his speach was taken out with all the yellow floweres where he agreed to be apart of america
this is the country we live in. Guys like bill the cat will deny this and say it never happened but will rather talk abut haveing sex with men at his own expense. He was basically erased from most of america memborie but it wasn't from mine.
what exactly is the point you're trying to make? I can't watch all that right now.
Saddam was a bit of a mixed bag, he got played by the US A few times and didn't exactly have clean hands, but he held Iraq together and was a big part of ensuring regional stability which all went to shit when he was deposed
Originally posted by aldra
what exactly is the point you're trying to make? I can't watch all that right now.
Saddam was a bit of a mixed bag, he got played by the US A few times and didn't exactly have clean hands, but he held Iraq together and was a big part of ensuring regional stability which all went to shit when he was deposed
Exactly as planned.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by HampTheToker
Bill Krozby will believe anything if it's in YouTube format.
I fucking hate people who post youtube videos and then can't provide a summary; I can't watch videos/pay pay enough attention to follow it most of the time, and even if I could I find it much easier to properly analyse an argument if it's in written. it saves you having to keep pausing the video whenever they bring up something contentious to verify it
in fact I think that's one of the reasons why videos are so popular for publishing nutty nonsense. aside from the lower mental expenditure of watching a video vs. reading, the information is meant to be consumed in a single uninterrupted sitting - it delivers all of it's information at once, discouraging the viewer from verifying independent aspects of it. because the information on the whole sounds feasible, the viewer ignores conflicts in the supporting facts that the entire thing is based on
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by aldra
I fucking hate people who post youtube videos and then can't provide a summary; I can't watch videos/pay pay enough attention to follow it most of the time, and even if I could I find it much easier to properly analyse an argument if it's in written. it saves you having to keep pausing the video whenever they bring up something contentious to verify it
in fact I think that's one of the reasons why videos are so popular for publishing nutty nonsense. aside from the lower mental expenditure of watching a video vs. reading, the information is meant to be consumed in a single uninterrupted sitting - it delivers all of it's information at once, discouraging the viewer from verifying independent aspects of it. because the information on the whole sounds feasible, the viewer ignores conflicts in the supporting facts that the entire thing is based on
So this is why I always prefer to read rather than watch
