User Controls
Mexican cartel killed
-
2017-02-15 at 9:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by Discount Whore He is always trolling. Not worth responding to in any circumstance.
i literally do not troll. i mean all that i say seriously. trolling is not a thing i do.
Originally posted by BeigeWarlock You're troll'n us right? What about those umm Norweigan mother fuckers called Vikings? talk about barbarism. Shit, they got their asses handed to them in the county of clair, Ireland by the Conors and Deaighle(squiglyline_however_youspell_dysert_clan)
other than that.. you're a hypocrite of barbarisms
'but what aboutism'.
no, you fucking retard. of course everyone has acted barbarically in their past lives. but white people have genetic tendencies to strong social bonds that mean societies can form through common will rather than subjugation, and you know, we don't and never did cut out the hearts of thousands of people at a time, much less people of our own extended clan.
the natives of south america were disgusting savages that respected nothing but fear and force, and allowed each other to undergo the most horrible and retarded of systems.
fucking up regional neighbors in competition is one thing. on the whole we got along very well compared to the inferiors.
furthermore, your comprehension of 'vikings' and the history of northern european peoples is essentially cartoon tier.
fucking dumbasses i tell ya... don't want to see answers right in front of your face. -
2017-02-15 at 2:51 PM UTCVikings and Arabs were the first to use drugs to enhance themselves in battle.
Arabs were the first to distill alcohol. They used a coffee bean wine to boost their performance. Viking berserkers would go to war in a fully psychedelic mania. This made them overcome pain and tiredness and be able to use the full of their strength -
2017-02-15 at 3:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock mexico is a shithole…everyone knows that. even other spics hate messycans.
ill give you the benefit of the doubt. post the source. even though i know there is no such thing as a 7.62x45 gatling/minigun.
i know messyco has no apaches…that doesnt change the content of several news articles, as well as the title for the second video, clearly stating apaches were used. google it…see for yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Air_Force#Aircraft_inventory
They use blackhawks, UH-60Ms and UH-60Ls. Seeing as the bulk of their UH-60s have been purchased from the US, we can infer that they most likely kept our weapons systems on there. Now, they used to use m60Ds on them back in the day, but they've phased out the m60 in favor of the m240D or the m134 which fires the 7.62x51. Because the caliber he listed was 7.62x45, which is the same diameter as the NATO round fired out of the m134 and is shorter, 7.62x45 is compatible in the m134. So in short, you're wrongThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-02-15 at 9:53 PM UTC
-
2017-02-15 at 10:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by cerakote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Air_Force#Aircraft_inventory
They use blackhawks, UH-60Ms and UH-60Ls. Seeing as the bulk of their UH-60s have been purchased from the US, we can infer that they most likely kept our weapons systems on there. Now, they used to use m60Ds on them back in the day, but they've phased out the m60 in favor of the m240D or the m134 which fires the 7.62x51. Because the caliber he listed was 7.62x45, which is the same diameter as the NATO round fired out of the m134 and is shorter, 7.62x45 is compatible in the m134. So in short, you're wrong
from a ballistic's perspective...all I can say in reply is...what the stuttering full-retard fuck are you talking about?
-there are multiple variants of the m240, and I can't be arsed to see which, if any, the messycans do or don't use. the delta variant may or may not be the one on that helo, regardless of the design specs.
-there is no single-barreled gun with that rate of fire. the fastest singled barreled gun is Russian and it comes nowhere close to the rate of fire from a multibarreled gun. that in itself removes the possibility the gun is any that you listed, other than the mini/gatling. the video showed a gun firing at a rate far faster than any of the single-barreled rifles you mentioned.
- you are a fucking retard if you think chambering one type of round into the chamber of a rifle of different type of round is a good idea. I'm not even going to explain the intricacies of internal ballistics to you but in summation, if you do what you suggested, you're more likely than not to blow your fucking face off. just because a bullet has a certain name doesn't mean it's then same diameter...nor is compatible. since a 7.62x39 has the 'same' diameter as a 7.62x51 or 7.62x45...you can use either of those two in a 7.62x39...rite?
- nothing I posted was wrong
- no one on this site has the ballistics background I do. I'm saying that for your benefit in an effort to keep you from making more posts making a fool of yourself. -
2017-02-16 at 2:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock from a ballistic's perspective…all I can say in reply is…what the stuttering full-retard fuck are you talking about?
-there are multiple variants of the m240, and I can't be arsed to see which, if any, the messycans do or don't use. the delta variant may or may not be the one on that helo, regardless of the design specs.
-there is no single-barreled gun with that rate of fire. the fastest singled barreled gun is Russian and it comes nowhere close to the rate of fire from a multibarreled gun. that in itself removes the possibility the gun is any that you listed, other than the mini/gatling. the video showed a gun firing at a rate far faster than any of the single-barreled rifles you mentioned.
- you are a fucking retard if you think chambering one type of round into the chamber of a rifle of different type of round is a good idea. I'm not even going to explain the intricacies of internal ballistics to you but in summation, if you do what you suggested, you're more likely than not to blow your fucking face off. just because a bullet has a certain name doesn't mean it's then same diameter…nor is compatible. since a 7.62x39 has the 'same' diameter as a 7.62x51 or 7.62x45…you can use either of those two in a 7.62x39…rite?
- nothing I posted was wrong
- no one on this site has the ballistics background I do. I'm saying that for your benefit in an effort to keep you from making more posts making a fool of yourself.
