User Controls
Posts by jesus enriquez
-
2020-03-01 at 10:54 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-29 at 4:21 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-29 at 4:16 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by Bill Krozby I use my phone as a flesh light to go to the 2 and half crappers at 3 in the morning and have the though like what if I shehoyeded it and slipped and it went into the crapper lol so I be extra careful but shit happens. I'm going to the store tomorrow and see if these fags can just cram a new charger into it because I really don't want a new phone.
your dick is small enough to fit into the charging port of your flesh light cell phone -
2020-02-29 at 4:12 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-29 at 4:08 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-29 at 4:05 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-29 at 4 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-29 at 3:52 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by cigreting I am no longer taking your posts seriously. Any idiot knows more parts = more to fail. If that wasnt the case then every vehicle would be awd or 4wd since according to you "it doesnt pan out like that"
youre an idiot and the one that no one is taking seriously. 4WD is a valid, useful feature on vehicles and if it werent no one would buy the option. i dont know a single person where i live that owns a pickup truck that doesnt have 4WD on it.
the reason every vehicle doesnt have 4WD is because of cost. the same reason older vehicles didnt have auto trannys but came with manuals.
explain how modern automatic transmissions with 500 gears applies to your stupid theory in relation to a simple 4-gear manual transaxle. -
2020-02-29 at 3:49 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by snab_snib yep. there's really not much of a difference. i understand that the layman thinks 'more stuff = more complex = more break' but it doesn't pan out like that practically.
and in the case of a 4WD truck even if the transfer case breaks the truck is still a rear-wheel drive. with minimal maintenance the benefits of the 4WD far outweigh the costs.
ive been in the boonies and ripped apart a U-joint and/or the carrier bearing in a K10 trying to get out of sand. oops. disconnected the rest of the rear driveshaft...tossed it in the bed...and drove all the way home in front-wheel-drive.
also...i just remembered a few weeks ago doing something similar on a dump truck that ripped apart the rear U-joint. i have pics that i can post if i get around to it. -
2020-02-29 at 3:33 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by cigreting You have absolutely no clue what the fuck you are talking about. You are talking about a completely different situation based on how irrelevant that statement is
read the OP, idiot. the topic is the OP getting in a wreck while at work and his concern about going bankrupt due to the legal situation.
youre the idiot that keeps asking questions and expressing confusion about issues that were already pointed out in the OP -
2020-02-29 at 3:08 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by Cheyes Yeah thats a little more than i wanna i spend considering i could go completely broke here. With as much driving as i do that thing doesnt quite get the mileage i want. Neither do 4WD pickups.
2005 AWD CRV gets 22/27 which seems quite good for 15 years ago. Would be more in price range.
if you never go off-road you dont need 4WD
and dont listen to that idiot saying 2WD are more reliable than 4WD. 2WD and 4WD trucks are literally identical except for the front axle, differential, and xfer case. -
2020-02-29 at 3:05 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by Cheyes So, I'm NOT an independent contractor, I'm an employee (we are going to IOC very shortly) for a delivery company, but they made us give them proof of personal insurance,
where i live it is literally illegal for an employee to drive a company vehicle OR drive during working hours for work-related duties unless the employer has the employee (driver) on their vehicle insurance policy.
you need to talk to an attorney in the state you live in -
2020-02-29 at 3 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by cigreting I dont need to cite any law. I have my CDL so I know quite a bit about the requitements about driving for a company or being independent are. Its very simple, either he is or isnt an independent contractor. The rest of your post is irrelevant
you could have just said 'i have absolutely no clue about the legalities of such things' and saved yourself the embarrassment of trying to pretend you have a clue when its obvious you dont.
is or isnt wont stop a marginally decent lawyer from going after the company and holding them liable to the victim for damages. im not explaining the legalities of it -
2020-02-29 at 2:56 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by snab_snib yes, and more than that, i believe that the act of creating life is a more grave and serious undertaking than the act of taking life. wrongfully killing someone might cut short some of the happiness and good that a person could have experienced. but wrongfully creating someone could result in a lifetime of sorrow and suffering not just for that person, but for the people in that persons life, and unless the creation of a human is treated with respect for the huge responsibility involved, you are playing with a much more dangerous fire than mere murder.
and that is why wrongfully having sex should be considered as a serious crime, on par or worse than wrongfully having killing. our casual abuse of the greatest power any human has, for the mere pleasure of a moment, is a terrible indictment against our civilization.
marriage is nothing more than legalized prostitution -
2020-02-29 at 2:54 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by snab_snib yes, and more than that, i believe that the act of creating life is a more grave and serious undertaking than the act of taking life. wrongfully killing someone might cut short some of the happiness and good that a person could have experienced. but wrongfully creating someone could result in a lifetime of sorrow and suffering not just for that person, but for the people in that persons life, and unless the creation of a human is treated with respect for the huge responsibility involved, you are playing with a much more dangerous fire than mere murder.
and that is why wrongfully having sex should be considered as a serious crime, on par or worse than wrongfully having killing. our casual abuse of the greatest power any human has, for the mere pleasure of a moment, is a terrible indictment against our civilization.
im going to have sex with random strangers and get as many of them pregnant as possible then make them have abortions with a coathanger...which im going to make into a bisque that im going to serve at a luncheon in your honor. -
2020-02-29 at 2:52 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by snab_snib look i'm not innocent. in the past i regularly had sex for no good reason. i think people should be given a chance to change. but it's really time we start enforcing penalties for having sex outside of marriage and for reasons other than reproduction that are at least equal in severity to the penalties in place for capital murder, although i think for obvious reasons that having sex wrongly should be much more severely punished than simple murder.
you should go rape yourself -
2020-02-29 at 2:50 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
Originally posted by cigreting If he is an independent contractor then he needs his own insurance. I dont have enough information to make this call
unless you have established case law to cite, stfu. where i live its established state law that a victim can go after anyone remotely related to an incident. the most recent example i know of is a pedestrian on a sidewalk was hit by a vehicle that was (allegedly claimed) dodging a low-hanging cable line. (it was lower than normal but still 15 to 20 feet above the pavement) the victims lawyer sued: the driver, the drivers insurance company, the apartment complex whos sidewalk they were on when hit, and the cable company. it dont remember how much they won in total but it was five-figures.
where i live it is a simple question in business law relating to usage of a vehicle, pay rate (regardless of being 1099'd), workmans-comp insurance, etc., with the question being: 'were you performing job related duties at the time?'
this is why companies are required to have so many different types of state-mandated insurance -
2020-02-29 at 2:41 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-29 at 2:39 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez
-
2020-02-28 at 4:05 AM UTC in Deleted posts for: jesus enriquez