User Controls

What username was he

  1. #41
    his name was Zimmy
  2. #42
    Frank Zok
  3. #43
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Totse 2001 How come the FBI agent never mentioned Zoklet's owner's real name?

    does he have redacted informant status.. and if so, how did the reporters find him?

    His name is Aaron Holloway.
  4. #44
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by -SpectraL His name is Aaron Holloway.

    No relation to Nathalie. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
  5. #45
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Page 1
    Approved: Mu
    CHRISTOiHER D. FRE
    Assista t United S tes Attorney
    -snip-

    did you OCR that? if I recall correctly zok originally posted a photo of the subpoena, not a transcript
  6. #46
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by aldra did you OCR that? if I recall correctly zok originally posted a photo of the subpoena, not a transcript

    Not a subpoena. It's a probable cause summary for the arrest warrant.

    https://regmedia.co.uk/2011/05/12/lucas_henderson_criminal_complaint.pdf
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. #47
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Interesting that, in addition to the wire fraud statutes, they also used the 18 U.S. Code § 2(a, b) against him, which basically means they alleged Henderson caused someone else to commit the counterfeiting/wire fraud.
  8. #48
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 550 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, § 332, 35 Stat. 1152).

    Section 2(a) comprises section 550 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., without change except in minor matters of phraseology.

    Section 2(b) is added to permit the deletion from many sections throughout the revision of such phrases as “causes or procures”.

    The section as revised makes clear the legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who “aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures” another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States.

    It removes all doubt that one who puts in motion or assists in the illegal enterprise but causes the commission of an indispensable element of the offense by an innocent agent or instrumentality, is guilty as a principal even though he intentionally refrained from the direct act constituting the completed offense.

    This accords with the following decisions: Rothenburg v. United States, 1918, 38 S. Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L. Ed. 414, and United States v. Hodorowicz, C. C. A. Ill. 1939, 105 F. 2d 218, certiorari denied, 60 S. Ct. 108, 308 U.S. 584, 84 L. Ed. 489. United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S. Ct. 340, 300 U.S. 41, 81 L. Ed. 493, rehearing denied, 57 S. Ct. 505, 300 U.S. 687, 81 L. Ed. 888.
    Amendments

    1951—Subsec. (a). Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted “punishable as”.

    Subsec. (b). Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted “willfully” before “causes”, and “or another” after “him”, and substituted “is punishable as a principal” for “is also a principal and punishable as such”.

  9. #49
    Originally posted by -SpectraL His name is Aaron Holloway.

    Source
  10. #50
    His name is sux dick for cash
  11. #51
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump His name is sux dick for cash

    Source
  12. #52
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Pretty sure it was Maxwell.
  13. #53
    I came into a conversation on IRC .. he was talking about his degree and worker for the feds. Not sure if he meant as an asset or as an actual agent.

    that's why he never got into trouble. he never had legal fees.. he ran the site because it's an experimental virtual watchlist and while this is happening (especially under totse) the real bad guys came into virtual trollland and reported to everyone their intent.

    Who could of did this and pulled it off. the idea of guys with box cutters taking over a plane is amusing as fuck. Your first response is fear.. watch.. wonder what is going to happen. almost the majority of men and some women on the plane would of eyed each other and said "Fuck this" and as a group.. ran towards the bad guys. it takes one guy and the response of human nature for most is to jump in and aid in a brawl.

    A bunch of skinny middle eastern guys with box cutter "Ill cut you.. let me just cut your throat". get fucking real. story sucks. burning kerosene didn't cause the building to pancake into itself. it might of snapped and rolled off the rest of the building but not straight down.

    Faggoted story. not to mention Building 7 and Pentagon in that one place had the only 2 servers.


    AND WHERE ARE THE VIDEOS FROM THE 80 PLUS SECURITY CAMERAS KNOWN TO BE ON THAT SIDE OF THE BUILDING>

    Faggoted story. people knew in advance. Jeff Hunter is a real person. met him at Cafe Italiano, Walnut Creek California (no longer in business but the building is still there).

    Owned an ISP Ethernet business on South California Walnut Creek
    Owned a computer fix it store prior to that on Main Street.. just 2 blocks from the Cafe Italiano.

    March 2001 a 40-50 page thread with much of it as a documented threat taken off by waybackmachine.




  14. #54
    Originally posted by -SpectraL His name is Aaron Holloway.



    Originally posted by Totse 2001 Source

    It's true

    When he posted the TTFN his PI got spammed all over the forum
  15. #55
    benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by Totse 2001 Source

    sauces are totally unnecessary in the age of alternative facts.
  16. #56
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by benny vader sauces are totally unnecessary in the age of alternative facts.

