User Controls

If Elon Musk buys Twitter

  1. #41
    Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Twitter is a good medium for journalists because it's interface is simple but capable of dumping quick links and info of larger sizes. The way that social media is so integrated and gay for each other Twitter has the potential to be the first source for all journalists knowing they won't be molested by fi1ters and algorithms with clear favorites.

    Maybe it'll be the same but worse but either way I believe change is ultimately good because the status quo has become synonymous with toxic and pointless internet shit. I like the way it appears Elon Musk thinks compared to whoever is pulling the j00 strings at Twitter rn. People crying about it are just being factional faggots
  2. #42
    Imagine if Lanny was in charge of Twitter. Just imagine.
  3. #43
    Rape Monster Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Imagine if Lanny was in charge of Twitter. Just imagine.

    lanny isnt even in charge of his household
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. #44
    Meikai Heck This Schlong
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? Anonymity is great for forums etc but not for social networks like Twitter.

    The parts of twitter I'm on are basically just forums though. Pretty much everyone is pseudonymous, and it's great. Reminds me a lot of old school (expert subforum) totse, but there's no nazi mods like meta or speckles crying about how much work it is banning people - just insightful people self-organizing and quietly blocking each other until a fairly uniform and inscrutable community emerged from the chaos. Very nice. Anonymity is vital in this context, and I suspect this is a more common use case for social media than you believe. While this is undeniably a niche, there are definitely similarly niche corners of twitter that are all functioning as the modern equivalent to ye olde forums.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. #45
    Lodger Free African Astronaut
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Imagine if Lanny was in charge of Twitter. Just imagine.

    He'd go Lefty like a bitch.

    they all sell out at some point! now I'm mad just thinking about this.

    FUCK YOU LANNY
  6. #46
    Lodger Free African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Meikai The parts of twitter I'm on are basically just forums though. Pretty much everyone is pseudonymous, and it's great. Reminds me a lot of old school (expert subforum) totse, but there's no nazi mods like meta or speckles crying about how much work it is banning people - just insightful people self-organizing and quietly blocking each other until a fairly uniform and inscrutable community emerged from the chaos. Very nice. Anonymity is vital in this context, and I suspect this is a more common use case for social media than you believe. While this is undeniably a niche, there are definitely similarly niche corners of twitter that are all functioning as the modern equivalent to ye olde forums.

    STFU. You and your little scrawny Whore get back in the kitchen and make us up some grub!
  7. #47
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition


    lul
  8. #48
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Sudo Twitter is a good medium for journalists because it's interface is simple but capable of dumping quick links and info of larger sizes. The way that social media is so integrated and gay for each other Twitter has the potential to be the first source for all journalists knowing they won't be molested by fi1ters and algorithms with clear favorites.

    Maybe it'll be the same but worse but either way I believe change is ultimately good because the status quo has become synonymous with toxic and pointless internet shit. I like the way it appears Elon Musk thinks compared to whoever is pulling the j00 strings at Twitter rn. People crying about it are just being factional faggots

    What about Taylor Lorenz and her current twitter jama? And the harassment of women?


  9. #49
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood What about Taylor Lorenz and her current twitter jama? And the harassment of women?

    What a cunt though, doxxing others then whinging about getting doxxed herself.
  10. #50
    Originally posted by frala Sure it has, it’s just liberal and not conservative.

    No it hasn't, it's nowhere near close to as big as FB and FB is literally proven to explicitly create echo chambers, specially right wing ones. You're stupid.
  11. #51
    Originally posted by Meikai The parts of twitter I'm on are basically just forums though. Pretty much everyone is pseudonymous, and it's great. Reminds me a lot of old school (expert subforum) totse, but there's no nazi mods like meta or speckles crying about how much work it is banning people - just insightful people self-organizing and quietly blocking each other until a fairly uniform and inscrutable community emerged from the chaos. Very nice. Anonymity is vital in this context, and I suspect this is a more common use case for social media than you believe. While this is undeniably a niche, there are definitely similarly niche corners of twitter that are all functioning as the modern equivalent to ye olde forums.

    Doesn't matter: 240char Twitter moron isn't a forum, it's a social network for microblogging and makes much more sense to limit it to real identities.
  12. #52
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? No it hasn't, it's nowhere near close to as big as FB and FB is literally proven to explicitly create echo chambers, specially right wing ones. You're stupid.

    That's a feature - you contain them so they don't get exposed to any hot takes or genuinely spicy stuff, just stupid cuckservative talking points.
  13. #53
    Meikai Heck This Schlong
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? Doesn't matter: 240char Twitter moron isn't a forum, it's a social network for microblogging and makes much more sense to limit it to real identities.

    Ahh right, once you go from regular blogging - where anonymity is fine - to microblogging, the real IDs have to come out. This is known.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. #54
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? No it hasn't, it's nowhere near close to as big as FB and FB is literally proven to explicitly create echo chambers, specially right wing ones. You're stupid.

    Yes I said FB is conservative in that quote you quoted me in. Thank you for agreeing with me. However I don’t care about the relative sizes of their user base, as both have created the same the same thing.
  15. #55
    Leftists never get banned on Facebook, only people with right wing opinions. It's an echo chamber for liberals.
  16. #56
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    you can get away with banning right wingers on any website because they worst they will do is call you a nigger loving kike and go to stormfront
  17. #57
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Who are you, John Joke (inventor of jokes)? Hey, you want your new girlfriend to get raped or something?

    ♠︎Man fucker alert
  18. #58
    Originally posted by Donald Trump That's a feature - you contain them so they don't get exposed to any hot takes or genuinely spicy stuff, just stupid cuckservative talking points.

    Stfu idiot
  19. #59
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker ♠︎Man fucker alert

    Nothing more manfucky than raping a woman
  20. #60
    Originally posted by aldra

    lul

    why ''americans'' keep handling the control of their country to dalits ?

    the civilization that adopted freeddom of speeches as their first thing in their bill of rights having the people who shit in the streets as their ''leaders''.
Jump to Top