User Controls
Deleted posts for: i like pie
-
2020-03-10 at 3:39 AM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 3:42 AM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 3:44 AM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 8:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz No shit retard, and if all your signal analyzing equipment is fried along with your standard radio communications, your sigint is rendered useless. And that's a huge part of modern warfare.
Of course I do, I've known about this shit for years, minus some of your terminology. You must've missed the quote, there isn't a lot of non-russian research on these weapons to read about, but there are certainly improvised variants which are not far fetched at all.
You're some lame kike shill troll, as Andre Cicero pointed out. The fact you have to keep getting banned and coming back with alts to spam useless crap just proves that he's right. Even a schizo can figure you out apparently.
i dont have any SIGINT anything to get fried (unlike your three functional brain cells that are fried like an omlet in a frying pan at ground zero of tsar bomba.) you have no idea what youre talking about. nothing youre saying is making any sense. your posts are the literal example of what law enforcement and mental health professionals would 'profile' as traits defining a mentally ill person. youre the epitome of a 10-96
based on what youre typing you dont know jack diddly shit squat. you need to be careful what you try to gibber on about because someone who actually knows the reality of it might be reading it and only too happy to point out what an idiot you are.
you obviously have no idea who i am. ive never been banned. -
2020-03-10 at 8:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz And yes it probably is the cheapest way, and can basically be combined as I mentioned, with multiple plates/charges as in a tandem charge but with multiple penetrators.
stfu. you are literally gibbering on about something you have demonstrated that you are completely clueless about. EFPs are not cheaper...and manufacturing the actual penetrator is not cheap. they are only slightly less precise in metrological detail requirements than what is required to form an effective core for an implosion type nuke. if the angle of incidence of the explosion in relation to the penetrators isnt perfect the device loses several orders of magnitude of efficiency and effectiveness.
and stop saying copper. only nigger-tier weapons manufacturers use copper anymore. theres better shit out there now.
and stop hyping up shit that you have no idea about. EFP is not blast fragments/shrapnel. and there are much worse things than EFPs
and stop being an idiot -
2020-03-10 at 8:44 PM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 8:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Childbirth was a cakewalk compared to this. Hell, kidney stones were a cakewalk compared to this.
You know how they have the pain scale of 1-10? My doctor will tell you that I truly experienced a 10. Worst pain evah. I couldn’t move, sit up, nothing without severe pain. My hubby made a bedpan for me. I literally didn’t eat for 2 weeks due to the fear of getting up to poop.
pray you never find yourself splayed out in my laboratory. your experiences will be measured with several more decimal places added to your previous puny single digit enjoyments. -
2020-03-10 at 8:50 PM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 8:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz Nah but if I ever decide to track someone down to sell their organs, you'll be my top choice. Anyway, kr0z has bipolar and a lot of people with that condition won't take meds for it, so yeah, he's a lil mental but at least he always finds a new job.
i have an organ i can sell you. -
2020-03-10 at 8:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Bill Krozby Yeah but you just make up stuff because ive called you an idiot. The reason why i dont like certain jobs is because I get bored easily and don't like a lot of people.
I need to find something that works just for me.
Im hoping to inherent my parents tomato and pepper ranch
you better pray that eugenics never comes back into a societal norm
i guarantee youll be the first to be euthanized
tomato and pepper ranch. what a retard. -
2020-03-10 at 9:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Go in with a huge boner. Walk right up to her and slap her face, and then tell her you're the boss around these parts and she better watch her tongue. Then stride up to the big boss's office and let the boss know you don't work for her either.
theres not enough undocumented orifice exploration or torn orifices in that plan -
2020-03-10 at 9:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz Now you've proven you have no knowledge of this subject. You are a moron, the technology is extremely simple, that's why the article I linked to mentions them being more worried about EFPs, not "finny alt's tandem charge recipe", retard
EDIT: government kike shill
They don't want people knowing how effective EFPs are, so they send this little shill attack gerbil in here to say "ur wrong dur dur hur" without any details as to why they'd disagree, making retarded claims like "EFPs are not cheaper" lmao
if they're improvised they sure as hell can be, dumb shit
youre fucking hilarious. im pissing my britches laughing at you.
lets play a game. you post a picture of a real life EFP that youre holding in your hand and ill post a real life EFP (actually made of copper since it was made in the 90s before they invented better penetrator materials) and well have a survey on who has the better EFP pics. never mind. i dont give enough of a fuck to dig through my garage to find the film.
the article you posted is exactly what you are accusing me of. go read about 'anarchists cookbook' and how it was a CIA COINTELPRO publication. if you had a modicum of brain power...which you dont...youd realize that national policy is to not publish details and specifics...and most butt-fuckingly certainly not photos... of any actual IED. i will confirm with factual accuracy, real life experience, and actual documented verification as a literal weapons expert, that those photos do not depict functional EFPs. if those objects were attached to a high explosive they would be blast fragments...nothing more than really heavy nails in the more common IEDs.
if you werent a retard youd realize that EFP-based devices are actually trivial in effectiveness compared to other types of 'unconventional' weapons. one of which is the king of the hill. no, im not going to tell you. if you figure it out on your own ill tell you. as a hint, the IED-versions are actually 'cheaper' to make than EFPs, much more effective in certain environmental conditions, and so common and easily constructed as to be literally impossible to legislate. the government manufactured versions are so 'effective' that there have been talks of adding them to the hauge/geneva/whatever yammerings to have them banned. another hint is there have been several actual media reports and detailed articles inadvertently describing them...describing ones intentionally created/constructed, and ones accidentally created.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-03-10 at 9:44 PM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 9:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz lmao
Is that what your DD214 tells you? That's cute and all but;
no.One of the methods for quickly producing a super-critical mass of plutonium for a nuclear explosion is to fashion a sub-critical mass of Pu-239 in a spherical shape and then set off high explosives to drive it inward. A spherical shell of high-explosive material is made up of fitting pieces (called "lenses" to focus the explosion inward) which are wired with detonators to set them off simultaneously. This creates enough force to increase the density of the sphere of plutonium to the point where it is super-critical.