    Depends on your interpretation of "facts". For example, it could be a "fact" to you that you saw a pink elephant in the clouds, and your testimony could be used as a factual account in court, but from another person's perspective, your testimony is not a fact, it is merely a personal belief. So, yes, in the world we now live in, there CAN be alternate "facts". "Facts" are no longer a thing which has been scientifically established beyond all doubt; they are now sourced from belief systems, depending on which side of the fence those belief systems stand.
  17. #57
    Originally posted by Hash Slinging Slasher It's true

    When he posted the TTFN his PI got spammed all over the forum

    I don't know what TTFN is. Sorry.
  18. #58
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Depends on your interpretation of "facts". For example, it could be a "fact" to you that you saw a pink elephant in the clouds, and your testimony could be used as a factual account in court, but from another person's perspective, your testimony is not a fact, it is merely a personal belief. So, yes, in the world we now live in, there CAN be alternate "facts". "Facts" are no longer a thing which has been scientifically established beyond all doubt; they are now sourced from belief systems, depending on which side of the fence those belief systems stand.

    Sauced fact, urine idiot.
  19. #59
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Totse 2001 I don't know what TTFN is. Sorry.

    Ta Ta For Now... it's a goodbye-note the admin leaves after getting his ass handed to him in spades, which inevitably includes some bogus "explanation" for the closure, which conveniently has nothing at all to do with the real reason.
  20. #60
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Page 1
    Approved: Mu
    CHRISTOiHER D. FRE
    Assista t United S tes Attorney
    Before: HONORABLE THEODORE H. KATZ
    ‘ United States Magistrate Judge
    Southern District of New York
    SEALED COMPLAINT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _
    Violations of
    - v. ~ : l8 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 2320
    and 2
    LUCAS TOWNSEND HENDERSON,
    COUNTY OF OFFENSE:
    Defendant. : NEW YORK
    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, SS . :
    ANDRE G. CICERO, being duly sworn, deposes and says
    that he is a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of
    Investigation (“FBI”) , and charges as follows:
    COUNT ONE
    (Wire Fraud)
    1. From at least in or about July 2010, up to and
    including in or about March 2011, in the Southern District of New
    York and elsewhere, LUCAS TOWNSEND HENDERSON, the defendant,
    unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly, having devised and
    intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and for
    obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent
    pretenses, representations, and promises, transmitted and caused
    to be transmitted by means of wire and radio communication in
    interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals,
    pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and
    artifice, to wit, HENDERSON participated in a scheme to defraud
    coupon issuers and retailers through the creation and subsequent
    use of counterfeit online coupons, and, in furtherance of that
    scheme, HENDERSON caused the transmission of several of those
    counterfeit coupons over the Internet from Rochester, New York to
    an individual located in Springfield, Illinois.
    (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 . )
    Page 2
    COUNT TWO
    (Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods)
    2 . From at least in or about July 2010, up to and
    including in or about March 2011, in the Southern District of New
    York and elsewhere, LUCAS TOWNSEND HENDERSON, the defendant,
    unlawfully, intentionally, and knowingly did traffic and attempt
    to traffic in goods and services, and did knowingly use a
    counterfeit mark on and in connection with such goods and
    services, and did intentionally traffic and attempt to traffic in
    labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, emblems, medallions,
    charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, hangtags, documentation
    and packaging of a type and nature, knowing that a counterfeit
    mark has been applied thereto, the use of which is likely to
    cause confusion, to cause mistake, and to deceive, to wit,
    HENDERSON created and thereafter disseminated over the Internet
    various online coupons bearing counterfeit marks, including the
    “Powered by SmartSource” slogan and a distinctive border.
    (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2320 (a) (1) and 2 .)
    The bases for my knowledge and the foregoing charges
    are, in part, as follows:
    3 . I am a Special Agent with the FBI, and I have been
    involved in the investigation of this matter. The information
    contained herein is based upon my personal knowledge and my
    review of documents and records gathered during the course of
    this investigation, as well as information obtained, directly or
    indirectly, from other sources and law enforcement agents.
    Because this affidavit is being submitted for the limited purpose
    of establishing probable cause, it does not include all of the
    facts that I have learned during the course of the investigation.
    Where the contents of documents and the actions, statements and
    conversations of others are reported herein, they are reported in
