User Controls
Its safe to say lanny has given up
-
2021-01-23 at 1:37 PM UTC
-
2021-01-23 at 2:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by livingelegy He has a point man. Private enterprise has the right to refuse service. In the information age it can be easy to forget that the internet is just a collection of digital services provided by private companies.
you forget a single enterprise monopolizes 99% of those services, im glad you wanna be a cuck for the right of a hegemon to silence and oppress and imply that takes precedence over the right of the majority to exercise their freedom of speech.
the right to silence, all fine and dandy.
the right to free expression, thats a privilege? just fucking priceless.
why are you on here? fuck off to fecesbook, bootlicking faggot. go shill for their authoritarian rights there. maybe theyll give you a promotion. -
2021-01-23 at 2:10 PM UTCbanning/blocking should only be done when the majority is sickened by nasty newds being spammed on the forums.
free speech should be allowed no matter the context. -
2021-01-23 at 2:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by The Head Nigger In Charge No they don't. You can't force anyone to do anything. At most you can give them a refund on the remaining service length and say "see ya".
So? If you have a restaurant and Muslim terrorists start congregating there, you would be perfectly within your right to refuse them service on a case by case basis.
You could even do it simply for not liking their face. The only things you can't discriminate about is stuff you have no control over, like your race, sex, age etc.
This is the same thing as the gay cake thing, why do you faggots feel entitled to making other people do shit for you when they don't want to?
Who gives a fuck? I don't know what the fuck you want, for hosts to not enforce TOS or not have any TOS? The reasons hosts have TOSes is because they don't want to die on the hill of some random faggot's desire to be a Nazi, or say nigger, or anything else.
You haven't even considered the flip side, of what happens when MAKING PRIVATE PARTIES DO SHIT THEY DON'T WANT gets turned against us.
Yeah you stupid piece of shit, private businesses aren't there to die for your ideals, they are there to make money.
It's no different than if you open up a wedding venue and ISIS tried to hire it, you would be perfectly within your right to say "nah fuck off you cunts", even if that is solely because letting them use your service is bad PR… Why should they have to take on the bad PR and damage their business for the shitty stuff you want to do with your freedom of speech?
I care about actual freedom. Not bullshit lipservice freedom where retards can't follow the rules of private services, get banned and then cry about freeze peach cenzorzhip when nobody wants to be associated with them being retarded any more.
*scrolls over*
-
2021-01-23 at 3:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev you forget a single enterprise monopolizes 99% of those services
1. Not even true.
2. People used the free market to create a great product and dominate it, then suddenly when it turns out the people with the success don't agree with your views and don't want them, you suddenly turn into communists with the end of forcing shit upon them.im glad you wanna be a cuck for the right of a hegemon to silence and oppress and imply that takes precedence over the right of the majority to exercise their freedom of speech.
the right to silence, all fine and dandy.
the right to free expression, thats a privilege? just fucking priceless.
why are you on here? fuck off to fecesbook, bootlicking faggot. go shill for their authoritarian rights there. maybe theyll give you a promotion.
You're a retarded faggot mong and nothing will ever penetrate your 9 inch thick retard skull if you cannot comprehend this point: you are directly eroding all of OUR right to control our own mother fucking property, purely so you can somehow reverse engineer a retard logic that prevents people from kicking out Nazis (or whoever the fuck else they feel like).
I ain't got no problem if you make some right wing hosting service and ban left wing websites, start a right wing social media platform on it and then ban all left wingers because fuck them. That's literally freedom, a free marketplace of both goods and services as well as ideas.
So why the fuck do you have to be a CRYING LITTLE FAGGOT about it in reverse?
IF YOU CAN'T COMPETE, FUCK YOU. LISTEN, READ THIS CAREFULLY:
FUCK YOU. YOU DESERVE SHIT. IT'S A COMPETITIVE MARKETPLACE AND YOU LOST.
Don't whine like a faggot bitch when you get destroyed on every level in the free marketplaces of ideas as well as of commerce, and ask for the government to step in. Fuck you loser. FUCK. YOU. YOU GET SHIT. -
2021-01-23 at 3:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kev you forget a single enterprise monopolizes 99% of those services, im glad you wanna be a cuck for the right of a hegemon to silence and oppress and imply that takes precedence over the right of the majority to exercise their freedom of speech.
the right to silence, all fine and dandy.
the right to free expression, thats a privilege? just fucking priceless.
why are you on here? fuck off to fecesbook, bootlicking faggot. go shill for their authoritarian rights there. maybe theyll give you a promotion.
