User Controls

Is Fona a Fag?

  1. #41
    Erekshun Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You could screencap in Linux and Unix before windows.

    Off topic

    Is fona a fag?
  2. #42
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Erekshun Off topic

    Is fona a fag?

    According to screencaps that SpectraL couldn't take before Windows yes.
  3. #43
    Originally posted by Grylls No it's not

    You only dislike it because you don't understand it

    *snickers*
  4. #44
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You could screencap in Linux and Unix before windows.

    The BBS was TelNet access. TelNet is MS-Dos. You can't screencap in MS-Dos.

    It was netcat or socat on UNIX.
  5. #45
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The BBS was TelNet access. TelNet is MS-Dos. You can't screencap in MS-Dos.

    It was netcat or socat on UNIX.

    TelNet was developed in 1969 long before Windows and long before Bill Gates stole DOS. It was and still is usable in Unix and Linux.
  6. #46
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker TelNet was developed in 1969 long before Windows and long before Bill Gates stole DOS. It was and still is usable in Unix and Linux.

    Point is, TelNet was used over MS-Dos, and MS-Dos doesn't have screen capture capability, just like I said. You could "copy" a file, in that you had to download it first and then open it, and we were talking about ratio BBS sites. If you didn't have the download credit on the BBS, you weren't able to view or "copy" or download the text file. You couldn't just screencap something you couldn't even download, and anyways, MS-Dos and TelNet didn't have screen capture capability.
  7. #47
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Point is, TelNet was used over MS-Dos, and MS-Dos doesn't have screen capture capability, just like I said. You could "copy" a file, in that you had to download it first and then open it, and we were talking about ratio BBS sites. If you didn't have the download credit on the BBS, you weren't able to view or "copy" or download the text file. You couldn't just screencap something you couldn't even download, and anyways, MS-Dos and TelNet didn't have screen capture capability.
    That is a limitation of MSDOS not Telnet. You could screen cap if you were using a real OS.
  8. #48
    whoa.

    geezer tech wars.
  9. #49
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I was so slow, it might take you 10 minutes to download a text file. 600 baud.
  10. #50
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL I was so slow, it might take you 10 minutes to download a text file. 600 baud.

    So you have abandoned the screencap argument. Good to know...
  11. #51
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker So you have abandoned the screencap argument. Good to know…

    I already proved you wrong on that.
  12. #52
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL I already proved you wrong on that.

    No, all you "proved" is that your knowledge is limited to MS operating systems.
  13. #53
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker No, all you "proved" is that your knowledge is limited to MS operating systems.

    No, I proved you wrong about being able to screencap in the '80's.
  14. #54
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL No, I proved you wrong about being able to screencap in the '80's.

    You could screen cap a Telnet session in Unix in the 70's. But you have proven one other thing. Nobody ever told you about a little 39kb thing called Screen Thief for DOS.
  15. #55
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You could screen cap a Telnet session in Unix in the 70's. But you have proven one other thing. Nobody ever told you about a little 39kb thing called Screen Thief for DOS.

    Screen Thief only came out in the 2000's.
  16. #56
    Octavian motherfucker
    Anyone understand what these Incels are talking about?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. #57
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Screen Thief only came out in the 2000's.

    Wrong again it was already at V 2.89 in 1998. V b.901 was released in 1985. I had ran an early beta on a TRS-80 COCO II in 1983 when I connected to Compuserve the first year they were online with a 900 BAUD acoustic modem.
  18. #58
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Wrong again it was already at V 2.89 in 1998. V b.901 was released in 1985. I had ran an early beta on a TRS-80 COCO II in 1983 when I connected to Compuserve the first year they were online with a 900 BAUD acoustic modem.

    Another lie. Screen Thief only came out in 1993. This fact can easily be proven.
  19. #59
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Another lie. Screen Thief only came out in 1993. This fact can easily be proven.

    Then prove it don't just type it. But you say it's another lie. Are you saying that you couldn't screencap period before Windows? Because that isn't a lie is just ignorance.
  20. #60
    A College Professor victim of incest [your moreover breastless limestone]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Then prove it don't just type it. But you say it's another lie. Are you saying that you couldn't screencap period before Windows? Because that isn't a lie is just ignorance.


    would you just quit arguing with the Wise-One , doyle head

    its like you always want to try to get a leg up over him yet as hard as you flex it always backfires. honestly none of it makes any sense
Jump to Top