User Controls
Greek Riots (02-2020)
-
2020-03-08 at 11:07 PM UTChttps://twitter.com/i/status/1236579911915180033
Turkey running pogroms on migrant areas to 'encourage' them to go to Greece -
2020-03-08 at 11:09 PM UTChttps://twitter.com/i/status/1236779553613393927
LOL
Greek farmers patrolling the fence, spraying people who try to climb/tear it down with pig urineThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-03-09 at 10:29 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-03-09 at 10:31 AM UTC
-
2020-03-09 at 11:02 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-03-09 at 11:04 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-03-10 at 2:53 AM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 6:07 AM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 6:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz Anyhow, the best way to get through the 'active' armor, if it contains an HE as some does as a reaction to any high velocity projectile or shockwave, would be to have your plates stacked, with a higher VOD HE than the active armor contains.
And apparently, it would be better to make something like a CHAMP missile, with your EPFCGs stacked, if going the emp route. Not hard to do really.
EDIT: I came up with an idea for something like this on a much smaller scale and it made the feds real paranoid. If it weren't possible, they wouldn't have pissed their pants over the idea. I'm not the best engineer but they know I can come up with some of this stuff and make it work.
-
2020-03-10 at 5:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by i like pie youre an idiot. SIGINT is about electronics signals produced by electronic devices.
No shit retard, and if all your signal analyzing equipment is fried along with your standard radio communications, your sigint is rendered useless. And that's a huge part of modern warfare.
Originally posted by i like pie you have no idea what the fuck youre gibbering on about. youre an idiot. stop posting idiocy.
Of course I do, I've known about this shit for years, minus some of your terminology. You must've missed the quote, there isn't a lot of non-russian research on these weapons to read about, but there are certainly improvised variants which are not far fetched at all.
the sane people already know how to defeat ERA. its called 'tandem shaped charge'
You're some lame kike shill troll, as Andre Cicero pointed out. The fact you have to keep getting banned and coming back with alts to spam useless crap just proves that he's right. Even a schizo can figure you out apparently. -
2020-03-10 at 5:57 PM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 6:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra
basically you half-fill a tube with explosives and put a copper disc in front of the charge, when the charge goes off the pressure deforms the disc into a bullet shape and sends it out the other end fast enough to punch a big hole in an M1A1The effects of traditional explosions like blast-forces and metal fragments seldom disable armored vehicles, but the explosively formed solid copper penetrator is quite lethal—even to the new generation of mine-resistant vehicles (which are made to withstand an anti-tank mine), and many tanks.[14]
And yes it probably is the cheapest way, and can basically be combined as I mentioned, with multiple plates/charges as in a tandem charge but with multiple penetrators. -
2020-03-10 at 6:03 PM UTC
-
2020-03-10 at 6:14 PM UTC
“They were really bad,” Castner said, and by far the most-dreaded explosive device he encountered because of their deadly efficiency.
EFPs killed at least 196 U.S. troops and wounded nearly 900 between 2005 and 2011, defense officials revealed in 2015, and Castner said a high number of amputations throughout the war were the direct result of the weapons. In the 2006 attack, slugs took both legs off a soldier and one from a gunner, he wrote in his memoir, “The Long Walk.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2020/01/03/soleimanis-legacy-gruesome-high-tech-ieds-that-haunted-us-troops-iraq/ -
2020-03-10 at 8:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by i like pie EFPs are not cheaper…and manufacturing the actual penetrator is not cheap.
