User Controls

If you have less than 2.1 children and complain about immigrants

  1. #1
    Ghost Black Hole
    Then you are a retard
  2. #2
    non sequitur
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. #3
    Ghost Black Hole
  4. #4
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson non sequitur
  5. #5
    Originally posted by Ghost

    Looks like our planet has a bright future ahead of it.
  6. #6
    Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson

    you're literally an immigrant, you have no say in this. The least you could do is give Americans some more whites LOL

    I meet plenty ofBRITISH couples here that have kids here THEY ARE DOING THEIR PART, whats your excuse?
  7. #7
    Originally posted by Ghost you're literally an immigrant, you have no say in this. The least you could do is give Americans some more whites LOL

    I meet plenty ofBRITISH couples here that have kids here THEY ARE DOING THEIR PART, whats your excuse?



    Well I wasn't an immigrant when I lived in England for 30yrs now was I...


    Doing "your" part would NOT be having kids, more humans is the LAST thing we need
  8. #8
    The non sequitur is in assuming you have to have kids to complain about immigrants...the two are irrelevant to each other.

    Having MORE kids isn't going to lower the immigration rate dumbo.

    Juan in El Salvador: "I was gonna go to America but I heard Jim and Mary in New York had 2.1 kids so that ended that plan"
  9. #9
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Donald Trump Looks like our planet has a bright future ahead of it.

    do not stare directly into the rape
  10. #10
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    immigrants are used as a hammer to drive down wages and flood the labour market, making it more difficult for citizens to afford children and a decent quality of life for them.

    having more kids you can't afford won't stop THEM from continuing to enact OPERATION MUDSLIDE
  11. #11
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Ghost

    also, most of those places in Africa that people are worried about population explosions don't even have running water, so I wouldn't put all that much stock in their census data and population projections
  12. #12
    Originally posted by aldra also, most of those places in Africa that people are worried about population explosions don't even have running water, so I wouldn't put all that much stock in their census data and population projections

    Dunno. My experience of Africa was that every bush in the wilderness seem to have a nigger behind it.
  13. #13
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson The non sequitur is in assuming you have to have kids to complain about immigrants…the two are irrelevant to each other.

    Having MORE kids isn't going to lower the immigration rate dumbo.

    Juan in El Salvador: "I was gonna go to America but I heard Jim and Mary in New York had 2.1 kids so that ended that plan"

    it's not really Juan that's the problem, people will always want to immigrate and you can't stop them from trying without a police force in every foreign country

    the problem is Senator Shlomo telling the border guards not to guard the border and enacting policies that not only give Juan free passage and board, but encourage him to bring his entire extended family over too
  14. #14
    My wealthy left wing boss once asked me "Why are you so anti immigrant when you are one yourself, they only want to work and build a better life"

    I said "I'm not anti immigrant I'm anti ILLEGAL immigrant...and I only want a Ferrari and a house by the ocean..why can't I have them?"
  15. #15
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson My wealthy left wing boss once asked me "Why are you so anti immigrant when you are one yourself, they only want to work and build a better life"

    I said "I'm not anti immigrant I'm anti ILLEGAL immigrant…and I only want a Ferrari and a house by the ocean..why can't I have them?"

    It's not that simple. Partly you hate brown people, but even if they were white you'd hate them cos there are too many of them and they contribute nothing but poverty and overpopulation.

    All people are bad and all immigrants are bad. Some are interesting or productive enough that you overlook the inconvenience of having them around.
  16. #16
    Originally posted by Donald Trump It's not that simple. Partly you hate brown people, but even if they were white you'd hate them cos there are too many of them and they contribute nothing but poverty and overpopulation.

    All people are bad and all immigrants are bad. Some are interesting or productive enough that you overlook the inconvenience of having them around.

    I don't hate anyone...to hate them you have to give a shit about them.

    I do hate "systems" though that remove responsibility from the individual in favor of a social system that wipes their ass for them.

    It's a dog eat dog world...if you want better work for it, don't milk off others...if your country is shit...make it better don't leave it etc.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. #17
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I don't hate anyone…to hate them you have to give a shit about them.

    I do hate "systems" though that remove responsibility from the individual in favor of a social system that wipes their ass for them.

    It's a dog eat dog world…if you want better work for it, don't milk off others…if your country is shit…make it better don't leave it etc.

    Cope. That assumes individuals have the ability to change their lives for the better. In many cases they're too dumb or low agency, so it's impossible.
  18. #18
    Originally posted by Donald Trump Cope. That assumes individuals have the ability to change their lives for the better. In many cases they're too dumb or low agency, so it's impossible.

    It's no assumption, the majority of people can change their lives for the better. As for those that can't..that's life, survival of the fittest...the weak fall by the wayside..darwinism..etc.

    How dumb is it to support the weaker members of society at cost to the strongest...Look how well that's been working in the last 30-40yrs...
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. #19
    A utopian society would require all members to be productive contributors, not leaches. If you can't pull your weight it's off to the euthanasia center with you.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. #20
    Haxxor Space Nigga
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson A utopian society would require all members to be productive contributors, not leaches. If you can't pull your weight it's off to the euthanasia center with you.

    All in all not a bad idea.
Jump to Top