User Controls
China hate thead (aka: Thanks China for fucking up the world)
-
2021-07-15 at 5:31 PM UTCLooks like we got ourselves a....CONVOY.
-
2021-07-15 at 5:32 PM UTC
-
2021-07-15 at 5:36 PM UTC
-
2021-07-15 at 5:44 PM UTC
-
2021-07-15 at 5:47 PM UTC
-
2021-07-15 at 5:49 PM UTCLol @ people who think freedom exists.
-
2021-07-15 at 5:51 PM UTCThe only way freedom actually exists is if people take it by force.
-
2021-07-15 at 6:50 PM UTCTrue freedom is anarchy...and not having to stick to 20mph in a school zone.
I'll do what I want, when I want and for as long as I want...as the lovely DTE likes to whisper in my ear at bedtime. -
2021-07-15 at 9:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ You should get banned for nothing, so you can see how it feels to be "treated fairly".
If someone doesn't want you on their property then I say "fair enough".
You shouldn't feel so entitled to other people's things: it's their right, as their property, to deny you access to it if you cannot play by their rules.
Just the same way as you can deny a rude or rowdy person entry to your home or your workplace, or ask them to leave it.
And guess what? In none of those cases are you violating their constitutional right to their freedom of speech. -
2021-07-15 at 9:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson True freedom is anarchy…and not having to stick to 20mph in a school zone.
That's not true at all. All freedoms can't be expressed mutually and simultaneously.
In a state of anarchy, your freedom to live might overlap with my freedom to shoot whoever I deem necessary. But the same goes for me, and I don't want to live in a world where everybody thinks it's ok to kill me.
Even if you could kill any one person who tried to kill you, maybe two people mutually don't want to kill each other very much so they decide to put agree not to kill each other and hunt down the murderer shooting people on a whim.
Maybe a whole bunch of them do that, because they find it more convenient to live in a lawful society where they decide between themselves how not to infringe on each other's basic freedoms and then exercise all the rest of their freedoms as freely as they want.
Such as banning people from their privately owned platforms.I'll do what I want, when I want and for as long as I want…as the lovely DTE likes to whisper in my ear at bedtime.
No you won't. You're just another member of the state of society. -
2021-07-15 at 11:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Mike David from Redbar Radio If someone doesn't want you on their property then I say "fair enough".
You shouldn't feel so entitled to other people's things: it's their right, as their property, to deny you access to it if you cannot play by their rules.
Just the same way as you can deny a rude or rowdy person entry to your home or your workplace, or ask them to leave it.
And guess what? In none of those cases are you violating their constitutional right to their freedom of speech.
Sooo.. if you were banned right now, you'd be fine with it. -
2021-07-15 at 11:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Mike David from Redbar Radio That's not true at all. All freedoms can't be expressed mutually and simultaneously.
In a state of anarchy, your freedom to live might overlap with my freedom to shoot whoever I deem necessary. But the same goes for me, and I don't want to live in a world where everybody thinks it's ok to kill me.
Even if you could kill any one person who tried to kill you, maybe two people mutually don't want to kill each other very much so they decide to put agree not to kill each other and hunt down the murderer shooting people on a whim.
Maybe a whole bunch of them do that, because they find it more convenient to live in a lawful society where they decide between themselves how not to infringe on each other's basic freedoms and then exercise all the rest of their freedoms as freely as they want.
Such as banning people from their privately owned platforms.
No you won't. You're just another member of the state of society.
Like I said, lol @ people who think freedom exists. -
2021-07-15 at 11:43 PM UTCFreedom isn't something you are given, it's something you take.
-
2021-07-16 at 12:18 AM UTC
-
2021-07-16 at 12:56 AM UTC
-
2021-07-16 at 12:58 AM UTC
Originally posted by Mike David from Redbar Radio I might not agree with it but what I agree with wouldn't matter: their property, their rules. It wouldn't be a violation of my constitutional rights, that's for sure.
But why are u promoting that faggot in ur avatar? Does he pay u to advertise for him? -
2021-07-16 at 1:33 AM UTC
-
2021-07-16 at 2:44 AM UTC
-
2021-07-16 at 3:23 AM UTC
-
2021-07-16 at 3:33 AM UTCWhat's going on here? Are we mad at CCP or no?
