User Controls
World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast
-
2022-10-28 at 7:07 PM UTCThe Creator's plan is much like a refinery. The raw wheat is collected, grinded, sifted, until it is a fine powder. Pure. Uncontaminated. People say, "Why does he allow pain and suffering?!!". It's because that's what we really need, and he knows it, even if we don't. But once the wheat is refined, there is no need for further refining.
-
2022-10-28 at 8:01 PM UTC
-
2022-10-28 at 9:13 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 12:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The Creator's original plan remains unchanged, merely rudely interrupted. God's original plan for man was already revealed, with the Garden of Eden. Man and woman were always intended to inhabit this planet "and become many", and that intention remains. There will be no changes to the original plan, other than the festering cancers removed from it. As for heaven, heaven is the domain of spirit creatures, not man. The only humans who will live their lives in heaven are the 144,000 specially chosen representatives/ambassadors to Man on Earth. They are a special group. The rest of good mankind will live out eternity right here. However, Satan will be released once more, at the conclusion of Jesus' thousand year reign, and many will fall.
The garden of eden was a prison. -
2022-10-29 at 12:23 AM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 3:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ How do you even know what "most" is, when millions of accredited scientists have been banned, harassed, censored, shut down and suppressed, simply because they had an argument someone else didn't like? You can't qualify "most", because you don't have a full sampling in the first place. Like I said, stop lying. It's kind of pathetic, at this point.
"The work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) represents the consensus of the international scientific community on climate change science. We recognise IPCC as the world's most reliable source of information on climate change and its causes, and we endorse its method of achieving this consensus."[57]
-
2022-10-29 at 3:14 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 3:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny
The fallacy, or false analogy, is an argument based on misleading, superficial, or implausible comparisons. It is also known as a faulty analogy, weak analogy, wrongful comparison, metaphor as argument, and analogical fallacy. The term comes from the Latin word fallacia, meaning "deception, deceit, trick, or artifice"
-
2022-10-29 at 3:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe "The work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) represents the consensus of the international scientific community on climate change science. We recognise IPCC as the world's most reliable source of information on climate change and its causes, and we endorse its method of achieving this consensus."[57]
Quote
Stop lying. It's not a "consensus", when half the scientific community has been muzzled by science-less tyrants and their mindless followers. -
2022-10-29 at 3:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ … half the scientific community has been muzzled by science-less tyrants and their mindless followers.
Stop lying."The nature of science is such that there is rarely total agreement among scientists. Individual scientific statements and papers—the validity of some of which has yet to be assessed adequately—can be exploited in the policy debate and can leave the impression that the scientific community is sharply divided on issues where there is, in reality, a strong scientific consensus ... IPCC assessment reports are prepared at approximately five-year intervals by a large international group of experts who represent the broad range of expertise and perspectives relevant to the issues. The reports strive to reflect a consensus evaluation of the results of the full body of peer-reviewed research ... They provide an analysis of what is known and not known, the degree of consensus, and some indication of the degree of confidence that can be placed on the various statements and conclusions."[160]
-
2022-10-29 at 3:35 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 3:40 PM UTC^uses renewable energy sources on his property.
-
2022-10-29 at 3:42 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 3:45 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 4 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 4 PM UTC
-
2022-10-29 at 4:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe "The nature of science is such that there is rarely total agreement among scientists. Individual scientific statements and papers—the validity of some of which has yet to be assessed adequately—can be exploited in the policy debate and can leave the impression that the scientific community is sharply divided on issues where there is, in reality, a strong scientific consensus … IPCC assessment reports are prepared at approximately five-year intervals by a large international group of experts who represent the broad range of expertise and perspectives relevant to the issues. The reports strive to reflect a consensus evaluation of the results of the full body of peer-reviewed research … They provide an analysis of what is known and not known, the degree of consensus, and some indication of the degree of confidence that can be placed on the various statements and conclusions."[160]
Just a long-winded way of denying the reality that half the scientific community has been muzzled by unscientific and paid off goons. -
2022-10-29 at 4:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker It's better than your backup plan scooter.
All attempts at communicating with you always inevitably become cringe-inducing, because there is no real conversation to be had. You have no real points to make, nothing of substance to state, just a glaringly obvious desperate desire to appear "better" than whomever you happen to be talking to. Nobody was talking about renewables, you post a random boomer-tier "news segment" about a cartoon about how unreliable a source of energy renewables are and then when it is pointed out that you are the only person on this entire forum that actually relies on renewables in any capacity whatsoever you immediately deflect and say, "well, they're just my back-up anyways and that's still better than YOUR back-up," like slow down Sally first of all nobody was talking about renewables until you randomly brought them into the conversation and second of all only weak worried wusses have "back-up plans", real men are confident in their ability to improvise and know that when times get tough there will always be something you were not prepared for or did not expect so all you can really expect is the unexpected and the most important thing you can prepare yourself for is death. Know that one day you will die, anything beyond that you are just lying to yourself like a child sucking his thumb pretending it's a nipple. -
2022-10-29 at 4:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Just a long-winded way of denying the reality that half the scientific community has been muzzled by unscientific and paid off goons.
Even if that were true you would still put your neck on the chopping block to defend their right to do it, wouldn't you?"A consensus, based on current evidence, now exists within the global scientific community that human activities are the main source of climate change and that the burning of fossil fuels is largely responsible for driving this change."
-
2022-10-29 at 4:32 PM UTC
