User Controls
tfw to smart
-
2017-05-15 at 9:18 AM UTCI am considerably smarter than yoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
. -
2017-05-15 at 9:35 AM UTCWtf is this thread I don't even
-
2017-05-15 at 11:32 AM UTCWhats the difference?
-
2017-05-15 at 12:28 PM UTCTeach me something OP
-
2017-05-15 at 1:17 PM UTCThe sheer amount of autism in these brain images and the baiting and circlejerking, on whatever tier of irony it is, is truly outstanding. Shouldn't you be stacking legos or some other object really really high, Phoenix?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-05-15 at 1:17 PM UTC
Post last edited by -SpectraL at 2017-05-15T13:27:49.766889+00:00 -
2017-05-15 at 1:48 PM UTC
-
2017-05-15 at 1:49 PM UTC
-
2017-05-15 at 2 PM UTC
Originally posted by Phoenix I argue everywhere I can, because healthy debate is one of the most mentally stimulating activities one can engage in. Reducing what I do to mere "argument" is fallacious at best. I'm a student and an educator by trade. Of course, you wouldn't know anything about engaging in such rigorously cerebral pursuits.
It shows.
"youtube comments"
"healthy debate"
roflmao -
2017-05-15 at 5:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by DocFoster The sheer amount of autism in these brain images and the baiting and circlejerking, on whatever tier of irony it is, is truly outstanding. Shouldn't you be stacking legos or some other object really really high, Phoenix?
I personally prefer to immaculately order expansive arrays of colored pencils into neat and near perfect gradients/spectrums to reflect the spectrum I'm so very clearly on.
Originally posted by greenplastic "youtube comments"
"healthy debate"
roflmao
I legitimately get healthier debate there than I currently am from you, you astoundingly banal ignoramus.
-
2017-05-15 at 5:55 PM UTChe's not wrong, NIS is several steps below youtube in terms of intellectual capacity.
-
2017-05-15 at 6:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by snab_snib he's not wrong, NIS is several steps below youtube in terms of intellectual capacity.
We're also a tiny fraction of their population. Our best vs YouTube's best could hold their own. This of course includes beratement and heavy doses of vitriol as a contributing factor to winning the overall debate. -
2017-05-15 at 6:17 PM UTC
-
2017-05-15 at 6:24 PM UTC
-
2017-05-15 at 6:26 PM UTC
-
2017-05-15 at 6:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Phonenix/HTS actually does come off as very, unusually, intelligent, but like many of us here he's incredibly fucked up and dysfunctional.
I would really like to see what he scores on a professionally administered IQ test, especially if he wasn't severely depressed, maybe given some ADD medication or better yet 2-FMA.
Or he could just have a high verbal IQ, which is still very good, you can do a lot with it, and it actually seems to be the most important correlation with positive life outcomes.
But, yeah, like me, it doesn't matter how smart you may be if you don't actually do anything with it and even, for whatever reason, use it against yourself to engage in these incredibly self-destructive pathological behaviors.
He seems smart to you because you are a walking, talking textbook case of the Dunning-Kruger effect, and xe's marginally smarter than you are. -
2017-05-15 at 6:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by Phoenix I'd say that's up for debate.
not really. anyone whose smart doesn't debate, because debate is a bubble-wrapped safe-space intellectual masturbation for people who aren't as smart as they think they are so they try to be smart in controlled environments that protect them and defeat the entire purpose of being smart. if they were smart, they'd be doing something productive, not having fucking refereed arguments like a retard to stroke their ego.
debate is for idiots. -
2017-05-15 at 6:33 PM UTC
-
2017-05-15 at 6:38 PM UTC
-
2017-05-15 at 7:04 PM UTC6210001000
