User Controls

Transhumanism and you!

  1. #81
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by DocFoster That sounds pretty dark. What of those with sigmenrs forced on them? Id sign up for testing or work in a heartbeat, but I have good reasons. Those with none and having it forced, that's like a cousin of rape

    Most people support mandatory vaccination, treating the incompetent even if they don't consent, mandating medical procedures doesn't seem inherently reprehensible. I'm not saying let's hack off everyone's limbs and replace them with cyborg prosthetics but forced "human augmentation" is already commonplace in our society.
  2. #82
    Originally posted by DocFoster Undue harm, lack of choice, no standards needed with freeform experimentation, just some well dressed least with a scalpel and some guys tied down

    So? Who gives a shit as long as you're not the one on the table?
  3. #83
    DocFoster Tuskegee Airman [concentrate my unpalatable boomer]
    Originally posted by Dargo So? Who gives a shit as long as you're not the one on the table?

    Thing is, with people like me who would volunteer for that, why would unwilling participants be nescessary?
  4. #84
    DocFoster Tuskegee Airman [concentrate my unpalatable boomer]
    Originally posted by Lanny Most people support mandatory vaccination, treating the incompetent even if they don't consent, mandating medical procedures doesn't seem inherently reprehensible. I'm not saying let's hack off everyone's limbs and replace them with cyborg prosthetics but forced "human augmentation" is already commonplace in our society.

    You raise some damn good points, especially considering I've benefited from a number of the things you've listed. But this a new field, testers should first be those in need for opt in, i doubt the forst guy to vaccinate a baby was just jamming that needle in, and hoping this works, he had data from prior tests, studies on how these things work, and certainly adult volunteers

    Fucking phone typing. Fixed

    Post last edited by DocFoster at 2017-03-18T06:31:56.030210+00:00
  5. #85
    Originally posted by DocFoster Thing is, with people like me who would volunteer for that, why would unwilling participants be nescessary?

    The question isn't one about necessity, but the morality of forcing someone into it.
  6. #86
    DocFoster Tuskegee Airman [concentrate my unpalatable boomer]
    Originally posted by Dargo The question isn't one about necessity, but the morality of forcing someone into it.

    I don't believe it's be moral, with a violation of bodily autonomy that's one major immoral check
  7. #87
    Originally posted by DocFoster I don't believe it's be moral, with a violation of bodily autonomy that's one major immoral check

    Yea...why? That's my only question.
  8. #88
    DocFoster Tuskegee Airman [concentrate my unpalatable boomer]
    Originally posted by Dargo Yea…why? That's my only question.

    Humans ought to have first say in control over their bodies, if not the man controlling himself, than who better? Can a controlled man be truly fulfilled in this?
  9. #89
    Originally posted by DocFoster Humans ought to have first say in control over their bodies, if not the man controlling himself, than who better? Can a controlled man be truly fulfilled in this?

    Again. Why? You still haven't given a reason behind your claims. People having independence is nice and all, but why should I care someone else's fulfillment. Why not just use them for personal gain?
  10. #90
    DocFoster Tuskegee Airman [concentrate my unpalatable boomer]
    Originally posted by Dargo Again. Why? You still haven't given a reason behind your claims. People having independence is nice and all, but why should I care someone else's fulfillment. Why not just use them for personal gain?

    On a more immediate basis people may revolt against you and try to bring you to some semblance of judgement by peers, most of which hold the same belief. I guess if you have a way to test without external consequences and no worry of personal safety, the only thing stopping you is petty morality, and the possibility of being ignored by the scientific community. Just "wrong" is the best I have. The golden rule and all that
  11. #91
    Originally posted by DocFoster On a more immediate basis people may revolt against you and try to bring you to some semblance of judgement by peers, most of which hold the same belief. I guess if you have a way to test without external consequences and no worry of personal safety, the only thing stopping you is petty morality, and the possibility of being ignored by the scientific community. Just "wrong" is the best I have. The golden rule and all that

    So, basically just gut feelings and personal preferences.
  12. #92
    DocFoster Tuskegee Airman [concentrate my unpalatable boomer]
    Originally posted by Dargo So, basically just gut feelings and personal preferences.

    When you boil it down like that, I guess, yeah
  13. #93
    Originally posted by DocFoster When you boil it down like that, I guess, yeah

    :/
  14. #94
    Tek is trenashumanism
  15. #95
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump Tek is trenashumanism

    who needs pussy ass robots when you have chemical godhood?
  16. #96
    Why not both?.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. #97
    DocFoster Tuskegee Airman [concentrate my unpalatable boomer]
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump Tek is trenashumanism

    What is this tek you always talk about, friend?
  18. #98
    Originally posted by Dargo Nah, death is like a gift.

    Start giving, kill yourself.
  19. #99
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by DocFoster On a more immediate basis people may revolt against you and try to bring you to some semblance of judgement by peers, most of which hold the same belief. I guess if you have a way to test without external consequences and no worry of personal safety, the only thing stopping you is petty morality, and the possibility of being ignored by the scientific community. Just "wrong" is the best I have. The golden rule and all that

    Originally posted by Dargo So, basically just gut feelings and personal preferences.

    Ya, i was going to say you can't argue from consequences. Like, if you don't do X then Y will happen. That's not an argument.
  20. Originally posted by DocFoster What is this tek you always talk about, friend?

    and zendies
Jump to Top