User Controls
Systemic racism in the Biden administration
-
2022-02-25 at 6:29 PM UTC
-
2022-02-25 at 6:34 PM UTC
-
2022-02-25 at 6:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson My version is evaluating all candidates based on their qualifications/experience/history…
..Not on the fact they get ashy elbows in the winter and eat a lot of fried chicken.
So what’s the difference between getting a gigg because your skin gets ashy in the winter and getting a gigg because your skin peals in the summer ?
I won’t even address the chicken claim .. because the white people love fried chicken more than anyone ... -
2022-02-25 at 6:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by CandyRein So what’s the difference between getting a gigg because your skin gets ashy in the winter and getting a gigg because your skin peals in the summ ?
There is no difference.
Choosing anyone for a top level position simply because of their skin color/gender rather than evaluate all candidates based on the their qualifications/experience/history is clearly wrong. Stating you are going to pick a black female for the position before ANYONE has even been evaluated as a candidate is racist and sexist...and obviously wrong. -
2022-02-25 at 6:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 Another TL/DR person who refused to read her qualifications.
I'm sure she's very qualified and might in fact be the very best person to fill the position, in fact.
But why would you ask this question?
Originally posted by stl1 Were Barrett and Cavanaugh the most qualified for the Supreme Court or were they selected for thgir right leaning politics and the hope that they would overturn Roe v. Wade?
-
2022-02-25 at 6:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson There is no difference.
Choosing anyone for a top level position simply because of their skin color/gender rather than evaluate all candidates based on the their qualifications/experience/history is clearly wrong. Stating you are going to pick a black female for the position before ANYONE has even been evaluated as a candidate is racist and sexist…and obviously wrong.
White people have been sitting in power because they are white since a long time... news flash
Get over it -
2022-02-25 at 6:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 Another TL/DR person who refused to read her qualifications.
Again her qualifications are irrelevant unless you can post EVERY POSSIBLE CANDIDATES qualifications to compare them to...but you can't...because Biden stated UPFRONT he was going to pick a black woman before he'd seen and evaluated ANY qualifications.
That's the racist (and sexist) bit you see...a white middle aged man didn't have a chance, an Indian woman didn't have a chance, an Asian Transexual didn't have a chance... -
2022-02-25 at 6:47 PM UTC
Cry me ..
Cry me...🎵😜
Ot
Yahh! Congratulations to that sistah!! -
2022-02-25 at 6:51 PM UTC
-
2022-02-25 at 6:52 PM UTCThe true facts of the matter are that, oftentimes, black women have to be much more qualified and competent than their white, male competition to even be considered for the same position.
-
2022-02-25 at 6:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 The true facts of the matter are that, oftentimes, black women have to be much more qualified and competent than their white, male competition to even be considered for the same position.
Like the vice president?
The main qualifications for this nomination was being a woman and black...per your president's statement. -
2022-02-25 at 7:22 PM UTCTo be fair though, if she really is the most qualified, regardless of if she did indeed get picked firstly because of her sex and race, it's sort of a no harm no foul really.
Like as a general practice obviously not the best way to decide roles like this but since it happened, and it worked out, let's not automatically disqualify her JUST BECAUSE Biden said that. Give credit where credit is due at least as far as she's concerned.
I certainly don't know enough about supreme court candidates qualifications to be able to say one way or the other (and I kinda don't really give a shit either) but I definitely can't read her list of qualifications and think myself 'oh that's it? I can think of waayyy more qualified people. Is this a JOKE??🤣'
Because I cant name another person more qualified. In fact I couldn't name another person at all. oopsy faisy! -
2022-02-25 at 8:34 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2022-02-25 at 8:45 PM UTC
-
2022-02-25 at 8:51 PM UTClol.
supreme court judges were never chosen based on their qualifications, but are instead chosen based in their political leanings and affiliation.
its just that biden adds another few metric to the selection process that includes sex and color.
the century of niggers is upon thee. deal with it. -
2022-02-25 at 8:51 PM UTCYour gradmpa evolv wit my diq in hes mouthThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2022-02-25 at 8:52 PM UTCPlenty of blacks in power in Africa...that's worked out real well hasn't it
-
2022-02-25 at 8:52 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2022-02-25 at 8:58 PM UTC
-
2022-02-25 at 8:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ I'm just curious is all.. Like it sounded above, that you were implying that this judge in question is a "monkey" and wouldn't be good in an administrative position.
What are the exceptions for you? Are all black people "monkeys" by default until they demonstrate to you otherwise? Do you have a list of criteria that you use to determine when a black person goes from monkey to regular human?
I think maybe as the superior race who evolved from niggers we display more civility. Blacks are on the cusp of evolving into civilized therefore they still retain some of their niggerish animal instincts.
