User Controls
New surveillance footage shows Armed Robbery walking around construction site
-
2020-05-13 at 1:43 AM UTCAlso, regardless of the pics, nothing was ever stolen per the homeowners attny.
I do admit tho, being in there at night would be asking for trouble. I’ve gone into constructions sites not near my home, but not at night. -
2020-05-13 at 1:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER Suspect crosses from the clear right side of the vehicle, to the front left where TM is standing, runs at younger mcmichael, begins wrestling for the shotgun, and strikes McMichael.
that is the only relevant fact to the situation. the nigger attacked the white gentleman and that fact is indisputable. its on video for anyone to see.
this is called 'self defense' -
2020-05-13 at 1:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Also, regardless of the pics, nothing was ever stolen per the homeowners attny.
I do admit tho, being in there at night would be asking for trouble. I’ve gone into constructions sites not near my home, but not at night.
irrelevant. the presence inside a home is sufficient probable cause to indict on burglary.
that is the literal equivalent of finding someone passed out drunk, asking them if you can fuck them in the ass, then when they dont reply and you fuck their ass, being not guilty of rape because they didnt say 'no.'
youre an idiot -
2020-05-13 at 1:48 AM UTCThe challenge for the prosecution is going to be trying to argue that these guys were just out to kill someone bc he was black. Defense is going to argue these guys had good reason to believe this was the same suspect and that he was armed. Theyre going to say the weapons were legally owned and not brandished, that the older man didn’t even draw his weapon until shots were fired, indicating they did not expect that they would have to fire their weapons. Theyre going to say Arberys attack is what caused the first and second shots to go off, and that as soon as he had partial controlof the weapon he became a deadly threat.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-05-13 at 1:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Also, regardless of the pics, nothing was ever stolen per the homeowners attny.
I believe that's related to the earlier incidents of people being caught on camera on site, wording is difficult to know for sure but he's not supposed to talk about current investigations -
2020-05-13 at 1:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER The challenge for the prosecution is going to be trying to argue that these guys were just out to kill someone bc he was black. Defense is going to argue these guys had good reason to believe this was the same suspect and that he was armed. Theyre going to say the weapons were legally owned and not brandished, that the older man didn’t even draw his weapon until shots were fired, indicating they did not expect that they would have to fire their weapons. Theyre going to say Arberys attack is what caused the first and second shots to go off, and that as soon as he had partial controlof the weapon he became a deadly threat.
They should win as well. but w/ the fucking media's "jogging" narrative & idiots like Technologist online, they'll likely feel pressured & go w/ "negligent manslaughter" definitely not murder though. -
2020-05-13 at 1:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER The challenge for the prosecution is going to be trying to argue that these guys were just out to kill someone bc he was black. Defense is going to argue these guys had good reason to believe this was the same suspect and that he was armed. Theyre going to say the weapons were legally owned and not brandished, that the older man didn’t even draw his weapon until shots were fired, indicating they did not expect that they would have to fire their weapons. Theyre going to say Arberys attack is what caused the first and second shots to go off, and that as soon as he had partial controlof the weapon he became a deadly threat.
Open carry and citizens arrest are legal in Georgia and judging by the video they had guns but didn't even point them at the jogger until he charged them down.
He had the option to talk to them or to run away, but he thought he could beat buckshot with fists apparently. -
2020-05-13 at 1:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Open carry and citizens arrest are legal in Georgia and judging by the video they had guns but didn't even point them at the jogger until he charged them down.
He had the option to talk to them or to run away, but he thought he could beat buckshot with fists apparently.
Citizens arrest is only legal if you witnessed the crime, or have intimate knowledge of the crime. The yahoos have neither.
I’ve gotta say, I have no idea what I’d do if I saw two yahoos with guns, knowing how blacks can be treated by people just like finney.
I don’t understand running away, there’s nowhere to hide and the father yahoo has a heightened shot site. -
2020-05-13 at 2:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by G They should win as well. but w/ the fucking media's "jogging" narrative & idiots like Technologist online, they'll likely feel pressured & go w/ "negligent manslaughter" definitely not murder though.
