User Controls
World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast
-
2022-10-29 at 4:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I don't support muzzling, like your nazi/fascist "experts" do.
But actually you do, every lie you post like the one you just posted is a muzzle on truth. Just stop lying, you anti-freedom, anti-free speech fascist."The work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) represents the consensus of the international scientific community on climate change science. We recognise IPCC as the world's most reliable source of information on climate change and its causes, and we endorse its method of achieving this consensus."[57]
-
2022-10-29 at 4:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe But actually you do, every lie you post like the one you just posted is a muzzle on truth. Just stop lying, you anti-freedom, anti-free speech fascist.
You're saying that me saying half of the scientific community has been muzzled is a lie. Well, that just goes to prove beyond all doubt how dishonest, incredulous and brainwashed you really are, because everyone and their dog knows it's true. -
2022-10-29 at 5:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ You're saying that me saying half of the scientific community has been muzzled is a lie. Well, that just goes to prove beyond all doubt how dishonest, incredulous and brainwashed you really are, because everyone and their dog knows it's true.
Actually, everyone and their dog knows that -SpectraL is a known liar and an anti-freedom, anti-free speech fascist."There is almost total consensus among experts that the earth's climate is changing as a result of the build-up of greenhouse gases ... There is broad scientific consensus that coral reefs are heavily affected by the activities of man and there are significant global influences that can make reefs more vulnerable such as global warming ..."[162]
-
2022-10-29 at 5:07 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 5:09 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 5:10 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 5:29 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 5:31 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 6:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker What about the lies you repost?
Almost everything I post includes a link to a source and these sources include references which anyone can check to see if the claim is true or false.Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists say humans are causing climate change.[4][5] Surveys of the scientific literature are another way to measure scientific consensus. A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%,[2] and a 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change.[3] The small percentage of papers that disagreed with the consensus either cannot be replicated or contain errors.[6]
-
2022-10-29 at 6:33 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 6:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists say humans are causing climate change.[4][5] Surveys of the scientific literature are another way to measure scientific consensus. A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%,[2] and a 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change.[3] The small percentage of papers that disagreed with the consensus either cannot be replicated or contain errors.[6]
^
Clear example:
The claim rests on a willingness to assume "nearly all" is in fact nearly all, but no evidence has been produced to demonstrate such. One would have to "believe" such to be true. Kind of like a religion. You're supposed to take wild and unsubstantiated claims and treat it as a fact, which it most certainly is not a fact, it is nothing more that an unsupported and undocumented belief in a third party's claim. When you say, "nearly all", prove it! -
2022-10-29 at 7:34 PM UTCLay down. Jesus Christ.
Vote the opposite u have been -
2022-10-29 at 7:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ^
Clear example:
The claim rests on a willingness to assume "nearly all" is in fact nearly all, but no evidence has been produced to demonstrate such. One would have to "believe" such to be true. Kind of like a religion. You're supposed to take wild and unsubstantiated claims and treat it as a fact, which it most certainly is not a fact, it is nothing more that an unsupported and undocumented belief in a third party's claim. When you say, "nearly all", prove it!
That's what those references are for. -
2022-10-29 at 9:29 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 11:18 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 11:25 PM UTC
-
2022-10-30 at 12:43 AM UTC
-
2022-10-30 at 12:43 AM UTC
-
2022-10-30 at 12:44 AM UTC
-
2022-10-30 at 12:45 AM UTC
