2017-03-19 at 9:56 AM UTC
There was a theory developed hundreds of years ago. At the time Animal Magnetism was thought to be rather controversial but in the current climate I believe it is an integral component of a social psychology.
Let our consideration begin with a simple thought experiment. A room contains five individuals. One is a natural introvert and can be disregarded as a component of the social triangle. Two are extroverts in the extreme. The remaining two are 40/60 (a) and 60/40 (b) int/ext (termed splits) respectively and of opposite gender. The two extroverts are of the same gender.
We can then pose a question regarding what will happen in this room. Specifically in terms of social gravitation I believe a number of inferences can be made. 1. The chance of social volatility is increased when the extroverts coincide. 2. The introvert will abide by two things, a nondisclosure agreement in terms of interaction and a short span of conversation attention. 3. The splits will have low social volitility with either of the extroverts.
I earlier mentioned the social triangle. If each person is considered a point. There is a map from a to b that nessicarily uses e as a fulcrum gde c, d, form their own linear map. What this means is that in a set of 5 there is a mapped triangle and a mapped line. Regardless of intersection this should hold in that conversation will gravitate between a, b and, e regardless of the interaction between c and d.
2017-03-19 at 1:08 PM UTC
Is there any alcohol in the room?
2017-03-19 at 1:44 PM UTC
Why do you assume there is high social volatility between the extroverts?