you go get yourself a fissile mass of plutonium, fashion it into a sphere, and set off a high explosive.
see how well that works to make a nuklurear esploshun.
the point is...that 'spherical shape' has to be spherical in shape to such perfection that it would compete with the webb telescope mirror for angular perfection. if it isnt perfectly spherical and perfectly aligned with the explosive charge to detonate at the perfect angular relationship, you get a big loud non-nuclurear sploshun that sprays radioactive plutonium all over the place. same with an EFP. you dont take a slab of whatever-shaped copper, slather it with some HE, spark it off, then gleefully hop around saying you made an EFP. no, you just made something go 'bang' that launched a $4.99/lb chunk of copper in some direction at some veloci-titty relating to the explosive used.
youre an idiot. stop talking to me. -
2020-03-10 at 10:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz lmao
Is that what your DD214 tells you? That's cute and all but;
EDIT:
Learn how to improvise. When you don't need someone else to hold your hand, then get back to me, faggot
article from 07, and this moron thinks that improvised EFPs aren't everywhere or are somehow difficult to make correctly? what a retard, or kike shill.
I'd have to go with shill since this is the kind of information they piss their pants over, they send in their double digit IQ attack gerbil to attempt to discredit or confuse anyone on this subject
now you can tell me how you feel that i give so little of a fuck about you and your idiocy that i couldnt be bothered to walk out to my garage to dig through my pictures of actual EFPs showing pre-detonation submunitions and post-explosion slugs dug out of dirt to prove my point that the pictures in that article you linked are little to no relation to real life. -
2020-03-10 at 10:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz lol now this retard is talking about radioactive materials as if that has anything to do with this subject
shows how little you grasp a basic concept.
the point im making is that making a functional EFP isnt as simple as youre making it out to be. the penetrator has to be a certain shape in relation to the explosive before it will be an actual EFP instead of just a slug of explosion-launched fragmentation
youre taking this whole thing to a level far and away beyond full retard. youre approaching full-kroz at this point. -
2020-03-10 at 10:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz It's less to do with the shape and more the metal used actually, but you're a moron and I don't expect you to understand this concept very well. Copper is a common choice, not so much because of density, but because it's extremely 'malleable'.
I know shills like you aren't allowed to think outside the box though, it's okay finny
youre so adorable how you keep on with this like a retarded chihuahua with its favorite plush toy.
youre so stupid that no matter what i tell you or what accurate information i provide your lack of mental ability and some sort of neurodegenrative disorder prevent you from having any thought processes that are even remotely related to a sane person. you keep going on and on about something youre clueless about and keep blathering on about it which only accomplishes showing how fully fucktarded you are.
no, its all about the penetrator shape in relation to the explosive charge. i read the wiki article too, so i can see where youre getting your information from. the fun part is that what the internetz sayz and what the real life applications are have an inconvenient tendency to not always jibe. especially when idiots such as yourself throw a giant monkey wrench into the translation of things. copper is only a choice in weaponized EFPs because it is cheaper and more easily acquired than the 'better' choice for a weapons-grade EFP. no, they arent going to find this metal in an IED nor are you going to find an actual photograph of one online.
go back to the part where copper EFPs are nigger-tier. there is a 'better' metal used by modern professional designers. im not telling you what it is but it has eight letters in the name. -
2020-03-10 at 10:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra that's really the point though isn't it - EFPs are supposed to be cheap and dirty, there are better anti-armor options if you're not making them in a cave somewhere
EFPs are related to shaped charges. theyre actually incomplete shaped charges where if the EFP were cone-shaped and thinner instead of retro-lens shaped and blocky theyd 'jet'-ify and become jets instead of molten 'blobs/globs'
shaped charges are cheaper and exponentially easier to produce. their limiting factor is the distance between the actual detonation and where the target lies because the usable life of the compacted liner is miniscule. an actual EFP has a longer range because it is a solid-ish object with exponentially more mass and inertia.
the blocks of metal shown in that article that the retard posted a link to are absolutely not viable as the penetrator in an EFP. those shapes will not deform to create the elongated blob that is an actual EFP. what will happen if those chunks of metal are assembled into a device with the hopes of creating an EFP is that the detonating explosive with launch the chunk of metal at some high velocity, depending on the explosive used, where it will impact a target as shrapnel or fragmentation. yes, at the speed an HE charge will launch a large hunk of metal to, that hunk of metal will rip thru a lightly armored vehicle with impunity and take out body parts with absolutely no difficulty whatsoever. a chunk of copper moving at anything less than six-figure FPS velocities wont overly adversely affect any modern tanks armor. the same chunk of copper that is an actual EFP will rip through modern tank armor, depending on the location on the tank and the armor type. -
2020-03-11 at 1:53 AM UTC
-
2020-03-11 at 1:53 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz lol
Yeah, but it's finny, he's just here to wave his cock around and say "i read wikipedia, tantalum is better!!11zz da military ones i have photos of iz better den da copper ones im elite weapons expert lololz111!!1"
its not my cock waving around that you have to worry about. its when i jam it so far into your transverse colon that it puts your eye out.
