User Controls
Posts by Glokula's Homabla
-
2018-08-31 at 8:42 AM UTC in Best GHB content for alcoholIt's not enough ghb to even slightly do anything
-
2018-08-31 at 6:12 AM UTC in Schizophrenic users.
-
2018-08-31 at 5:07 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-08-31 at 5:06 AM UTC in i smeel mousepooplinted toast is an acquired taste like vegemite
-
2018-08-31 at 5:01 AM UTC in Schizophrenic users.what smells and has 4 toes? a frog
-
2018-08-31 at 4:59 AM UTC in i smeel mousepoopsometimes when i cant find a broom i just roll around on the floor
-
2018-08-31 at 4:57 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attentionthe frogloys
dahmer's frogs -
2018-08-31 at 4:55 AM UTC in Random Thoughtseheh =)
-
2018-08-31 at 4:55 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-08-31 at 4:54 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-08-30 at 4:06 PM UTC in Random Thoughtsa thread where stupid people post the one mildly original idea they have per 24 hours
-
2018-08-30 at 5:10 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
It is clear based on this data that a longer study period seems to be making the judgement worse (possibly a U shaped curve as function of time - for short term pitch learning) as all groups got worse with time. It's possible that if you tested the placebo group on day 2 of their study they might score as high as the VPA group. It's possible that the VPA could be actually impairing learning and thus giving the effect of day 2 to the VPA group. This would explain why no group scored above chance in the second arm (the group that was placebo at first learned something even with VPA, and so scored lower). In this case you would also expect the group that learned better (no VPA impairment) closer to the test to score lower (that is the placebo in the second arm), but this effect is not seen here. However, given the uncertainty of the results in both groups, the difference between the scores in the second arm is not statistically significant (they scored the same given the error of the score). Notice that the the uncertainty (length of the line) is highest in the VPA group in the second arm. This is a most curious result that should not be taken lightly, and one that I cannot provide an adequate hypothesis for.
https://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/67906-valproic-acid-allegedly-restores-the-plasticity-of-the-brain-to-a-juvenile-state/ -
2018-08-30 at 5:04 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
Originally posted by Lanny Anyone who uses words longer than six letter is obviously a psuedointellectual. There are no intellectuals in the world, or people with above highschool level literacy, only psuedointellectuals.
your favorite philosopher is wrong! i know this because i can bullshit my own opinion too! -
2018-08-30 at 5:03 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
notice how in both conditions the first test scores higher than the second test. that would imply that more perfect pitch practice = lower scores, so people do better identifying the tones when they dont have lots of exposure to it. so the increased score in the valproate first condition doesnt mean its giving them baby-tier brain plasticity, its just making them too drooling to learn anything. also sample size is too small
then malice would be like "muhhh nootropic its a article" while dismissing the fact that it actually causes brain damage in other conditions https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17823470 -
2018-08-30 at 4:58 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attentionor maybe im just mimicking you to show you how cringily you come off as
-
2018-08-30 at 4:57 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-08-30 at 4:51 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attentionlike for example malice was convinced low dose depakote would give him perfect pitch because he readdit in a head line. the proper way to tell him he's a retard for believing that would be to point out that pitch identification accuracy paradoxically usually goes down with an increased amount of trials/training, so basically taking a drug that would make him unable to learn anything because it slows down neurotransmission in the brain would lead to higher perfect pitch scores because they never really develop past the first trial. then you would send him the pubmed articles about how depakote causes encephalopathy.
instead u would be like "yeah sure you're gonna take a drug that will give you the ability to embody the piano solid plan" which is actually totally devoid of contributing content except being paradoxically unamusing -
2018-08-30 at 4:46 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attentionbut you dont have a scientific, quantitative, or logical mind so instead of being able to rebut scientific articles with superior research, you can only go into self-validated truisms to support your counterarguments because if you shit out enough lines of sarcasm or baseless contradictions which sound right to you eventually you'll have a whole paragraph and boy when you have a paragraph you sure know what you're talkin bout
-
2018-08-30 at 4:34 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attentionwhen u were able to jerk off with him about stuff that can never be proven or relevant to anything you were content, when he brought up actual scientific articles you would get scared and go "but ackstrusally"
-
2018-08-30 at 4:29 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
