even use lunix until the early 2000s and I didn't get why anyone bothered until later
  9. #69
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Big the Cat Hey if it runs DOS, I would rather it not because honestly I don't like using software to run a software to run a software, as much as a fan / user of virtualization methods , idk just seems dumb like can't everything just be made in C at the end of the day

    I remember when I was a kid I told my dad's friend that DOSSHELL was gay and there's no reason to use it

    probably the first time I got in trouble for calling things gay
  10. #70
    I am just a retard that grew up too much on windows GOOOEY ui's and I like to click 10x10 16 bit color icons to run executables at ring zero privilege , because it's more fun! it makes children smile. using command lines doesn't make them smile UNLESS YOU CAN MAKE IT DO ASCCIISPAMMMMMMMMM or "hey kid , type "tree" |
    __~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~''
    v
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |>[ https://eleni.mutantstargoat.com/hikiko/holy-days/ ]
    |
    This post is mostly instructions on how to install the Temple OS on Debian using VirtualBox. Temple OS is an operating system written |from scratch by Terry A. Davis in order to make programming and the creation of games more fun. Its shell is a Holy-C compiler where users |can write commands in Holy-C and see the generated assembly. Temple OS lacks networking and security. Every program runs in ring-0 mode, |which means that it has full access to the hardware. This is on purpose, “because it’s fun”. As Terry said, he didn’t want to write another |UNIX and his goal was to create a modern Commodore64-like OS where the users can start writing code immediately after boot. If you are not
    |familiar with the Temple OS and Terry A. Davis’s story, you can check the links at the end of this post.
    L--------------------------------------------^
  11. #71
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    lol protected mode came in DOS, I don't think even win 3.11 let you run shit in ring zero
  12. #72
    having all of these fax softwares coded in visual basic DOES NOT HELP I went through like 20 codebases

    they have basically "hack modes" that run the programs essentially from the command line which apparently according to all my research I don't see why it even needs the phone number that case if you can essentially run it like a PUSH PULL canister , I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT NETWORKING OR UNDERSTAND WATS GOING ON

    I love trying to describe things I don't understand!


    what I do know: "push pull" is sure used in a lot of different settings applied to logics. I call it the logical push pull, you either push your push pull concept onto a ideas or you try to pull it off of it or something

    https://www.ranker.com/list/unseen-fax-from-hunter-thompson-to-keith-richards-v1/rmach

    lol the mojo wire. I think theres a open source software called mojofax

    In the twenty-three years that we worked together, it was usually from different time zones: he was on the road, in a hotel, or writing in Woody Creek in the dead of night. I Was always in New York, as steady as a pyramid, as Hunter liked to say. Our collaboration was by telephone and fax, except for the earliest days, when we relied on the so-called Mojo Wire.

    For the record, the Mojo Wire was Hunter's nickname for the Xerox telecopier, a primitive, pre-FAX system that required two large spinning machines, special paper, hours of long-distance charges, and a sleep-deprived human attendant at each end. Hunter would wrap a page of finished typed copy around the Mojo Wire's rotating drum, and hit the SEND button. At our end, the dram slowly began to turn and a needlelike device hopped around like an industrial lathe, carving out the images of Hunter's prose while it emitted acrid little puffs of titanium dioxide. A miracle at only six minutes a page.

    what teh fuc
    https://thenotfakenews.com/2020/02/10/fear-and-loathing-2020-coke-on-the-mojo-wire/

  13. #73
    Originally posted by aldra lol protected mode came in DOS, I don't think even win 3.11 let you run shit in ring zero

    PUSSIES!!! yeah that's right about when microsoft started going downhill. I have seen quite a few articles from JOHN C Dvorak talking about how they buy up good software and just kill it, right into the ground. Really puts linux in perspective like it's almost exists only because of how fucking EVIL and fucked M$ and their pajit army is

    https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/08/the-age-of-the-fax-machine-is-finally-coming-to-an-end/242660/

    treating fax like a dead phone cash cow IT'S PROBABLY GONNA BE HOW EVERYTHING GETS SENT IN SPACE, WHO KNOWS!! we'll never find out with them running things i tell you hwhat

    Originally posted by Big the Cat what I do know: "push pull" is sure used in a lot of different settings applied to logics.

    https://erowid.org/archive/rhodium/crystalcreations/pushpull.html

    FAX ME THAT METH SYNTH THROUGH THE MOJO WIRE GOOD SIR IN BRAINFUCK-BIGBMP
  14. #74
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    there's a good reason for protecting memory segments; why do you want to run everything in ring zero?

    what good are encryption keys if any application you run can just pull them out of active memory?
  15. #75
    Originally posted by aldra there's a good reason for protecting memory segments; why do you want to run everything in ring zero?

    what good are encryption keys if any application you run can just pull them out of active memory?