    substance and in part, except where otherwise indicated.
    4 . Since at least in or about July 2010, I and other
    agents with the FBI have been conducting an investigation into
    the creation and subsequent distribution over the Internet of
    counterfeit online coupons. These coupons are designed to look
    like legitimate coupons that are offered on the Internet at
    www.SmartSource.com (the “SmartSource Website”) , and produced by
    News America Marketing, a subsidiary of News Corporation, which
    is based in New York, New York. The SmartSource Website offers
    discount coupons to consumers for a wide range of consumer
    products. Consumers who wish to obtain coupons for products via
    the SmartSource Website must first download software that enables
    Page 3
    them to print coupons. Once that software is installed, a
    consumer can review a list of coupons, make selections from that
    list, and print specific coupons from his or her home printer.
    These coupons typically expire within a period of anywhere from
    several days to several months .
    5. My investigation began when News America Marketing
    reported to the FBI that a rash of counterfeit online coupons, in
    the SmartSource likeness, were being redeemed in stores across
    the country. These counterfeit coupons consistently employ a
    logo which reads “Powered by SmartSource" as well as a
    distinctive border, both of which are trademarks that have been
    registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office by
    News America Marketing. Since the investigation began, these
    counterfeit coupons have ranged from lower priced consumer items
    such as energy drinks, beer, cigarettes and cosmetic products, to
    more expensive consumer items such as electronic goods, including
    X~Box and PlayStation video game consoles. From my conversations
    with individuals at News America Marketing, I have learned that
    when these counterfeit coupons are used by consumers, three types
    of losses can result. First, if the manufacturers of consumer
    products honor the coupons, which they often do to maintain
    relationships with their retailers, they bear direct financial
    loss when a retailer seeks compensation for a fake coupon that
    has been redeemed. Second, if the manufacturer does not honor
    the coupon, the retailer bears the cost. Finally, in both
    circumstances, consumers bear the cost of price increases passed
    on by manufacturers and/or retailers, particularly mom and pop
    stores, to cover the cost of the fraud. For example, in or about
    December 2010, $200, 000 worth of such counterfeit coupons for
    Tide laundry detergent were redeemed by consumers over a two to
    three week period. Notably, Proctor & Gamble, which
    manufacturers Tide and is the single largest coupon issuer in the
    United States, has never issued a single online print-at-home
    coupon. The costs associated with the redemption of those
    counterfeit coupons were subsequently borne by Proctor & Gamble
    and the various retailers victimized by consumers who redeemed
    the fraudulent coupons.
    6 . In the course of the investigation, I have
    identified a number of individuals posting, among other things,
    (1) counterfeit coupons; (2) advice concerning the redemption of
    these counterfeit coupons; and (3) instructions or tutorials for
    creating these counterfeit coupons on at least two Internet
    message board websites: www.4chan.org (the “4chan Website") and
    www.zoklet.net (the “Zoklet Website”) . Based on my training and
    experience, as well as my participation in this investigation, I
    know that users posting on these message board websites generally
    Page 4
    employ nondescript user names. In connection with this
    investigation, I have reviewed these posts and have identified
    the “handles” or “nicknames” used by two of the perpetrators of
    the criminal activity described above: an individual who refers
    to himself as “Coupon Guy" and another individual who has
    employed the user names “Anonymous123 , ” “Anonymous 234, " and
    “Anonymous3 4 5 . ”
    7. Based on my review of postings made on the Zoklet
    Website and information provided by internet service providers
    hosting the Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses associated with
    those posts, I know the following, among other things:
    a. Posts made on the Zoklet.net Website by the
    user “Anonymous123, " “Anonymous.234, ” and “Anonymous345” have, by
    and large, had anonymous IP addresses associated with those
    posts. Based on my review of those anonymous IP addresses, I
    believe that the individual employing those user names is using
    the Tor network. Tor is a system intended to enable online
    anonymity, by using specialized software and a network of servers
    to hide information about users’ locations and other factors
    which might identify them. Users of this system make it more
    difficult to trace internet traffic, including visits to
    websites, online posts, instant messages, and other communication
    forms, back to them. Tor works by relaying communications
    through a network of systems run by volunteers in various
    locations throughout the world. Because the IP address of the
    sender and the recipient are not both readable at any step along
    the way, someone engaging in network traffic analysis and
    surveillance at any point along the line cannot directly identify
    which systems are involved in the communication.
