User Controls

Military Genius Zelensky wants Ukrainians to throw molotovs at Russian tanks

  1. Originally posted by aldra a lot of interesting things coming out of Mariupol now that the guys holed up there fully understand there's no way out - first a large group took a bunch of private cars (50 or so) and painted Zs on them to try and break out but were intercepted, then the holdouts in Azovstahl started surrendering en masse.

    A bunch of foreign mercs including some that fought with the YPG in Syria are now in Russian custody, as well as an entire squad of Afghan special forces - when the Taliban took over and kicked out the Ghani government, the US just started using the upper-echelon troops they trained as a PMC.

    i cant wait for their bio weapons lab to be exposed.

    would MATO bomb the shit out of it before the russians salvage informations from it ?

    i hope not.
  2. Originally posted by Donald Trump

    Things never change in Ukraine, even in a war they politicians take their cut :D

    its the same thing the world over,

    have you never ask yourself why are dangerous and untested chemical dubbed as ''vaxxine'' are mandatory for all in 55 countries around the world.

    are you 12.
  3. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny its the same thing the world over,

    have you never ask yourself why are dangerous and untested chemical dubbed as ''vaxxine'' are mandatory for all in 55 countries around the world.

    are you 12.

    No because they are not dangerous or untested.
  4. Originally posted by Number13 What's the source on that one? we know if it's a uk tank?

    I'm pretty sure it's a Ukrainian tank.
    Reasons:
    1: You can't make out much, but there mustn't be a letter on the front of the tank or the infantry guys would have seen it. Human vision is far better than smartphone video still.
    2:
    3:
    Looks like the Ukrainians are tidying it up now.

    The V wreck was obviously a few days old. I'm guessing the Russians withdrew (the Russians are keeping the war extremely mobile) the Ukies who got blasted came down the road ahead of the tanks. Then stopped their vehicles in behind the mounds of earth, took some photos and selfies with the kill and the dead bodies which they had nothing to do with. The mounds of earth hid their vehicles. The guys were standing around when the tanks caught up, and they weren't afraid cos they knew the tanks and maybe even knew the tank crews. But the tank gunner seen the APC with the V surrounded by guys in camo, aimed at it, panicked and blasted it.

    Real ignorance, but everyone who goes into the army says they never realised how dumb the average person was until they joined.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Originally posted by Donald Trump I'm pretty sure it's a Ukrainian tank.
    Reasons:
    1: You can't make out much, but there mustn't be a letter on the front of the tank or the infantry guys would have seen it. Human vision is far better than smartphone video still.
    2:
    3:
    Looks like the Ukrainians are tidying it up now.

    The V wreck was obviously a few days old. I'm guessing the Russians withdrew (the Russians are keeping the war extremely mobile) the Ukies who got blasted came down the road ahead of the tanks. Then stopped their vehicles in behind the mounds of earth, took some photos and selfies with the kill and the dead bodies which they had nothing to do with. The mounds of earth hid their vehicles. The guys were standing around when the tanks caught up, and they weren't afraid cos they knew the tanks and maybe even knew the tank crews. But the tank gunner seen the APC with the V surrounded by guys in camo, aimed at it, panicked and blasted it.

    Real ignorance, but everyone who goes into the army says they never realised how dumb the average person was until they joined.

    idk mane. i read somewhere that the ukrainians are now painting their vehicles with russian markings to avoid getting bombed by the russians.

    its hard to tell without knowing what the bunch and the camera man were saying.
  6. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No because they are not dangerous or untested.



    then why were they dispensed under emergency uses.
  7. The SBU (secret police, like the FBI or KGB/FSB) took Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian oligarch, hostage and want to exchange him to Russia for Ukrainian POWs (who will no doubt be thrown back into the meat grinder). Of course Medvedchuk is a goy, jedi oligarchs don't get treated like that.

    He has pro-Russian sympathies, yet it's a strange precedent to set, kidnapping one of your own citizens and trying to trade him with the enemy.
  8. also we need a transcript of what this guy was rapping about.

  9. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny also we need a transcript of what this guy was rapping about.


    Someone overlaid that talking. It's not in the original video.

  10. Originally posted by Donald Trump Someone overlaid that talking. It's not in the original video.


    idk, i thought they erased the narration. the audio seemes to match the video with the narrator panting and trying to catch his breath.
  11. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    then why were they dispensed under emergency uses.

    Same reason an epipen is usually dispensed under emergency uses...not really relevant to whether it's dangerous or untested
  12. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Same reason an epipen is usually dispensed under emergency uses…not really relevant to whether it's dangerous or untested



    thinks emergency use authorization is the same as emergency use of insulin shots.

    so unliterated.
  13. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny idk, i thought they erased the narration. the audio seemes to match the video with the narrator panting and trying to catch his breath.

    The overlaid audio is talking about the Russians, so whoever did it is eager to blame the attack on the Russians as opposed to admitting it's friendly fire.

    Just more NATO/western misinfo. People won't go to fight with the Ukrainians when they realise they're as likely to get killed by a retarded hohol as by a Russian.
  14. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    thinks emergency use authorization is the same as emergency use of insulin shots.

    so unliterated.



    You didn't say emergency use authorization...you said "Emergency uses"

    But yeah, where does emergency use authorization imply it's untested and dangerous???...it doesn't

  15. Originally posted by Donald Trump The overlaid audio is talking about the Russians, so whoever did it is eager to blame the attack on the Russians as opposed to admitting it's friendly fire.

    Just more NATO/western misinfo. People won't go to fight with the Ukrainians when they realise they're as likely to get killed by a retarded hohol as by a Russian.

    whats the point ? it doesnt have any propaganda value.
  16. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson

    You didn't say emergency use authorization…you said "Emergency uses"

    But yeah, where does emergency use authorization imply it's untested and dangerous???…it doesn't




    if it was tested and proven like any other vaxxes and drugs then it would be approved for use withoit the need for emergency use authorizations, or premature authorizations of anykind.
  17. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny whats the point ? it doesnt have any propaganda value.

    Listening to it again the guy is complaining about how those "russian bitches" have fucked them.

    It was dubbed over by some Russian who wanted to claim the incident for the motherland.
  18. Originally posted by Donald Trump Listening to it again the guy is complaining about how those "russian bitches" have fucked them.

    It was dubbed over by some Russian who wanted to claim the incident for the motherland.

    but then why fire two shots.
  19. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny but then why fire two shots.

    Why not? Russian tanks have autoloaders.
  20. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    if it was tested and proven like any other vaxxes and drugs then it would be approved for use withoit the need for emergency use authorizations, or premature authorizations of anykind.

    Lol, who told you that?

    It's been tested, fact, it was "fast tracked" because it was new and needed now not in 10yrs.

    It's simple enough to understand...fast tracking something doesn't mean it's danerous or untested...I could spend 8hrs at work and drag completing a report out for those whole 8hrs...or I could "fast track" it and have in done in 30 mins...either way the resulting report is the same
Jump to Top