    Don't store them in memory , OBVIOUSLY! the need to do that is a spook, and annoying and retarded. HURR DURR JUST USE A PASSWORD MANAGER ITS EASY. Yeeeeaaaaaaa i use like 20 and remember a total of zero of the passwords and frequently lock myself out of all kinds of shit

    and then it gets all skitzo that im trying to sign up a 4th time without a VPN like fuck off just give me a break here HOW ABOUT PUTTING THE PASSWORD REQUIREMENTS IN THE FIELD INSTEAD OF NOT PUTTTING IT ANYWHERE EXCEPT THE CREATE ACCOUNT SCREEN.

    It's all made wrong, running wrong, on things that are made wrong and running retarded.
    HolyC has no formal build system. You just compile a file and you're done. If your project spans more than one file, you just #include all the files into one and compile that. The compiler can compile 50000 lines of code in less than a second.

    When you hit F5 in the editor, the program is JIT compiled and run. The top-level statements are executed in turn, and your task is now loaded and ready. If your top-level statements included any sort of loop, it'll stay running there. Otherwise you'll be dropped back into a new shell. However, the shell exists within your task, so you can interactively use it as a REPL and start calling functions inside your program.

    Does your current IDE support links to documentation?

    Or, perhaps you might place a call to Dbg() somewhere in your program, or hit Ctrl-Alt-D, and be dropped directly into the debugger at that point. The debugger of course, still functions as an interactive REPL. Does your IDE support a drop-in REPL?

    How much support code does it take to open a window and draw graphics into it on your operating system? In TempleOS, there is a one-to-one correspondence between tasks and windows, so a single call to DCAlias is enough to return the device context for your window. You can just do this as soon as your main function is called and draw into it. Making a window is surely the most important thing for a windowed operating system - why does it have to be hard? GDI, X11, DirectX and OpenGL could all learn something here.
    Hardware & Security

    There is no hardware support. By that I mean that TempleOS does not support any hardware other than the minimal core system that makes a PC. There is no support for any graphics card other than VGA, there is no support for any soundcard other than the PC speaker, and there is no support for networking.

    TempleOS does not use memory protection. All code in the system runs at ring 0, the highest privilege level, meaning that a stray pointer write could easily crash the entire system. This is a very deliberate design choice:

    if it cant run off TempleOS natively, it aint' it IMHO. Everything should have store and forward packet low power apocalypse mode as a default like whatever the fuck ANSI error codes were ACTUALLY 'SUPPOSED TO BE' used for. Like we have all this extended ASCII utsf69 emoji support but literally i've only seen it used by the most skizo of video game devs, and I'm pretty sure my digital thermostat is using the snowflake ASCII and it's not a graphic icon
    WOW *claps* IMPRESSIVE!!



    Your face when fax scAms is kept alive so google and literally every other email free provider can justify needing PHONE NUMBER VERIFICATION TO HELP FIGHT AGAINST THE ROBOT MENACE ! yeah thats cool but how about taking email or fax???? Nah it needs to be a US based number, goy OH LIKE YOU MEAN THE ONES THAT VOIP COMPANIES BUY AND SELL , NOPE!!!

    Originally posted by aldra what good are encryption keys if any application you run can just pull them out of active memory?

    nobody should know the keys, not even the software and it should not be sent at all to anyone. Sometjhing something the byzantine general
    remote serverless cloud hosting storage & Gnunet p2p. Basically the internet is made wrong, and so is everything running to/from it. It can't be easily fixed either because the technology to do any of this simply does not exist because nobody wants to make it when you can make a career charging companies THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS for fax "boards" with 25 physical band lines WOW CAN YOU FIT 25 NUMBERS ON THAT LITERAL $10k PIECE OF HARDWARE THAT oNLY DOES `1 THING OR DO YOU JUST SHOOT IT TO A SERVER THAT PRETTY MUCH MAKES THAT USELESS BECAUSE YOU JUST nEED One NUMBER TO HOOK IT UP TO INFINITE FAXES
  16. #76
    lol I gotta check the details on that $10k fax board, pretty sure you gotta encrypt it yourself too and unlike modern telnet clients doesn't auto encyrpt SHA-256 everything like FUCKING DIALUP BBS BOARD are literally doing right now. Nah, your company paying thousands of dollars can just hire someone to figure that out ! xD
  17. #77
    this was the cheap model 8 PORTS WHAT A CUCK LMAO

