User Controls
Who Do You Predict As Tomorrow Night's Debate Winner?
-
2020-10-23 at 2:09 AM UTCI would vote for himThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-23 at 2:14 AM UTCJoe: "cmon man"
Trump: "millions and billions"
Joe: *stutters* "cmon man"
Trump: *rolls eyes* "billions and millions"The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-23 at 2:23 AM UTC“We had a Republican Congress”
“Well you gotta talk em into it Joe” -
2020-10-23 at 2:37 AM UTCNow that was a debate.
Good job both candidates🇺🇸 -
2020-10-23 at 2:39 AM UTCNot since Abraham Lincoln, folks. He's done so much for the black... community. Nobody since Lincoln - maybe - has done more for them.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-23 at 2:39 AM UTCthe lady was a better moderator than that chris wallace faggot.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-23 at 2:39 AM UTC
-
2020-10-23 at 2:40 AM UTChush ur canadian ass up already
-
2020-10-23 at 2:40 AM UTC
-
2020-10-23 at 2:43 AM UTCew i was watching CNN's coverage of it i had to turn it off anderson "suck dicks" cooper came on i dont want to get HIVThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-23 at 2:49 AM UTC
-
2020-10-23 at 3:04 AM UTC
-
2020-10-23 at 3:12 AM UTCTrump sounded good, but the fact checkers are crushing him alive.
-
2020-10-23 at 3:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by STER0S lol that'd be funny if it turned out abraham lincoln hated blacks and only free'd them for the votes.
he pretty much did
the civil war was about the south having an economic advantage with slavery, not the rights of the slaves themselves. Lincoln actually offered (not sure if sincerely, considering everyone knew the south would reject it) to put forward a constitutional amendment to protect slavery so long as it was taxed to a degree that other forms of business were still viable -
2020-10-23 at 4:14 AM UTCAnd the south has been in poverty ever since. Fucking bastard.
-
2020-10-23 at 4:35 AM UTC
-
2020-10-23 at 4:47 AM UTCjoe always stutters when he gets debunked *dehurr my impediment!*
-
2020-10-23 at 4:48 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra he pretty much did
the civil war was about the south having an economic advantage with slavery, not the rights of the slaves themselves. Lincoln actually offered (not sure if sincerely, considering everyone knew the south would reject it) to put forward a constitutional amendment to protect slavery so long as it was taxed to a degree that other forms of business were still viable
The courts were actually super liberal back then which is part of what made the south split. Liberal of course meaning anti slavery, pro high import tarrifs, etc. It was the industrial revolution and the South having little industry and lots of agriculture didn't get things cheap. Suddenly to compete they found they needed equipment they couldn't afford, and they paid more for it
I think Lincoln was definitely an abolitionist based on sentiment he expressed long before having the power to do anything about it, but like the left today, he was trying to appeal to the right. Abolishing slavery would and did fuck the South over. They literally haven't recovered. All the poorest states are southern.
The tactic use of ex slaves in war was a great move, but just a bonus. He was VERY explicit about his moral views on it, but said that it was still constitutional and didn't want to act. Mainly he was avoiding the war that had been brewing for 15 years.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-23 at 4:53 AM UTCI think it was you that was asking about it last time, I looked it up and it was the Corwin Amendment I was referring to - basically making 'domestic arrangements' a state matter so that it could not be banned at the federal level, but using it as part of an offer to renegotiate trade agreements
-
2020-10-23 at 5:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I think it was you that was asking about it last time, I looked it up and it was the Corwin Amendment I was referring to - basically making 'domestic arrangements' a state matter so that it could not be banned at the federal level, but using it as part of an offer to renegotiate trade agreements
Didn't read
