User Controls

Posts by infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer-.....................................................................................................(b­anned)

  1. Originally posted by gadzooks Mutually beneficial sexual encounters aren't supposed to leave anybody "only slightly traumatized".

    which is why its so much easier to skip any concern with the well being of ones sex partners.

    'traumatized' is nowhere near as much fun leaving them 'catatonic and drooling in the fetal position with severe orifice trauma'
  2. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i did.

    you would
  3. Originally posted by Wariat https://tnf13stories.wordpress.com/2018/08/30/why-i-oppose-sex-offender-laws/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

    im going to rape your face so hard you get the worlds first cock lobotomy.

    learn how to internetz, you bumbling shitspamming idiot.

    also, no one clicks your stupid ass links, moron
  4. Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood I have been watching him since he was known as reviewbrah. now he's making the big bucks like anna spysys





    ????? wut

    that freak looks like richard simmons and pee-wee herman had such an excess of buttseks that one of them spontaneously impregnated the other and that kid is what squirted out into the toilet nine months later.
  5. Originally posted by Sudo That's literally the narrative of the Chinese communist party. When I talked to a Chinese person that's literally what they said; they burn things and beat people up because that is what their state news tells them. It's really no different.

    You can't disqualify a movement because it's violent.

    "Gun rights advocates sometimes shoot people therefore GUN ARE INVALID AND EVIL" durrr, that kinda logic holds no weight.

    I don't care if a movement is violent or not, I care if it's RIGHT. In this case I believe it is right for funding allocated to police to be put towards much more worthwhile and socially beneficial projects. What kinda cuck actually wants more police around them? I understand u live in DA CPT DOWN CRENSHAW AIN NUTTIN BUTTA COMTIN THANG but you'll also smart enough to know that no disenfranchised impoverished urban youth is going to turn away from DA SKREETZ simply because they notice an influx of law enforcement resources. That's retarded logic. Best case scenario now you've got someone who the state has to pay a hundred odd thousand a year to warehouse for a good amount of time.

    Stupid. What a stupid cucktry. I'll never understand how people can call themselves "libertarian" "conservative" "liberal" or anything besides authoritarian who advocate for a stronger enforcement arm of the state.

    you stupid fuck...the only ones that dont want police around are the ones committing crimes. the cops in my area are getting the same grape-vine feeding as everyone else and theyre paired up in cars and have increased patrols. ive literally waved at them and theyve waved back. where i live the cops dont bother anyone that isnt doing something inordinately stoopid...and even then if youre moderately nice theyll just let you go with a warning.

    some stupid bitch and her fatfaggot husband were riding their stupid golf cart on a public street and a cop pulled them over. the cop was nice as fuck and the stupid bitch was being a stupid bitch to the cop...even when the cop was trying to explain why her dumb ass cant be driving a golf cart on a public road and how she can legally drive it on a public road. he flat out told her he could have it towed and her ticketed but hes going to be nice and let her drive it home and fix what was fucked up about it.

    so yes, its only the criminals trying to throw a childish temper tantrum who want to have police removed.

    keep in mind: the cops arent there to protect law abiding citizens. theyre there to protect the criminals from the law abiding citizens.
  6. Originally posted by CASPER That doesnt mean you cant assess common trends. Ive yet to see anyone yelling FREE HONG KONG burning buildings and beating the shit out of people.

    they specifically target chinee-owned or chinee-supporters. they literally walk right past everything and everyone else.

    same as the ones in thailand a few years ago. not a single tourist was molestered.
  7. Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Report of the week always has me covered. He's out there reporting the REAL news like the Travis Scott Burger


    so thats where richard simmons and pee-wee hermans love child wound up
  8. Originally posted by ORACLE Wishful thinking from a fat cuck from the fattest, most fucked race. You couldn't even finish off 20 million jedis. Go cry and LARP about shit that lost and got destroyed 80 years ago faggot.

    you can be assured that the next kike pogrom will be the last

    you need to see more than 80 years of history to envision all that is the white man.

    now stfu and get back on your street corner, you useless nigger whore
  9. Originally posted by POLECAT we do have an over population problem,, unfortunately the rich powerhouses are never in the mix of extra deaths. they need to find a plague that will take out the rich and 20 somthings and maybe the scammers of the world,, not I could get behind that one

    we dont have an overpopulation problem

    s­hitskins have an overpopulation problem. caucasians and the more advanced mongoloid species have stabilized their populations and growth rates. the niggers and spics are fucking and shitting out sprogs like over breeding rats.
Jump to Top