Dude read my last post where I quoted the official information from a local news and quit making a fool of yourself.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-02-16 at 2:55 AM UTCIf he's not trolling he's most certainly retarded.
-
2017-02-16 at 3:15 AM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Scratch Hemorrage Dude read my last post where I quoted the official information from a local news and quit making a fool of yourself.
i pretty much ignored it...and the 'article' for your benefit. that article was hypothetical and had no official information on the actual weapon or aircraft usedAmetralladoras del tipo 2 M240H de calibre 7,62 mm o 2 Minigun M134 de 7,62 mm, 2 GAU-19 de 12,7 mm (.50). También puede equiparse con cohetes, misiles antitanque, ametralladoras de 7,62 mm, o cañones de 20 mm o 30 mm.
not much credibility there. NO BLACKHAWK OF ANY VARIANT IS PHYSICALLY CAPABLE OF FIRING A 20mm OR 30MM CANNON AT THAT RATE OF FIRE.Después del hecho se habló mucho del poder de fuego con el que cuentan estos helicópteros…
ok? and...?
so,yea...pretty much a fluff article with no official statements of confirmation/denial...or any names of anyone giving official statements to be quoted, whatsoever.
your post must be what you meant as far as making a fool of yourself. you did it well...kudos -
2017-02-16 at 3:21 AM UTCi just checked a 'real' source of info.
as of 6pm yesterday, 14FEB2017...THERE IS NO OFFICIAL STATEMENT AS FAR AS WHAT HELICOPTER OR WEAPON WAS USED.
now stfu. -
2017-02-16 at 4:14 AM UTC
-
2017-02-16 at 4:19 AM UTC
-
2017-02-16 at 4:23 AM UTCITT bill the cat is a fagThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-02-16 at 4:23 AM UTC/theadThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-02-16 at 4:33 AM UTC
-
2017-02-16 at 4:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock from a ballistic's perspective…all I can say in reply is…what the stuttering full-retard fuck are you talking about?
-there are multiple variants of the m240, and I can't be arsed to see which, if any, the messycans do or don't use. the delta variant may or may not be the one on that helo, regardless of the design specs.
-there is no single-barreled gun with that rate of fire. the fastest singled barreled gun is Russian and it comes nowhere close to the rate of fire from a multibarreled gun. that in itself removes the possibility the gun is any that you listed, other than the mini/gatling. the video showed a gun firing at a rate far faster than any of the single-barreled rifles you mentioned.
- you are a fucking retard if you think chambering one type of round into the chamber of a rifle of different type of round is a good idea. I'm not even going to explain the intricacies of internal ballistics to you but in summation, if you do what you suggested, you're more likely than not to blow your fucking face off. just because a bullet has a certain name doesn't mean it's then same diameter…nor is compatible. since a 7.62x39 has the 'same' diameter as a 7.62x51 or 7.62x45…you can use either of those two in a 7.62x39…rite?
- nothing I posted was wrong
- no one on this site has the ballistics background I do. I'm saying that for your benefit in an effort to keep you from making more posts making a fool of yourself.
he argued that the blackhawks were armed with miniguns, which may or may not be true. most likely, it was a misnomer by the faggot liberal media and it was actually an M240, which is a single barreled MG, but even if they were meaning a minigun as in the 6 barreled m134, he would still be correct
i cited evidence to support my argument and you have none
my point can be further supported by looking at the dates the mexican government purchased the blackhawks and when the armament of them was changed from the m60d to the m240d or m134
you cant refute a point by "what kind of [7th grade-tier vulgar descriptor] are you saying? ur so stupid u dont know what ur talking about lole"
also, concerning the caliber of the weapon, it doesnt appear that 7.62x45 even exists for MGs (the vz58 shoots this cartridge but i couldnt find anywhere saying that the mexican military uses this, their main service rifle shoots 5.45x39). with that being said, the nato round used in mostly all us weapons is 7.62x51. the bullet is smaller in a 7.62x45, but the diameter of the cartridge is the same, so assuming that this catridge would possibly be in their MGs, it would fire. its no bigger than the caliber it was originally chambered in, so it wouldnt obstruct anything, and its the same diameter so it would still be able to be loaded into belts for the nato round.
an example of this is the .357 and .38 caliber rounds. sure, theyre different lengths, but a revolver chambered in .357 can still shoot a .38 caliber bullet. and as long as the cylinder for a .38 revolver was long enough to take a .357 bullet, it could shoot it just fine
also, the m240d is the only variant made for aircraft
Post last edited by cerakote at 2017-02-16T05:00:12.413056+00:00
Post last edited by cerakote at 2017-02-16T05:07:20.070998+00:00The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-02-16 at 5:04 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock NO BLACKHAWK OF ANY VARIANT IS PHYSICALLY CAPABLE OF FIRING A 20mm OR 30MM
unless the weapon mounting systems were fitted for a 20 or 30mm gun, he is correct, the blackhawk could not. the us military (who mexico purchased a majority of theirs from) didnt ever implement a 20 or 30mm weapons system on any variant of blackhawk i believe -
2017-02-16 at 5:11 AM UTCStop trying to argue with a peanut. You will get nowhere arguing with nuts.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-02-16 at 5:16 AM UTC
-
2017-02-16 at 1:19 PM UTCthe bigly caliberThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-02-16 at 11:03 PM UTCITT bill the cat is fundamentaly wrong about the plight of the fundamentals of the plight of geo-derpa-globalism
