User Controls

Military Genius Zelensky wants Ukrainians to throw molotovs at Russian tanks

  1. Originally posted by aldra do you know how much energy that'd take? even modern crematoriums don't bother trying to burn bones, they grind them up after everything else burns away

    all those banned white phosphor munition need somewhere to go.
  2. Originally posted by aldra do you know how much energy that'd take? even modern crematoriums don't bother trying to burn bones, they grind them up after everything else burns away

    But I was told that human bodies burn just like logs.
  3. Originally posted by Donald Trump But I was told that human bodies burn just like logs.

    you dont really need to burn the bodies to ashes. just enough to make them not smell, easy to handle and not breed bacterias,
  4. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    丸太
  5. so thats how they "spell" it.
  6. Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/01/07/russia-ukraine-putin-collapse-disintegration-civil-war-empire/
  7. Originally posted by aldra do you know how much energy that'd take? even modern crematoriums don't bother trying to burn bones, they grind them up after everything else burns away

    Could coat the camos in jet fuel. If it can melt steel, it can melt human bodies.
  8. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    I wonder if 50 Bradley IFVs will make a difference on any front.

    the point of IFVs over APCs is the higher firing position which helps a lot in urban warfare, but with how many man-portable anti-tank and anti-material weapons are around they haven't really been used inside the cities.

    the main use of Bradleys here would be the TOWs and advanced optics to try and snipe tanks at range, but Russia's fielding BMPTs as tanker support with more ATAKA ATGMs that significantly outrange them. there's also the option of REFLEKS tank-launched ATGMs but I haven't heard any reports of them being used in the theatre.


    in this role I don't really see the benefit to using them over any other (cheaper) anti-tank weapon
  9. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by aldra

    twitter account this was posted from has since been deleted so I'm not sure about accuracy, and I can't find the actual mobilisation directive.

    if true, any male between 18-60 can expect to be drafted, can't enter into a marriage or start a new job, and being overseas for study/work will no longer get you out of it either. Ukrainian embassies in other countries arer directed to send them back.

    Imagine gathering Intel from Twitter
  10. Originally posted by aldra in this role I don't really see the benefit to using them over any other (cheaper) anti-tank weapon

    thats because your not looking at the bigger picture.

    someone, somewhere, is now short of 50 breadleys and will now have to buy new ones as a replacement.

    btw, bradley fighting vehicles are gay, just like our bradley, it takes men from behind.
  11. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny thats because your not looking at the bigger picture.

    someone, somewhere, is now short of 50 breadleys and will now have to buy new ones as a replacement.

    btw, bradley fighting vehicles are gay, just like our bradley, it takes men from behind.

    yeah I'm aware the whole thing is a massive money laundering operation
  12. Originally posted by aldra yeah I'm aware the whole thing is a massive money laundering operation

    then why are you wondering if these BFVs have tactical, operational or strategic utilities ?
  13. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny then why are you wondering if these BFVs have tactical, operational or strategic utilities ?

    because when you're laundering money through weapons, you get to thinking whether there's anything you can do with the weapons
  14. Originally posted by aldra because when you're laundering money through weapons, you get to thinking whether there's anything you can do with the weapons

    i dont think thats how the US-MIC works, because then they wouldnt be commissioning so many aircraft carriers.
  15. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i dont think thats how the US-MIC works, because then they wouldnt be commissioning so many aircraft carriers.

    So many?
  16. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson So many?

    even just one is an enormous investment, especially with them now being vulnerable to hypersonics

    US is rumoured to be sending Strykers now as well, would not be surprised if the Ukrainians just use them as artillery ammo transports like the APCs and medical transports they've been sent.

    the Ukrainians want heavy tanks, but among other problems the Abrams and Leopards (most likely candidates) are way too heavy for the region; at almost 70 tonnes they'll obliterate roads, fall through bridges and fuck up pontoon crossings
  17. Originally posted by aldra even just one is an enormous investment

    but 1 isn't "many", neither is 2...or 3...

    I'm questioning the quantity, not the cost.
  18. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by aldra Wagner's taken Soledar, apparently the big hurdle is the Soledar-Bakhmut Salt Mines (lol) which stretch for hundreds of kilometers under the region so it's likely to be a replay of the Azovstahl tunnels

    they're currently mopping up a few pockets of resistance. Ukrainians report they lost 14 battalions so deaths are probably above 10,000 (keep in mind the Ukrainian authorities have a habit of 'laundering' KIAs by listing them as MIA to avoid paying families).
  19. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    https://www.rt.com/news/569648-poland-defense-infantry-division/

    lol, wariat gonna get drafted

    According to the minister, the division will comprise four brigades, separated into four battalions. A division is a military formation, consisting of between 6,000 to 25,000 troops.
  20. Elbow African Astronaut
    Originally posted by aldra the Abrams and Leopards (most likely candidates) are way too heavy for the region; at almost 70 tonnes they'll obliterate roads, fall through bridges and fuck up pontoon crossings



    im not saying i'd want to drive an abrams across a bridge made by slavs, especially former soviet slavs, but what the hell are you talking about? is it just that you've seen the abrams in the desert your whole life and it feels like a "desert tank" to you now or something? the leopard and the abrams are 50 years old, and the product of countries who were both very much taking into consideration that they might have to be driving said tanks through ukraine and into the USSR.

    "they'll fuck up pontoon crossings"? are you high?



    ukraine rivers are very special you see. nothing like bosnian rivers, which can be pontooned by MBTs. ukrainian river water is highly corrosive (on account of chernobyl), and as such pontoons suffer a -50% geographic debuff to structural integrity.

    "they'll obliterate roads"

    no shit. great thing about tanks:

Jump to Top