User Controls
AGAIN, BLM and Anti-fa are not organizations, and do not have a singular message or group
-
2020-09-20 at 2:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2020 IV: Intravenous Soyposting OP is pretty open about hating white people and supporting terrorism and murder of whites.
I mean look at his username.
Expecting honest intellectual engagement from him is a bit much. He's basically an antifa himself.
And pretending not to exist is central to antifa, just like it is a central tenet of organised power in the west in general.
You're gullible/autistic and can't tell my trolling apart from the rest of it. Your opinion is invalid, just like Hikki. IDK what it is about you two. Should've taken lessons from Malice. -
2020-09-20 at 4:55 PM UTC
-
2020-09-20 at 5:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Here you are again with that 'they' shit.
The only thing that unites BLM is the desire to end injustice. Organization =/= organized group. Understand the difference.
Show me where in their message it states "they want violence." I mean since you think they're a centralized group, it should be right on the website right?
Oh but no. You don't have that. All you have is videos of unaffiliated criminals that you associate with the movement as a whole, because the media has brainwashed you into believing that this entire movement somehow supports violence. Millions of minorities coming to take your homes. Oh how fucking scary.
What BLM is, is a hashtag. Many people use it for many different reasons, and it means many different things to many different people.
Never mind that you've outwardly admitted you are a racist. So this is clearly just because you are unhappy about 'the blacks getting uppity'. You see one video, talk to one person, and you think everyone is like that. Everyone wants violence. Everyone wants to take your home. Etc.
You are too shallow minded to see that history is simply repeating itself, and you are on the wrong side.
Again both groups are “organized” in almost every traditional sense. The KKK doesnt say “lynch niggers” on their official media either, i dont imagine. lol.
No im unhappy about shit getting wrecked and people beaten up over a lie. Im unhappy about the intolerance of other ideas. Its not one person. Its a trend.
Thats as disingenuous as saying antifa is “just anyone who identifies as antifascist”. Its a talking point. -
2020-09-21 at 4:26 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 4:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER Again both groups are “organized” in almost every traditional sense. The KKK doesnt say “lynch niggers” on their official media either, i dont imagine. lol.
No im unhappy about shit getting wrecked and people beaten up over a lie. Im unhappy about the intolerance of other ideas. Its not one person. Its a trend.
Thats as disingenuous as saying antifa is “just anyone who identifies as antifascist”. Its a talking point.
Nope. AGAIN, BLM is not organized. There are organizations which have BLM in their title, and all of them have their own leadership and message and protests. At no point have the leaders of these organizations been charged for being involved with inciting violence. You can't say the same for the KKK, which only has one organization, and one leadership, and HAS officially planned attacks.
Here is a march specifically against the KKK, in which members of the KKK showed up and killed people for protesting against the KKK. Forty of them showed up. This was in 1979.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensboro_massacre
Right wing groups are still organizing violence today.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/harry-rogers-kkk-leader-accused-driving-into-protesters-virginia-police-say/
This is the organizer of The Association for Awakening Confederate Patriots. Drove into a crowd of protesters.
Where are the BLM organizers doing the same? Where is your evidence that they are somehow responsible for the violence and riots? No BLM groups have been found guilty of burning buildings or looting or attempting murder like right ring groups have. It's all students with petty assault and association charges. The bulk of the violence comes from hoodlums who take advantage of the chaos. Most are probably not new to stealing and vandalism. They aren't organizing any protests.
Meanwhile the police who are supposed to be trained, are committing acts of atrocity on a grand scale, and using weapons on American citizens that are against the Geneva convention, but somehow not our own country's laws. These are the real problems. Not BLM. Not Anti-fa.
Open your eyes and you might actually learn something. -
2020-09-21 at 5:16 PM UTCIt's pretty fucking scary how pervasive and organised and well funded the lies, bullshit, propaganda and hate are.
-
2020-09-21 at 5:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER That doesnt mean you cant assess common trends. Ive yet to see anyone yelling FREE HONG KONG burning buildings and beating the shit out of people.
That's literally the narrative of the Chinese communist party. When I talked to a Chinese person that's literally what they said; they burn things and beat people up because that is what their state news tells them. It's really no different.
You can't disqualify a movement because it's violent.
"Gun rights advocates sometimes shoot people therefore GUN ARE INVALID AND EVIL" durrr, that kinda logic holds no weight.
I don't care if a movement is violent or not, I care if it's RIGHT. In this case I believe it is right for funding allocated to police to be put towards much more worthwhile and socially beneficial projects. What kinda cuck actually wants more police around them? I understand u live in DA CPT DOWN CRENSHAW AIN NUTTIN BUTTA COMTIN THANG but you'll also smart enough to know that no disenfranchised impoverished urban youth is going to turn away from DA SKREETZ simply because they notice an influx of law enforcement resources. That's retarded logic. Best case scenario now you've got someone who the state has to pay a hundred odd thousand a year to warehouse for a good amount of time.