    b. On or about July 13, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymous123" posted fourteen (14)
    counterfeit coupons on the Zoklet Website, including coupons for
    PowerBars, Campbell's Soup at Hand, SmartOnes TV Dinners, Bagel
    Bites, and Magic Hat Beer, among other various food and beverage
    items. In so doing, “Anonymous 123” wrote in relevant part:
    “Most if not all of these have been tested. . . . For those who
    don’ t know how to reach the instructions that are on many of
    these, basically, you can print them off any old printer, on
    regular paper, and use them at most stores. In windows, just
    save the image to your computer, right click it, and choose
    print. Do full page photo print or something.” The IP address
    associated with this post was an anonymous IP address.
    Page 5
    c. On or about July 17, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymousl23” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website, in which that user indicated that a new tutorial
    for making counterfeit coupons was nearing completion, “from what
    coupon guy said on a certain image board the yesterday (sic) ”
    (the “July 17, 2010 Post") . The IP address associated with the
    July 17, 2010 Post was an anonymous IP address.
    d. On or about July 18, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymous123” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website. In that post, “Anonymousl23” wrote, among other
    things: “$7. 00 off a 40 oz bag of hershey' s kisses. Think about
    it. You can give someone special around 8x the chocolate you
    might normally be able to get them for the normal price. I don‘ t
    recommend you use 8 of these coupons at once though, as spending
    $8 (plus tax) , for about $60 worth of chocolate might look
    suspicious . " “Anonymous123" also included an image of “A Note
    From The Author" in this post, which “Anonywnous123” described as
    having been written by “Coupon Guy" in connection with the new
    tutorial for making counterfeit coupons. The IP address
    associated with this post was an anonymous IP address.
    e. On or about July 19, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymous234” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website, in which that user indicated that he had been
    banned from making posts under his previous user ID (i.e. ,
    “Anonymous123") and referenced his July 17, 2010 Post . Among
    other things, “Anonymous234” wrote: “Weird. I got banned for
    some reason. AFAIK I wasn’ t breaking any rules . Then again, I
    never read the rules either. ” The IP address associated with
    this post was an anonymous IP address.
    f. On or about July 22, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymous234" posted an image of the
    cover of a “How to Make Coupons" tutorial on the Zoklet Website,
    writing “If anyone is interested, here' s something Coupon Guy
    posted last night, to give people an idea of what to look for
    when he does release his new tutorial.” The IP address
    associated with this post was an anonymous IP address.
    g. On or about July 26, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymous234” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website, in which he admitted having a file of the “How to
    Make Coupons” tutorial on his hard drive. In addition,
    “Anonymous234” wrote: “ f you want some coupons for beer,
    here' s a few from my own collection. . . . What’ s more
    they’ 11 work at walmart self checkouts, at least the ones that I
    have tried. At walmart self checkouts, the watcher person wills
    Page 6
    till (sic) need to come over and check your ID. But as long as
    you don' t use more than $20 worth of coupons, they won' t have to
    check the coupons . ” “Anonymous234” also posted three counterfeit
    coupons for beer. The IP address associated with this post was
    an anonymous IP address.
    h. On or about September 29, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “AnonymousB45” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website, in which he claimed that the new version of the
    “How to Make Coupons" tutorial was just released and provided a
    link to the full copy of that tutorial, hosted on the 4chan
    Website. The IP address associated with this post was an
    anonymous IP address.
    i. On or about September 30, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymous345” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website, in which he stated that he previously employed
    the user ID of “Anonymous234 . " Among other things,
    “Anonymous345” wrote: “TRUTH! I'm looking at the tutorial with
    my own eyes. If you’ re at all familiar with the old coupon
    thread, which apparently is no longer a sticky, I'm the same guy
    as anonymous234. . ” The IP address associated with this post was
    an anonymous IP address.
    j . From reviewing information provided by the
    operator of the Zoklet Website, I know that an individual
    employing the user ID of “Anonymous345” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website on or about October 14, 2010 at approximately 2:17
    a.m. That posting recorded an associated IP address of
    129 .21. 82 . 115 (the “115 IP Address”) , and a host name for the 115
    IP Address associated with the Rochester Institute of Technology
    (“RIT”) .
    8 . From reviewing information provided by RIT, I know
    that from approximately 6: 06 p.m. on or about October 13, 2010,
    up to and including approximately 5:20 p.m. on or about October
    14, 2010, the 115 IP Address was assigned to RIT student LUCAS