    https://www.ifax.com/product/mainpine-iq-express-rf6124-8-port-fax-board/

    I can run literally 20,000 limit node telnet nodes and have them talk to eachother with zero phone numbers and minimum dos virtualization AND THAT INCLUDES TALKING TO SYNCRONET WHICH BASICALLY IS A FREE FAX SERVER (with the right doors) I would say it's about as complicated as downloading VLC to view video philez , or an ANSI art viewer level of complexity

    AND YOU FUCKERS WANT ME TO PAY PER MONTH/ PAGE ARE YOU INSANE??


    Mainpine IQ Express RF6124 8 Port Fax Board
    $3,569.99
    PCI Express boards for compact-sized computers
    Fits in 1X, 4X, 8X or 16X PCIe slots
    For use with eight analog phone lines
    V.34 fax / JBIG Compression
    Includes Standard and Low Profile Brackets
    Product comes with two(2) 4-line splitters for a total of 8 RJ11 phone lines
    30-Day satisfaction guarantee
    5-Year hardware warranty

    Specifications
    Physical Dimensions

    6.60″ x 2.52″ (Low Profile bracket)
    6.60″ x 4.72″ (Standard Profile Bracket)

    Operating Systems

    Windows XP * Windows XP only supports 1-phone line for fax
    Windows Vista Business Edition * Windows Vista Business supports 1-phone only
    Windows 7 * Windows 7 supports 1-phone only
    Windows 8 * Windows 8 supports 1-phone only
    Windows 10 * Windows 10 supports 1-phone only
    Windows Server 2003
    Windows Server 2008 RC1 and RC2
    Windows Server 2012 RC1 and RC2
    Windows Server 2016
    Linux

    * 32- and 64- bit support for all operating system versions above
    Warranty

    30-Day satisfaction guarantee
    5-Year hardware warranty

    Hardware

    POTS: Two RJ61 Connectors
    56 MIPS CPU per port
    120 MIPS DSP per port
    Global DAA
    Software controlled hardware reset per port
    Software readable 48bit serial number
    Single interrupt per board
    Power consumption: Less than 1 Watt
    Mix-and-match Mainpine and third-party hardware

    * Product comes with two(2) 4-line splitters for a total of 8 RJ11 phone lines.
    Fax Specifications

    ITU-T V.34 (Super G3), V.17, V.29, V.27 ter, V.21 ch. 2, and V.8 Call Establishment
    ITU-T T.30, T.31 (Service Class 1, 1.0, 2.0, 2.1)
    ECM Error Correction Mode
    MH, MR, MMR, JBIG and JPEG Compression
    Normal, fine, superfine, hyperfine and ultrafine resolution
    Color fax support

    Environmental

    Operating temperature: 0 – 50 C
    Storage temperature: -20 – 85 C
    Relative humidity: 10% – 80%
    Non-condensing Altitude: 0 – 3660m

    Standards and Approvals

    Manufacturing: BS EN ISO 9001:2000
    Telecom: TIA 968-A (FCC Part 68), IC CS03, TS 103 021 (TBR21)
    EMC: FCC Part 15, ICES-003, EN 55022, EN 55024
    Safety: UL 60950, CSA 60950, EN 60950
    Environmental: EU 2002/95/EC (“RoHS”), EU 2002/96/EC (“WEEE”), EN 50419
    CE Mark
    PCI Express Base 1.0a



    this is way funnier than "Using fax in 2023 lmao who does that!" only 99% of Japanese businesses and 60% of households there!! that's WHOM
    and they all do it for free because they aren't choking on indian telecom cock like the west
  18. #78
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Big the Cat Don't store them in memory , OBVIOUSLY! the need to do that is a spook, and annoying and retarded.

    how do you encrypt or decrypt anything without storing the keys in memory?

    how do you write a word without being able to think of letters?
  19. #79
    Originally posted by aldra how do you write a word without being able to think of letters?