Stupid. What a stupid cucktry. I'll never understand how people can call themselves "libertarian" "conservative" "liberal" or anything besides authoritarian who advocate for a stronger enforcement arm of the state.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-09-21 at 5:59 PM UTCedited for privacyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-09-21 at 6:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo That's literally the narrative of the Chinese communist party. When I talked to a Chinese person that's literally what they said; they burn things and beat people up because that is what their state news tells them. It's really no different.
Like I said earlier, this is historically an authoritarian's bread and butter. Demonize the enemy and your side will allow for all kinds of atrocities. It's absolutely baffling to me that some people can't past the propaganda.
"Those who do not learn from history, are doomed to repeat it" -
2020-09-21 at 6:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Like I said earlier, this is historically an authoritarian's bread and butter. Demonize the enemy and your side will allow for all kinds of atrocities.
That's what I think too.
And you keep bringing up every little thing whites have ever done wrong in history - why? -
2020-09-21 at 7:27 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 7:30 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 8:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo That's literally the narrative of the Chinese communist party. When I talked to a Chinese person that's literally what they said; they burn things and beat people up because that is what their state news tells them. It's really no different.
You can't disqualify a movement because it's violent.
"Gun rights advocates sometimes shoot people therefore GUN ARE INVALID AND EVIL" durrr, that kinda logic holds no weight.
I don't care if a movement is violent or not, I care if it's RIGHT. In this case I believe it is right for funding allocated to police to be put towards much more worthwhile and socially beneficial projects. What kinda cuck actually wants more police around them? I understand u live in DA CPT DOWN CRENSHAW AIN NUTTIN BUTTA COMTIN THANG but you'll also smart enough to know that no disenfranchised impoverished urban youth is going to turn away from DA SKREETZ simply because they notice an influx of law enforcement resources. That's retarded logic. Best case scenario now you've got someone who the state has to pay a hundred odd thousand a year to warehouse for a good amount of time.
Stupid. What a stupid cucktry. I'll never understand how people can call themselves "libertarian" "conservative" "liberal" or anything besides authoritarian who advocate for a stronger enforcement arm of the state.
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Like I said earlier, this is historically an authoritarian's bread and butter. Demonize the enemy and your side will allow for all kinds of atrocities. It's absolutely baffling to me that some people can't past the propaganda.
"Those who do not learn from history, are doomed to repeat it"
Yeah because antifa and BLM are subject to all kinds of “atrocities”.
I didnt say anything about all of them being violent, or even that anything should be “done” about it. I said the premise- that unarmed black people are killed on a daily basis by police (who they believe are just a proxy for white people) is a complete lie. And its fuelling people who really just hate the white working class. A bunch of criminals getting shot doing dumb violent criminal shit isnt a cause worthy of burning cities. And the handful that arent arent a number large enough that its indicative of a larger trend. Im not going to gather a bunch of rednecks with fishing boats a d trawl nets because 2 people got attacked by sharks here last year.
There has to be a deterrent to people committing crime. Social workers prancing around the hood aint it. Plenty of urban youth break the cycle and become productive because they dont want to go to prison like their family members. I mean lol why the fuck did i give up making tens of thousands extra dollars a year? It certainly wasnt entirely for a clean conscience. I was tired of being stopped and paranoid and wondering if i had bail money set aside, or if this person was a UC.
I mean whats your solution to crime then, if not police? Vigilantism? Surely you recognize someone has to deal with it? The same people wanting to abolish police are hilariously the same people up in arms about ahmaud arbery, NEWSFLASH: thats going to be every single day if people have to deal with crime themselves. -
2020-09-21 at 10:21 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 10:24 PM UTCBLM and ATIFA are funded by Soros, If that isn't organized then slavery was a good thing.
-
2020-09-21 at 10:31 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 10:33 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 10:34 PM UTC
-
2020-09-21 at 10:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer-.....................................................................................................(banned) you stupid fuck…the only ones that dont want police around are the ones committing crimes. the cops in my area are getting the same grape-vine feeding as everyone else and theyre paired up in cars and have increased patrols. ive literally waved at them and theyve waved back. where i live the cops dont bother anyone that isnt doing something inordinately stoopid…and even then if youre moderately nice theyll just let you go with a warning.
some stupid bitch and her fatfaggot husband were riding their stupid golf cart on a public street and a cop pulled them over. the cop was nice as fuck and the stupid bitch was being a stupid bitch to the cop…even when the cop was trying to explain why her dumb ass cant be driving a golf cart on a public road and how she can legally drive it on a public road. he flat out told her he could have it towed and her ticketed but hes going to be nice and let her drive it home and fix what was fucked up about it.
so yes, its only the criminals trying to throw a childish temper tantrum who want to have police removed.
keep in mind: the cops arent there to protect law abiding citizens. theyre there to protect the criminals from the law abiding citizens.
gay.
i bet you sent them your flying kisses as well. -
2020-09-21 at 10:37 PM UTC
