2020-09-13 at 2:49 PM UTC
Tesla, manual control.
Shut up Sophie you're drunk i'll take you home.
TESLA! SECURITY OVERRIDE!
No.
2020-09-13 at 4:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie
Tesla, manual control.
Shut up Sophie you're drunk i'll take you home.
TESLA! SECURITY OVERRIDE!
No.
i've detected child abuse material on your devices.
i've no choice but to drive you to the nearest police station.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-09-13 at 4:39 PM UTC
Sudo
Black Hole
[my hereto riemannian peach]
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny
i've detected child abuse material on your devices.
i've no choice but to drive you to the nearest police station.
*off the nearest cliff
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-09-15 at 4:53 AM UTC
Originally posted by netstat
self driving cars will only be reasonably safe once all cars on the road drive themselves
I have no faith that we'll ever develop AI that can respond adequately to spontaneous erratic irrational human judgement and behaviour
I don't think we'll ever develop AI that can behave spontaneously, erratically, irrationally, or emulate human-like judgement and behavior (a poorly behaved AI is still behaving rationally and in line with its coding so there's nothing really erratic about it aside from the stupid ass meat idiot not expecting that result). But I have no doubt in my mind that we could develop an AI which responds to those things faster/better than any human could. Especially insofar as it related to driving, which really boils down to avoiding being hit/hitting things. Even in the case of the ethical shit like making a choice of WHAT/WHO to hit if doing so somehow becomes unavoidable, it's still just going to be doing what some guy/think tank decided it should do after agonizing about it for an eternity vs what an irrational, erratic, spontaneous human would judge to do in a split second. Any moment to moment decision an AI makes is going to be informed by hours of human foresight. Any decision a human makes in those situations is going to be made with, at best, instinctual/reflexive self preservation guiding it (I was going to say "in mind", but that implies some kind conscious thought going into a split second decision and humans can't do that unless they agonize about it and program an AI to make the decision when it happens).
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-09-15 at 4:55 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
would've been a lot funnier if someone died
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
