User Controls
Poll: ?
- His father
- His uncle Richie
- Homeless man beneath the bridge
- John Cena
- Fat Albert
-
Santa, but a mall Santa
- A golden retriever
Who molested netstat as a child?
-
2021-03-17 at 7:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Ok smartass, my posting history is searchable, link to the post where i said what you say i said.
https://niggasin.space/thread/60615?p=1#post-1235048 -
2021-03-17 at 7:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev hmm, i did reach puberty at an earlier age. i remember all my classmates in middle school being so goddamn infantile by my standard. i was never diddled tho.
but in theory, someones AOA should increase as they age, but for pedos this doesnt happen, their first AOA becomes permanent. why is this?
have you seen his photo? hiki could beat the shit out of this fruitcake. just think about that for a minute.
Age of attraction when it comes to guys liking girls levels off rather quickly. There's been studies that show most men find 14-17 year olds sexually attractive. this goes for men of all ages. Every straight male who says they have never seen an attractive 15yo is lying. This makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
I think those of us who like pre-pubeescent girls and are not sadists have a strong genetic component, and certain positive experiences and associations with young girls. Young girls 11 or younger, represent the purest form of innocence, good nature, and playful femininity, traits that we find especially attractive, which are of course more present in say an 8yo as opposed to a 16 year old. A sweet 8 year old is very easy to love, and since they represent the things i mentioned and since we value love to a high degree when it comes to an intimate or romantic partner, pre-pubeescent girls are the ultimate expression of what we find appealing. -
2021-03-17 at 7:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://niggasin.space/thread/60615?p=1#post-1235048
Thank you for exposing your lies. -
2021-03-17 at 8:57 PM UTC
-
2021-03-17 at 8:59 PM UTCsomeone's mom?
-
2021-03-17 at 10:31 PM UTCi continue to molest him as a child & he doesn't even know
-
2021-03-17 at 10:40 PM UTC
-
2021-03-18 at 12 AM UTC
-
2021-03-18 at 2:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Age of attraction when it comes to guys liking girls levels off rather quickly. There's been studies that show most men find 14-17 year olds sexually attractive. this goes for men of all ages. Every straight male who says they have never seen an attractive 15yo is lying. This makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
I think those of us who like pre-pubeescent girls and are not sadists have a strong genetic component, and certain positive experiences and associations with young girls. Young girls 11 or younger, represent the purest form of innocence, good nature, and playful femininity, traits that we find especially attractive, which are of course more present in say an 8yo as opposed to a 16 year old. A sweet 8 year old is very easy to love, and since they represent the things i mentioned and since we value love to a high degree when it comes to an intimate or romantic partner, pre-pubeescent girls are the ultimate expression of what we find appealing.
i realize the current definition of pedophilia is retarded if it includes the postpubescent, i do not refer to them.
kids are easy to love, yes, but that doesnt explain the root of the sexual attraction. small animals are easy to love too but they dont give me a hardon. -
2021-03-18 at 4:10 PM UTCedited for privacyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-03-18 at 4:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev i realize the current definition of pedophilia is retarded if it includes the postpubescent, i do not refer to them.
kids are easy to love, yes, but that doesnt explain the root of the sexual attraction. small animals are easy to love too but they dont give me a hardon.
so are large animals, child rapist. -
2021-03-18 at 4:16 PM UTCITT: we try to rationalize, explain and excuse pedophilia
-
2021-03-18 at 4:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by WellHung so are large animals, child rapist.
maybe but i havent seen anything cuter than a house cat. big ones like jaguars and pumas are cute but still not as cute and cuddly as a domesticated pet.
and no need to project your rape fantasies onto me, fatboy. arent you due for your next interval to register as a sex offender? -
2021-03-18 at 4:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by netstat i read somewhere that the genetic origin of pedophilia has to do with a cross wiring between the part of the brain that motivates people to nurture children and the part that generates sexual impulses
don't know if there's any research behind this, too bad oplus is not around anymore, he seemed to have studied this topic at a high academic level and knew a lot
Joepedo on totse said something about an evolutionary mechanism back in the old days when tribal societies needed someone to rear other peoples children fulltime. we know men will simp hard to sacrifice everything to protect their wives holy uterus when they are under that love spell. its the same thing with the pedo regarding his lolis. a very useful way to get an adult completely invested into offspring that arent his.
after the industrial revolution when infant mortality declined and childrens safety not nearly the pressing issue it once was, they basically became irrelevant.
there is neurology research on what you brought up, you can look up the presentation at toronto university streamed online. the neurologist did brain scans and said the pedos brain showed activity in areas that show nurturing and lust, or just lust while the brains of nonpedos only lit up the nurturing part. but this didnt really do anything other than prove the obvious. -
2021-03-18 at 5:09 PM UTCDamn you're so retarded lol
-
2021-03-18 at 9:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by netstat i read somewhere that the genetic origin of pedophilia has to do with a cross wiring between the part of the brain that motivates people to nurture children and the part that generates sexual impulses
don't know if there's any research behind this, too bad oplus is not around anymore, he seemed to have studied this topic at a high academic level and knew a lot
I remember yeah, didn't he do research into hebephilia specifically? -
2021-03-18 at 9:45 PM UTCHebephilia is grass-eating pedos.
-
2021-03-22 at 2:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev Joepedo on totse said something about an evolutionary mechanism back in the old days when tribal societies needed someone to rear other peoples children fulltime. we know men will simp hard to sacrifice everything to protect their wives holy uterus when they are under that love spell. its the same thing with the pedo regarding his lolis. a very useful way to get an adult completely invested into offspring that arent his.
after the industrial revolution when infant mortality declined and childrens safety not nearly the pressing issue it once was, they basically became irrelevant.
there is neurology research on what you brought up, you can look up the presentation at toronto university streamed online. the neurologist did brain scans and said the pedos brain showed activity in areas that show nurturing and lust, or just lust while the brains of nonpedos only lit up the nurturing part. but this didnt really do anything other than prove the obvious.
who do you think would waste their time, money and effort to set up orphanages and CPS ?
ja. -
2021-03-22 at 2:29 PM UTC
-
2021-03-22 at 2:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny who do you think would waste their time, money and effort to set up orphanages and CPS ?
ja.
an overpopulation of otherwise useless mostly non-pedo adults that need a job?
in the old days, dad was too busy hunting, mom too busy cooking, grandparents didnt exist because no one lived past 30 and aunts and uncles had their own families to take care of. pedos were the most efficient solution for the betterment of the tribe by maximizing the use of adults with no sexual interest in fertile women.
