User Controls
Why i'm smarter and more intelligent than everyone on this forum
-
2021-03-01 at 11:01 PM UTCWhos chicken now lololol
-
2021-03-01 at 11:01 PM UTCHuehiehue
-
2021-03-01 at 11:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost As an intelligent person you shouldn't need to be explained the scientific definition of what the majority of people commonly refer to as chickens. I say this as a person with years of experience in the chicken industry and I know my difference between a layer and a broiler.
A chicken is a chicken. Once again you prove that people with a primary sexual attraction to children are not intelligent beings.
meh, as an intelligent person you shouldve known that chickens evolved from t-rexes and that evolution is an analog and gradual process. t-rexes just dont turn into cocks overnight but morphed into it slowly over the aeons.
so at what point do we consider those t-rexes chicken enough to be called chickens is subject to different opinions.
its also generally accepted that dinosaurs reproduce by laying eggs, which inevitably brings us to the question of which comes first, eggs or dinosaurs. -
2021-03-02 at 12:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny meh, as an intelligent person you shouldve known that chickens evolved from t-rexes and that evolution is an analog and gradual process. t-rexes just dont turn into cocks overnight but morphed into it slowly over the aeons.
so at what point do we consider those t-rexes chicken enough to be called chickens is subject to different opinions.
its also generally accepted that dinosaurs reproduce by laying eggs, which inevitably brings us to the question of which comes first, eggs or dinosaurs.
you're getting lost in the semantics. Think about it like this, when a species is identified are they identifying that species based on the egg or based on what comes out of it?
Nobody knew what a chicken was until the egg already hatched. It doesn't matter what the subject inside the egg is or it's origins. -
2021-03-02 at 12:33 AM UTCWhat if I
-
2021-03-02 at 12:40 AM UTC
-
2021-03-02 at 1:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost I have no such complexes as I have taken a gram of pure mescaline and frequently slice myself up with sharp knives to remind myself that I am nothing but a bag of meat.
Anyone can be as wise and learned as me if they wanted to, i'm not special. As a highly intelligent person I understand that I didn't come up with much of anything on my own. I owe all of my understanding to the history and knowledge of all mankind.
The reason why i'm highly intelligent is because I am smart enough to know that there is always something I won't understand and I have an endless thirst for more knowledge.
Yeah but not really though.
First, you falsely assume that you're smarter than everyone here. You can't know this because you don't know us.
Then you somehow link god complex to mescaline, and after that you also link mescaline to cutting. I'm afraid that those statements does not a highly intelligent individual make.
You're not entirely retarded though, i'll grant you that. Because there are words of truth in some of what you speak and i would like to hear more, as long as it does not boost your own ego in the process. -
2021-03-02 at 1:26 AM UTCOne could have a wealth of experience, yet learn nothing from it.
-
2021-03-02 at 1:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ One could have a wealth of experience, yet learn nothing from it.
I don't think that's very likely. Experiencing something is the simplest form of learning. First time you get punched, that experience naturally teaches you that getting punched hurts. Then when you experience the pain, you learn what it's like to experience pain. It's unpleasant so in the future you'll try to avoid that sensation. That's learning on a base level. -
2021-03-02 at 1:51 AM UTCOpen your mind folks!
-
2021-03-02 at 1:52 AM UTCMany people set out to intentionally learn nothing, because ignorance really is bliss. They are only interested in the experiences themselves. The creature comforts, if you will. Higher learning means nothing to them.
-
2021-03-02 at 3:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost you're getting lost in the semantics. Think about it like this, when a species is identified are they identifying that species based on the egg or based on what comes out of it?
non sequitor. identifying whether they identify the species based on their traits or eggs have no bearing on what comes first, egg or chicken.Nobody knew what a chicken was until the egg already hatched. It doesn't matter what the subject inside the egg is or it's origins.
no, we arent talking about egg machines where you put pennies into it and crank an egg out of it.
most people know what a chicken egg is thats how they manage to buy chicken eggs at the store without ending up with quail eggs instead. -
2021-03-02 at 3:07 PM UTCif you've never seen a quail or chicken egg and someone showed you them next to each other you would be guessing which belonged to the chicken without already knowing that chickens are larger animals.
The only reason you know it's a chicken egg is because you know what a chicken is. If you had never seen a chicken before the egg would just be a mysterious egg until it hatched.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-03-02 at 3:08 PM UTCFutureman would know the answer.
-
2021-03-02 at 3:09 PM UTCOP is just dumb white trash with no self-awareness and thinks he's god because he binged on meth and had a psychotic break
-
2021-03-02 at 3:09 PM UTC
-
2021-03-02 at 3:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost if you've never seen a quail or chicken egg and someone showed you them next to each other you would be guessing which belonged to the chicken without already knowing that chickens are larger animals.
The only reason you know it's a chicken egg is because you know what a chicken is. If you had never seen a chicken before the egg would just be a mysterious egg until it hatched.
just because you dont know an egg is a chicken egg doesnt make that egg a non-chicken egg.
your knowledge or the lack of it about a something doesnt change what it is. -
2021-03-02 at 3:21 PM UTC
-
2021-03-02 at 3:52 PM UTC
-
2021-03-02 at 3:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost if you've never seen a quail or chicken egg and someone showed you them next to each other you would be guessing which belonged to the chicken without already knowing that chickens are larger animals.
The only reason you know it's a chicken egg is because you know what a chicken is. If you had never seen a chicken before the egg would just be a mysterious egg until it hatched.
Mystery Egg
