User Controls
Transhumanism and you!
-
2017-03-18 at 5:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by DocFoster That sounds pretty dark. What of those with sigmenrs forced on them? Id sign up for testing or work in a heartbeat, but I have good reasons. Those with none and having it forced, that's like a cousin of rape
Most people support mandatory vaccination, treating the incompetent even if they don't consent, mandating medical procedures doesn't seem inherently reprehensible. I'm not saying let's hack off everyone's limbs and replace them with cyborg prosthetics but forced "human augmentation" is already commonplace in our society. -
2017-03-18 at 5:59 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 6:07 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 6:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Most people support mandatory vaccination, treating the incompetent even if they don't consent, mandating medical procedures doesn't seem inherently reprehensible. I'm not saying let's hack off everyone's limbs and replace them with cyborg prosthetics but forced "human augmentation" is already commonplace in our society.
You raise some damn good points, especially considering I've benefited from a number of the things you've listed. But this a new field, testers should first be those in need for opt in, i doubt the forst guy to vaccinate a baby was just jamming that needle in, and hoping this works, he had data from prior tests, studies on how these things work, and certainly adult volunteers
Fucking phone typing. Fixed
Post last edited by DocFoster at 2017-03-18T06:31:56.030210+00:00 -
2017-03-18 at 6:12 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 6:17 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 6:20 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 6:31 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 7:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by DocFoster Humans ought to have first say in control over their bodies, if not the man controlling himself, than who better? Can a controlled man be truly fulfilled in this?
Again. Why? You still haven't given a reason behind your claims. People having independence is nice and all, but why should I care someone else's fulfillment. Why not just use them for personal gain? -
2017-03-18 at 7:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by Dargo Again. Why? You still haven't given a reason behind your claims. People having independence is nice and all, but why should I care someone else's fulfillment. Why not just use them for personal gain?
On a more immediate basis people may revolt against you and try to bring you to some semblance of judgement by peers, most of which hold the same belief. I guess if you have a way to test without external consequences and no worry of personal safety, the only thing stopping you is petty morality, and the possibility of being ignored by the scientific community. Just "wrong" is the best I have. The golden rule and all that -
2017-03-18 at 7:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by DocFoster On a more immediate basis people may revolt against you and try to bring you to some semblance of judgement by peers, most of which hold the same belief. I guess if you have a way to test without external consequences and no worry of personal safety, the only thing stopping you is petty morality, and the possibility of being ignored by the scientific community. Just "wrong" is the best I have. The golden rule and all that
So, basically just gut feelings and personal preferences. -
2017-03-18 at 7:49 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 7:56 AM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 7:18 PM UTCTek is trenashumanism
-
2017-03-18 at 8:17 PM UTC
-
2017-03-18 at 8:18 PM UTCWhy not both?.
-
2017-03-19 at 1:28 AM UTC
-
2017-03-19 at 2:17 AM UTC
-
2017-03-19 at 2:53 AM UTC
Originally posted by DocFoster On a more immediate basis people may revolt against you and try to bring you to some semblance of judgement by peers, most of which hold the same belief. I guess if you have a way to test without external consequences and no worry of personal safety, the only thing stopping you is petty morality, and the possibility of being ignored by the scientific community. Just "wrong" is the best I have. The golden rule and all that
Originally posted by Dargo So, basically just gut feelings and personal preferences.
Ya, i was going to say you can't argue from consequences. Like, if you don't do X then Y will happen. That's not an argument. -
2017-03-19 at 4 AM UTC