Now you've proven you have no knowledge of this subject. You are a moron, the technology is extremely simple, that's why the article I linked to mentions them being more worried about EFPs, not "finny alt's tandem charge recipe", retard
EDIT: government kike shill
They don't want people knowing how effective EFPs are, so they send this little shill attack gerbil in here to say "ur wrong dur dur hur" without any details as to why they'd disagree, making retarded claims like "EFPs are not cheaper" lmao
if they're improvised they sure as hell can be, dumb shit -
2020-03-10 at 9:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by i like pie stfu. you are literally gibbering on about something you have demonstrated that you are completely clueless about. EFPs are not cheaper…and manufacturing the actual penetrator is not cheap. they are only slightly less precise in metrological detail requirements than what is required to form an effective core for an implosion type nuke. if the angle of incidence of the explosion in relation to the penetrators isnt perfect the device loses several orders of magnitude of efficiency and effectiveness.
and stop saying copper. only nigger-tier weapons manufacturers use copper anymore. theres better shit out there now.
and stop hyping up shit that you have no idea about. EFP is not blast fragments/shrapnel. and there are much worse things than EFPs
and stop being an idiot
You're not as mean as you could be, with a name like pie. -
2020-03-10 at 9:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by i like pie i will confirm with factual accuracy, real life experience, and actual documented verification as a literal weapons expert
lmao
Is that what your DD214 tells you? That's cute and all but;The case of an improvised EFP is often constructed from a short section of well-casing pipe with a plate welded to one end. A small hole is drilled in the pipe to allow a blasting cap to be inserted. The pipe is then filled with high explosive and a metal liner, most often made of copper, is affixed over the open end of the pipe. EFPs utilize the same general principle as a shaped charge that focuses the power of an explosive device. In a traditional shaped-charge munition, like the warhead on an anti-tank rocket, a thin metal cone is used to achieve this focusing effect. When crushed, the convex metal cone in the warhead becomes a high-velocity projectile that, with a jet of super-heated gas from the explosive, penetrates the armor. In order for a shaped charge to work most effectively, however, it must have a relatively short standoff distance. The EFP munition is somewhat like a traditional shaped charge, but it incorporates a metal liner with less of an angle. So, instead of a cone, the liner is more of a concave lens or dish shape. The EFP also uses a heavier liner, which, when the device is detonated, is formed into a slug or "penetrator." The penetrator, then, is propelled at the target at an extremely high velocity. This difference in the shape and weight of the liner allows the EFP to be deployed from a greater distance than a traditional shaped charge. Because of its ability to focus the force of an explosive charge, a small EFP containing just a few pounds of high explosive can cause far more damage to an armored vehicle than can a traditional IED — even a large vehicle-borne one — made with far more high-explosive material. Cheap, Easy and Effective Because the components required to construct EFPs are simple, such devices can be fabricated inexpensively and out of readily available materials.
EDIT:
Learn how to improvise. When you don't need someone else to hold your hand, then get back to me, faggotThe EFP genie is out of the bottle. These devices not only are widely known in the military and militant realms, they even are showing up on television, in shows such as the Discovery Channel's "Future Weapons" program. Those responsible for protecting potential targets — not only in conflict zones — had best take notice because EFPs are coming soon and will be around for a long time to come.
article from 07, and this moron thinks that improvised EFPs aren't everywhere or are somehow difficult to make correctly? what a retard, or kike shill.
I'd have to go with shill since this is the kind of information they piss their pants over, they send in their double digit IQ attack gerbil to attempt to discredit or confuse anyone on this subject -
2020-03-10 at 10:01 PM UTClol now this retard is talking about radioactive materials as if that has anything to do with this subject
-
2020-03-10 at 10:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by i like pie shows how little you grasp a basic concept.
It's less to do with the shape and more the metal used actually, but you're a moron and I don't expect you to understand this concept very well. Copper is a common choice, not so much because of density, but because it's extremely 'malleable'.
the point im making is that making a functional EFP isnt as simple as youre making it out to be. the penetrator has to be a certain shape in relation to the explosive before it will be an actual EFP instead of just a slug of explosion-launched fragmentation
youre taking this whole thing to a level far and away beyond full retard. youre approaching full-kroz at this point.
I know shills like you aren't allowed to think outside the box though, it's okay finny -
2020-03-10 at 10:22 PM UTCwhat a moron