It's just the internet man. It's not real. -
2021-01-23 at 3:04 PM UTC
-
2021-01-23 at 3:05 PM UTC
-
2021-01-23 at 3:20 PM UTChead nigger, if you have to silence opposing views then you have LOST the marketplace of ideas. the daily stormer and all outlets were booming in popularity, being featured several times in the google search results for several topics unrelated to politics (such as star trek reviews) before google started interfering with the market and personally censoring pages it didnt like.
all im hearing is you whining about your right to oppress. youll be the one whining about the opposite when your dream comes true you little cocksucker, trust me. -
2021-01-23 at 5:28 PM UTCCoincidentally, DS just released an article directly relevant to this conversation
People keep talking about how the government might pass laws removing the First Amendment – but there isn’t any need to do that.
We are already a nation totally devoid of freedom of speech. America has less freedom of speech than any country in history, it’s just that they play these weird legalistic games with it.
Right now:
The government has worked with tech companies, through deregulation, tax incentives and infrastructure projects, to build the internet.
The government has claimed that tech monopolies are legal, even if they are unregulated.
While unregulated, these companies maintain special legal protections (basically reverse deregulation).
The government has done nothing to prevent tech companies from systematically working together through totally public international conspiracies to silence the ability of individuals to speak publicly.
The government fires people for political speech.
The government allows private companies, including companies that it contracts with, to fire people for political speech.
Communications platforms that are used primarily for personal communications, rather than publishing, are being shut down, and the government refuses to do anything about it.
All of the speech that is being silenced is in opposition to policies enforced by the government.
You are banned from gathering publicly, by the government.
You only have to take a single step back from all of the bullshit about “private companies” to see that this is an organized state policy to silence speech that the government disagrees with.
Do you read that to mean “the government can fund and arm a private army and they’re allowed to quarter in your house as long as the government doesn’t order them to quarter in your house”?
Unless that is your reading of the Third Amendment, then the government is currently violating the First Amendment.
You have a right to free speech. A conspiracy of companies colluding to take away that right is not “private companies making private decisions,” it is a conspiracy to violate your rights. These people doing the censorship will say openly that their goal is to stop people from speaking.
I made the analogy four years ago, and I will make it again.
Imagine that:
Every grocery store refuses you entry because of your politics.
Every restaurant refuses you entry because of your politics.
The government bans you from hunting in public parks.
You are told by the government and the media that you are not being denied a right to eat, because you can still grow your own food.
No one will sell you farmland, because of your politics.
All of that, according to our government, is legal and could happen now. -
2021-01-23 at 5:47 PM UTC
-
2021-01-23 at 5:52 PM UTC
-
2021-01-23 at 6:09 PM UTCOnly he's not. But you openly brag about it. Ain't that rich, bitch?
Find death. -
2021-01-23 at 6:11 PM UTC
-
2021-01-23 at 6:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Only he's not. But you openly brag about it. Ain't that rich, bitch?
Find death.
"Baxter Dmitry reports for Newspunch, April 3, 2019, that according to Paul Tatchell, a roommate of Joe Biden at the Syracuse University College of Law, Biden admitted he was sexually attracted to children.
Tatchell reportedly said that Biden “used to say it was his ‘civic responsibility’ and that if he didn’t ‘choke the chicken’ or ‘clean the hosepipe’ before spending time around children he wouldn’t be able to keep his hands off them.”"
no kid i hugged squirmed away from me, nor would i continue violating their personal space if they did do so as is the case with the creepy fuck you admire.
fucking rich indeed. i dont normally brag about having the social skills to respect someones personal boundaries, as it is expected of anyone over the age of 8 but if i am to be compared to that sicko you dickride, i guess i have reason to be proud to be somewhat normal. -
2021-01-23 at 6:43 PM UTCLol riiiiiight ya sick fuck
-
2021-01-23 at 7:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Clearly Lanny needs to delegate responsibility for this site's day-to-day operations to capable and devoted members such as myself.
its the fastest way to get banned for 5 minutes to complain that him and his faggot Wintermute wifey won't regulate this horseshit of Finny
wintermute apparently is Frala -
2021-01-23 at 8:01 PM UTCGood video Kev. Growing up I would often hear creepy like behavior that seemed normal by uncles and sometimes aunts. Even though pretty much all were by marriage. It was just acceptable in an earlier boomer period for them. But you never know. As this guy says, it doesn't mean most would act on it, but it's feeding the kids mind this is acceptable behavior, and they may start having f'ilter issues with their sexuality later on in life.
-
2021-01-23 at 8:03 PM UTC
-
2021-01-23 at 8:46 PM UTCYeah it seems like a completely reliable story from NewsPunch