User Controls
Military Genius Zelensky wants Ukrainians to throw molotovs at Russian tanks
-
2022-11-03 at 6:55 PM UTC
-
2022-11-03 at 7:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker It's funny because it highlights how desperate Putin has become.
he said, increasingly nervously, after it turned out the Russians aren't actually running out of fuel or munitions, and that 'mud' didn't send them home...
meanwhile, in reality
and Arestovich is complaining that they need MORE because their supplies are too low to continue offensive operations (he's probably just trying to squeeze more shekels out, who knows) -
2022-11-03 at 7:15 PM UTCI find it shocking how little the west is actually sending to Ukraine. They're all about words, but short on actions.
-
2022-11-03 at 7:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump I find it shocking how little the west is actually sending to Ukraine. They're all about words, but short on actions.
most of it is probably cheaper to ship than to decommission
JAVELINs and NLAWs have been completely unpredictable, most (confirmed) ATGM kills have been from their domestic STUGNA units
the HAWK system they want to ship is ancient, the NASAMs are more or less just a way for them to get some use out of surplus air to air missiles, HIMARS is more of an advertising campaign for Lockheeb than anything else
I remember when Germany shipped the Gepard guns they'd been out of commission so long that they didn't have any ammo to ship with them, and they couldn't cycle 35mm ammo from other manufacturers -
2022-11-03 at 7:29 PM UTCUkraine 2022: The Rust War
-
2022-11-03 at 7:48 PM UTC
AZOV training looks way gayer than I expected -
2022-11-03 at 7:52 PM UTC
-
2022-11-03 at 7:53 PM UTC
-
2022-11-03 at 7:55 PM UTCI used to buy acid from one of those
-
2022-11-03 at 8:55 PM UTCPutin doesn't personally order everything that happens, it's his goons in the background.
-
2022-11-03 at 9:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny
see below
the president gave the orders to withdraw but did not plan the withdrawal. top military brasses did.
There was no good way to withdraw, military brass drew up bad plans because it was the only option. Biden should not have approved those plans because they were obviously terrible. Which is why he is the only president in US history to be unanimously censured by both parties in the UK. Yes, including Presidents like George Washington and James Madison, who literally waged war against the UK (and in Washington's case, specifically because of colonial animosity towards parliament!) - even that could not unite the brits to formally censure their leadership. Biden is the only one, and it's because he bears FULL RESPONSIBILITY for the withdrawal and how it was handled.
Sorry, Vuthy. I know it's hard to comprehend what a free and open democracy looks like while you're on your back in a Siem Reap brothel getting your shitpussy pounded out by a 63 year old from Switzerland. -
2022-11-03 at 9:08 PM UTCBiden doesn't order anything either. He's nothing more than a puppet on a stick they pop up once in awhile.
-
2022-11-03 at 9:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Biden doesn't order anything either. He's nothing more than a puppet on a stick they pop up once in awhile.
And yet, he is still the man responsible. It almost seems a little unfair, but that's how these things go. The Afghanistan withdrawal is not the result of US military incompetence, beyond the sense in which they undeniably have an incompetent commander-in-chief. -
2022-11-03 at 9:19 PM UTC
-
2022-11-03 at 9:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai And yet, he is still the man responsible. It almost seems a little unfair, but that's how these things go. The Afghanistan withdrawal is not the result of US military incompetence, beyond the sense in which they undeniably have an incompetent commander-in-chief.
There is no commander and chiefs anymore, just a global cabal of bloodthirsty criminals, with their puppets displayed on a pole. -
2022-11-03 at 9:34 PM UTC
-
2022-11-03 at 10:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra he said, increasingly nervously, after it turned out the Russians aren't actually running out of fuel or munitions, and that 'mud' didn't send them home…
meanwhile, in reality
and Arestovich is complaining that they need MORE because their supplies are too low to continue offensive operations (he's probably just trying to squeeze more shekels out, who knows)
Originally posted by Speedy Parker It's funny because it highlights how desperate Putin has become.
-
2022-11-03 at 10:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra most of it is probably cheaper to ship than to decommission
JAVELINs and NLAWs have been completely unpredictable, most (confirmed) ATGM kills have been from their domestic STUGNA units
the HAWK system they want to ship is ancient, the NASAMs are more or less just a way for them to get some use out of surplus air to air missiles, HIMARS is more of an advertising campaign for Lockheeb than anything else
I remember when Germany shipped the Gepard guns they'd been out of commission so long that they didn't have any ammo to ship with them, and they couldn't cycle 35mm ammo from other manufacturers
It's almost as if NATO is half assing 'aid' to achieve it's own geopolitical goals. Also, having former East Bloc countries bankrupt themselves seems myopic. But i am sure some think tank somewhere has war gamed the outcome of this scenario. -
2022-11-03 at 11:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie It's almost as if NATO is half assing 'aid' to achieve it's own geopolitical goals. Also, having former East Bloc countries bankrupt themselves seems myopic. But i am sure some think tank somewhere has war gamed the outcome of this scenario.
A geopolitical alliance working towards it's own goals. How diabolical...
-
2022-11-03 at 11:49 PM UTCNowhere did i mention whether i thought it to be a good or a bad thing.