User Controls
Jacob Blake Was Not Murdered
-
2020-08-26 at 5:26 AM UTCThere were like 4 or 5 cops there too. If you need 4 or 5 cops to shoot a guy with a knife 7 times in the back that speaks to the level of training the officers have.
-
2020-08-26 at 5:30 AM UTCObviously not the same situation but yeah, this is a cop that's not scared and retarded
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-08-26 at 5:31 AM UTCThey kinda just shoot until the person stops being a threat. Sometimes just the threat of being shot is enough, Sometimes once. Sometimes 15-20 times isnt enough. You can find countless videos on liveleak n shit of people with some greivous fucking injuries-who continue to be a threat even as they bleed to death.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-26 at 5:35 AM UTCWell yeah the officer in that case could tell the thing in Minassians hand wasnt a gun. That makes a pretty big difference. Even if it was something like a hammer, i doubt any officers are going to just walk up and try to subdue the suspect by hand.
Reminds me of this one nigga in Prague or something who straight up sawed his own head off with a kitchen knife in front of officers. Metal as fuck. -
2020-08-26 at 5:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo He didn't have a gun. He may have had a knife on his person but he hadn't stabbed anyone with it.
Yet. He ignored them kept moving and reaching into his car, where they reasonably believed he was getting a gun.
Originally posted by Sudo Who gives a fuck if an officer gets slashed? That's part of their job to risk their life and in a perfect world, adhere to high minded ideals like not shooting the nigger 7 times in front of 3 children and the neighbourhood because he didn't listen to them. Nothing bad would have happened had it went another route. It's so sickening that the arm of the government can act this way with the populace when non compliant. Such a slippery slope
Don't be noncompliant then, and especially don't have a weapon out when you do it -
2020-08-26 at 3:34 PM UTCTheres no reasoning with sudo, hes a fuckin retard.
Hey sudo, when a cop tells you to do something, do it and you wont get shot, got it you faggot? -
2020-08-26 at 4:12 PM UTCThat cop should get the death sentence.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-26 at 4:16 PM UTC
-
2020-08-26 at 4:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Yet. He ignored them kept moving and reaching into his car, where they reasonably believed he was getting a gun.
Don't be noncompliant then, and especially don't have a weapon out when you do it
"dont be noncompliant" and "just follow the law" are the calls of the authoritarian cucks. "Just do what the government (or the arm of it) says" is terrible advice and a slippery slope to authoritarianism. He was breaking up a fight and ended up getting shot in the back 7 times in front of his children.
Then last night a white guy shot 3 people (killing two) then waltzed right past a swarm of police clearing displaying the firearm he had. Fucking weird world -
2020-08-26 at 5:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo That's making a very big inference to what he's going to the car to do. Apparently 3 of his kids were in the car. "Going to a location where there might be a weapon" is not how rules of engagement work, even in a war zone. Even if he was (which nothing says he is, nor did he) he shouldn't be shot for going to his car and/or disobeying what I imagine were police instructions. This is clearly an attempted murder by pigs because they were scared and stupid, like most Americans are. They could have tackled him or just fucked off or done absolutely anything but shoot him in broad daylight with children around.
He had a history of assault against police. The police knew this during the confortation. He had a gun pointed at him. He ignored the lawful orders issued to him. If you have history of violence against the police and you have a cop with a gun pointed at you telling you to get on the ground while you walk aroud your car and reach inside you are going to get shot no matter what color your skin or the officers skin is.
As far as fear I promise you that you would not have been able to handle the situation. -
2020-08-26 at 5:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo "dont be noncompliant" and "just follow the law" are the calls of the authoritarian cucks. "Just do what the government (or the arm of it) says" is terrible advice and a slippery slope to authoritarianism. He was breaking up a fight and ended up getting shot in the back 7 times in front of his children.
Then last night a white guy shot 3 people (killing two) then waltzed right past a swarm of police clearing displaying the firearm he had. Fucking weird world
How about this. Right or wrong you do what the man with the gun pointed at you says and get an attorney. If you follow a cops instructions you will not be shot. -
2020-08-26 at 7:23 PM UTCShooting an unarmed person, especially in the back, is a crime. Period. Full stop.
-
2020-08-26 at 7:27 PM UTC
-
2020-08-26 at 7:28 PM UTC
-
2020-08-26 at 7:46 PM UTCDo you never google anything? I know your ancient brain holds the Wisdom of the Ages, but......nah.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleeing_felon_rule
And from the screenshots i posted (unless manipulated), Blake was armed. -
2020-08-26 at 7:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER Do you never google anything? I know your ancient brain holds the Wisdom of the Ages, but……nah.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleeing_felon_rule
And from the screenshots i posted (unless manipulated), Blake was armed.
None of what you posted says an officer has the right to shoot an unarmed citizen. The officer must have "probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others". In this case, the citizen did not pose a threat of death or serious bodily harm, because the subject was not armed. An unarmed suspect does not pose a "significant" threat of death or bodily harm. You are reading the decision wrong, trying to read into it something that isn't really there. -
2020-08-26 at 8:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Shooting an unarmed person, especially in the back, is a crime. Period. Full stop.
Wrong. There are many circumstances where it is not. Just one for example, if the person being sht in the back was about to cause great bodily harm or worse to another. There are multiple cases of armed law abding citizens (non LEO) shooting armed robbers in the back. These are alamost always ruled to be justifiable. IF someone was kidnapping a minor child you be be fully justified, under the laws of the United States, if you shot the would be kidnapper in the back. If you attempt to run someone over with a car are you aremd? Under the law unarmed doesn't mean you are not in poseesion of gun, knife, club, or any other item desigend with the purpose being a weapon. Almost any item can be a deadly weapon under the law. If you are under arrest and you reach for a weapon being shot in the back should be your expectation as it would be legal. -
2020-08-26 at 8:11 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-08-26 at 8:17 PM UTC
-
2020-08-26 at 8:26 PM UTCHow do you know he's African? Maybe he's from Trinidad and Tobago?