    TOWNSEND HENDERSON, the defendant. I also know that HENDERSON
    has provided RIT with an e—mail address of
    “lucashenderson@gmail.com." '
    9. From reviewing information provided by Google,
    including information regarding session timestamps and
    originating IP addresses for logins of the Google e~mail account
    “lucashenderson@gmail.com, ” I know that on or about October 13,
    2010, the “lucashenderson@gmail . com” e-mail account was accessed
    six separate times, with each login recording the 115 IP Address
    as the originating IP address. Moreover, I know that on or about
    Page 7
    October 14, 2010 at approximately 7:14 a.m., the
    “lucashenderson@gmail.com” email account was accessed, at which
    time the 115 IP Address was recorded by Google as being the
    originating IP address for that login.
    10 . Based on conversations that I have had with
    various representatives of RIT, I know that LUCAS TOWNSEND
    HENDERSON, the defendant, is a member of the Class of 2013 and is
    currently enrolled in the College of Computing and Information
    Sciences at RIT. HENDERSON is pursuing a Bachelor of Sciences
    degree in Information Security and Forensics.
    11. Based on my review of information contained on the
    publicly available Facebook page for LUCAS TOWNSEND HENDERSON,
    the defendant, I have learned that HENDERSON posted that he has
    been employed with the RIT ITS Helpdesk since June 2010, and that
    he was employed by Walmart as a cashier in Lubbock, Texas from in
    or about January 2008 through in or about August 2008 .
    12. Based on my review of postings made on the Zoklet
    Website and information provided by internet service providers
    hosting the Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses associated with
    those posts, I know the following, among other things:
    a. On or about August 2, 2010, an individual
    employing the user ID of “AnonymousO” posted a message on the
    Zoklet Website in response to the July 26, 2010 message posted by
    “Anonymous234” (whom I believe to be LUCAS TOWNSEND HENDERSON,
    the defendant) set forth in paragraph 7 (g) , above. Referencing
    the three counterfeit coupons for beer that “Anonymous234” had
    posted, “AnonymousO” wrote: “The bud/bud light coupon worked at a
    grocery store. Tried at a gas station, and apparently they don’ t
    accept online coupons (like most gas stations, as it’ s already
    been mentioned) . We continued to press out luck at a Wal
    Green’s. The cashier wasn't questioning it, he was just saying
    “Wow, that' s a hell of a coupon, So thank you, very much, anon,
    for 24 beers for ~$4."
    b. The Zoklet Website recorded the IP address of
    98 .228 .134 .184 (the “184 IP Address") as associated with the
    August 2, 2010 post by “AnonymousO . ”
    Page 8
    13 . Comcast Cable Communications (“Comcast”) provides
    Internet service and is the owner of the 184 IP Address. From
    reviewing documents obtained from Comcast, I know that the name
    and physical address associated with the 184 IP Address at the
    time of the August 2, 2010 post by “AnonymousO” described above
    in paragraph 12 was an individual with a residential address
    located in Springfield, Illinois.
    14 . On or about March 16, 2011, I and other law
    enforcement agents executed a search warrant issued by a United
    States Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court for
    the Western District of New York at the current residence of
    LUCAS TOWNSEND HENDERSON, the defendant. At that time, and among
    other things, I and other law enforcement agents recovered a
    number of coupons for various food and beverage items. Based on
    my training and experience, as well as my familiarity with this
    investigation, I believe these coupons to be examples of
    counterfeit online coupons in the SmartSource likeness.
    15. In addition, on or about March 16, 2011, in
    connection with executing the search warrant described above in
    paragraph 14 , I and another FBI agent advised LUCAS TOWNSEND
    HENDERSON, the defendant, that he was free to leave and did not
    have to answer any of our questions. However, TOWNSEND elected
    to provide the following information:
    a. When asked about the Zoklet Website,
    HENDERSON indicated that he had heard of it, but “ [couldn’ t] say
    for sure” whether he had posted messages on it.
    b. When asked about the 4chan Website, HENDERSON
    indicated that he had heard of it, had visited it, and had
    probably posted messages on it in the past.
    c. When asked about his use of Tor, HENDERSON
    stated, “I use Tor on occasion. ”
    d. When asked about producing coupons, HENDERSON
    stated, “I did write the manual. I wrote what I could. I
    thought it was an interesting thing. Some of it’ s putting on an
    air, not necessarily my point of view. ”
    Page 9
    e. When asked whether he was “Anonym0us123, "
    “Anonymous234 , ” and/or “AnonymousB45, " HENDERSON stated, “Most of
    the time.”
    WHEREFORE, deponent respectfully requests that a
    warrant be issued for the arrest of LUCAS TOWNSEND HENDERSON, the
    defendant, and that he be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as
    the case may be.
    ANDRE G. CICERO
    Special Agent
    Federal Bureau of Investigation
    Sworn to before me this
    10th day of May, 2011
    ,,,,,,
    HONORABLE THEODORE H. KATZ
    UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
    SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


    TL;DR
Jump to Top