Originally posted by Speedy Parker
If you know the first group is lying when they say the answer is true it is pretty easy to believe another group when they say the answer is false.
Or both groups are lying and exaggerating "truths" in order to try and discredit the other. I'm just posing the question is all. At the end of the day we have to trust these people and take them at their word.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by mmQ
Or both groups are lying and exaggerating "truths" in order to try and discredit the other. I'm just posing the question is all. At the end of the day we have to trust these people and take them at their word.
If something is either true or false one side is telling the truth and the other is lying. If you know which side is lying the truth becomes apparent.
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
If something is either true or false one side is telling the truth and the other is lying. If you know which side is lying the truth becomes apparent.
"I know the truth and it doesn't matter what you think or say because I know the truth."
If group A is untrustworthy, and group B points that out, that just doesn't automatically mean that anything group B has to say is therefore trustworthy. Wait til group C shows up and just blows everyone's minds.
Originally posted by mmQ
This is a good example of someone, instead of saying what they mean for themselves, they misquote someone else and attribute it to them.
I thought you were above such tactics.
is this not the very thing you are so vehemently opposed to?
"Lighten up kid it was just a joke"
😬
The unwritten rule book says you can use it twice a month without being frowned upon. I used them both at once. Sue me.