He could have very well been jogging but he attacked them. Everything prior isn't really relevant in self defense. Their reason for approaching him may have been wrong but so was attacking themThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-05-13 at 2:11 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Citizens arrest is only legal if you witnessed the crime, or have intimate knowledge of the crime. The yahoos have neither.
I’ve gotta say, I have no idea what I’d do if I saw two yahoos with guns, knowing how blacks can be treated by people just like finney.
I don’t understand running away, there’s nowhere to hide and the father yahoo has a heightened shot site.
niggers are treated the way they are because of the way they behave. you should know that, nigger lover.
post stories of how your nigger pet beats you because you deserve it.
and enjoy it. -
2020-05-13 at 2:15 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Citizens arrest is only legal if you witnessed the crime, or have intimate knowledge of the crime. The yahoos have neither.
Trespassing is a crime, as well having a firearm stolen from a car in front of their residence on a an earlier date by someone fitting his description. One's a retired LEO, I'm pretty sure he knew the protocol lol. -
2020-05-13 at 2:16 AM UTC
-
2020-05-13 at 2:17 AM UTC
-
2020-05-13 at 2:18 AM UTC
-
2020-05-13 at 2:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Robbery vs misdemeanor trespassing. You gonna chase a guy down in your truck for trespassing on a construction site?
learn the legal definitions, idiot. it wasnt a robbery...no one else was present.
it wasnt trespassing, idiot. as soon as the nigger entered the dwelling it became a burglary.
youre an idiot. -
2020-05-13 at 2:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Ernst Kaltenbrunner that wasnt trespassing. the nigger was in a dwelling. that is burglary.
In criminal law, dwelling means a building or part of a building, a tent, a mobile home, or another enclosed space that is used or intended for use as a human habitation.
A good lawyer will point out it was not enclosed as it was under construction. But you can trespass into burglary w/no breaking & entry. Either or, kid was caught & decided to bail then played dummy & got his dummy prize. Darwin was no fool. -
2020-05-13 at 2:22 AM UTC
-
2020-05-13 at 2:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by G In criminal law, dwelling means a building or part of a building, a tent, a mobile home, or another enclosed space that is used or intended for use as a human habitation.
A good lawyer will point out it was not enclosed as it was under construction. But you can trespass into burglary w/no breaking & entry. Either or, kid was caught & decided to bail then played dummy & got his dummy prize. Darwin was no fool.
entirely irrelevant.
a car isnt considered a dwelling but there is a crime of 'vehicular burglary'
no one is supposed to be living in a warehouse but if someone was caught wandering around in one who didnt belong theyd still be charged with burglary.
homeless niggers where i live have been arrested for 'vehicular burglary' when the occupant of the vehicle was giving the homeless beggar money because literally just the beggars hand entered the vehicle. -
2020-05-13 at 2:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Ernst Kaltenbrunner entirely irrelevant.
a car isnt considered a dwelling but there is a crime of 'vehicular burglary'
no one is supposed to be living in a warehouse but if someone was caught wandering around in one who didnt belong theyd still be charged with burglary.
homeless niggers where i live have been arrested for 'vehicular burglary' when the occupant of the vehicle was giving the homeless beggar money because literally just the beggars hand entered the vehicle.
A car is indeed a dwelling as one can be charged w/ "maintaining a dwelling for controlled substance" yadda,yadda for having dope stored in the car. It's all semantics that vary by state, but point being they had prior knowledge he had trespassed in that property & gave pursuit was my whole point. -
2020-05-13 at 2:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by G A car is indeed a dwelling as one can be charged w/ "maintaining a dwelling for controlled substance" yadda,yadda for having dope stored in the car. It's all semantics that vary by state, but point being they had prior knowledge he had trespassed in that property & gave pursuit was my whole point.
like i said...thats all irrelevant to the point that on a video it shows the nigger attacking the white gentleman, necessitating self defense.