    Just draw the shape with ya hands, wut. It 's not like you need to know what it means. In fact it's probably easier to learn copying someones signature in other languages like bhutanese shadow script or ching chong

    because I do not exist as a ching chong I have to BECOME a person to even write it in the first place. I cannot think of any letters in any asian language but I could probably write it if you told me to learn caligraphy and just didn't tell me anything language learning related as CALIGRAPHY is a different skill entirely



    I am good at neither and expect to be able to understand everything at all times, because it should just be easy to move things and interact with them. Signing in sucks, clicking the GOOGLE OR MICROSOFT button sucks, web3 sucks too! make it FASTER FASTER FASTER and not scanning my eye WE TRIED THAT ALREADY I remember when finger scanners were the rage

    fuck that technology burn biometric anything to the fucking ground, it's trash and I WILL chop off someones hand fucking gladly I will relish the moment, TALK ABOUT BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS. Feeds DATA!!! into the MACHINE

    yeah zk is pretty fucking skitzo I honestly can't explain how it works. I'm sure i've tried more than once

    how to solve byzantine general while blindfolded and blackout drunk??? idk ... kill the general? praise justinian and surrender your forces to CHRIST! in a final all out no holds barred charge, fuck the orders!

    oh fuck it's got an oracle. YEAH I'm OUT but it's on scientific journals and shit idk seems skitzo but also I kinda get it at the same time its like terry davis HOW DO YOU PROVE A RANDOM NUMBER IS RANDOM???? or as "true random" as you can get. The answer ORACLES . Billion $$$ companies fuys! I have no idea what any of it means but my guess is fedcoin will be Godtek and you won't have SHIT to say then you can't call it a ryptoo doo daw slow Tx time block hash, nah it will be fast and god protocols but used for evil I think kinda like EL PETRO

    Like you can turn anything into a closed system and just physically punish and arrest anyone that goes against your system. The economy wars oh man imagine instead of markets countries actually COMPETE like not GLOBAL US DOLLAR but using their superior technology to make your entire existence worthless type shit, which I can't even fathom



    How Bitcoin Solves the Byzantine General’s Problem?

    In the Byzantine Generals Problem, the untampered agreement that all the loyal generals need to agree to is the blockchain. Blockchain is a public, distributed ledger that contains the records of all transactions. If all users of the Bitcoin network, known as nodes, could agree on which transactions occurred and in what order, they could verify the ownership and create a functioning, trustless money system without the need for a centralized authority. Due to its decentralized nature, blockchain relies heavily on a consensus technique to validate transactions. It is a peer-to-peer network that offers its users transparency as well as trust. Its distributed ledger is what sets it apart from other systems. Blockchain technology can be applied to any system that requires proper verification.

    Proof Of Work: The network would have to be provable, counterfeit-resistant, and trust-free in order to solve the Byzantine General’s Problem. Bitcoin overcame the Byzantine General’s Problem by employing a Proof-of-Work technique to create a clear, objective regulation for the blockchain. Proof of work (PoW) is a method of adding fresh blocks of transactions to the blockchain of a cryptocurrency. In this scenario, the task consists of creating a hash (a long string of characters) that matches the desired hash for the current block.

    Counterfeit Resistant: Proof-of-Work requires network participants to present proof of their work in the form of a valid hash in order for their block, i.e. piece of information, to be regarded as valid. Proof-of-Work requires miners to expend significant amounts of energy and money in order to generate blocks, encouraging them to broadcast accurate information and so protecting the network. Proof-of-Work is one of the only ways for a decentralized network to agree on a single source of truth, which is essential for a monetary system. There can be no disagreement or tampering with the information on the blockchain network because the rules are objective. The ruleset defining which transactions are valid and which are invalid, as well as the system for choosing who can mint new bitcoin, are both objectives.
    Provable: Once a block is uploaded to the blockchain, it is incredibly difficult to erase, rendering Bitcoin’s history immutable. As a result, participants of the blockchain network may always agree on the state of the blockchain and all transactions inside it. Each node independently verifies whether blocks satisfy the Proof-of-Work criterion and whether transactions satisfy additional requirements.
    Trust-free: If any network member attempts to broadcast misleading information, all network nodes immediately detect it as objectively invalid and ignore it. Because each node on the Bitcoin network can verify every information on the network, there is no need to trust other network members, making Bitcoin a trustless system.

    ETH butalkik is bigly into this I think that's what DA ETHEREUM MERGE from PoW to POS was all about this, which still isn't fully implemented in ETH yet
  20. #80
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    I'm not talking about saving logins

    in order for your computer to encrypt or decrypt data it needs to know keys, and those keys need to be kept private
Jump to Top