User Controls
Dutch Scientists propose enormous €500bn dam enclosing North Sea
-
2020-02-25 at 2:27 AM UTC
-
2020-02-25 at 4:24 AM UTCanyone that asks, 'source' is braindead and doesn't have any business worrying about anything but their next meal.
'asking for source' is a dead give away that someone is a fucking moron. 100% accuracy of this guide. -
2020-02-25 at 4:30 AM UTC100% of people that think asking for a source is moronic, are themselves morons. It’s true.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-02-25 at 4:45 AM UTCLol I literally just watched this video. I don't think it will happen for some time but it will be a quantifiable result of climate change that will have a greater cost benefit than allowing sea levels to rise.
-
2020-02-25 at 4:48 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo Lol I literally just watched this video. I don't think it will happen for some time but it will be a quantifiable result of climate change that will have a greater cost benefit than allowing sea levels to rise.
It’s all just a hoax so George soros can sell more solar panels you fuckin dumbass! Don’t fall for der juden lies!!The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-25 at 4:51 AM UTC
-
2020-02-25 at 5:57 AM UTC
-
2020-02-25 at 5:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by snab_snib anyone that asks, 'source' is braindead and doesn't have any business worrying about anything but their next meal.
'asking for source' is a dead give away that someone is a fucking moron. 100% accuracy of this guide.
people asks for sources rhetorically and if you think people are seriously asking for sources to peer review them then your as retarded as the retards you call morons. -
2020-02-25 at 12:49 PM UTC
-
2020-02-25 at 12:57 PM UTC
-
2020-02-25 at 1:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox 100% of people that think asking for a source is moronic, are themselves morons. It’s true.
first of all, that's not true, second of all, i'm the only one. because i am the only one, you can't have known this even if it were true. you are a parrot, simply mimicking the act of speech, but you are not actually capable of language or communication. -
2020-02-25 at 1:19 PM UTC
-
2020-02-25 at 1:26 PM UTC
-
2020-02-25 at 1:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by snab_snib first of all, that's not true, second of all, i'm the only one. because i am the only one, you can't have known this even if it were true. you are a parrot, simply mimicking the act of speech, but you are not actually capable of language or communication.
No, it is true. We don’t need any independent verification, it’s true simply because I said it. -
2020-02-25 at 3:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Land at the poles has very poor insolation, as well as 6 month nights, so is just about useless for agriculture
But not if we warm up the planet. It will be prime farmland. Virgin soil with millions of years of sediment and nutrients dumped from glacier melt off. That is one of the reasons the plains states are so fertile. We had global warming about 25,000 years ago and it worked out really well. -
2020-02-25 at 3:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker We had global warming about 25,000 years ago and it worked out really well.
That needs some context. Yes the earth warmed up around that time, but it was coming out of an ice age back then. So actually it was just going back to normal levels, not really getting any hotter than usual.
Today, temperatures are rising faster and higher than they ever have in as far back in history as we can see. And it’s not being caused by nature, like an asteroid strike or volcano eruption. Changes that usually happen gradually over tens of thousands of years are happening on a scale of decades.
Here’s a little infographic even you could understand:
https://xkcd.com/1732/The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-25 at 3:52 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox That needs some context. Yes the earth warmed up around that time, but it was coming out of an ice age back then. So actually it was just going back to normal levels, not really getting any hotter than usual.
Today, temperatures are rising faster and higher than they ever have in as far back in history as we can see. And it’s not being caused by nature, like an asteroid strike or volcano eruption. Changes that usually happen gradually over tens of thousands of years are happening on a scale of decades.
Here’s a little infographic even you could understand:
https://xkcd.com/1732/
Normal levels of what? For millions of years the normal levels didn't sustain life. -
2020-02-25 at 4:05 PM UTCNormal as in levels seen before the ice age. The last glacial period only lasted about ten thousand years. Not millions. The last time temperatures were sustained at higher levels than they are today was over a million years ago.
Again, educate yourself
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-25 at 4:06 PM UTCWatt about before that?
-
2020-02-25 at 4:13 PM UTC
