User Controls
Posts by Daily
-
2018-02-19 at 1:55 AM UTC in What's your IQ?
Originally posted by lightray last time i took it, it was
extraversion 22
agreeableness 1
conscientiousness 1
neuroticism 99
openness to experience 29
u?
I did Jordan Peterson's one on understandmyself.com, which is a lot more comprehensive than the average free one online. It was only about £5 because I had a discount code. For every trait, there are 2 sub-traits
Agreeableless 2
- Compassion 4
- Politeness 3
Conscientiousness 38
- Industriousness 38
- Orderliness 41
Extraversion 82
- Enthusiasm 59
- Assertiveness 90
Neuroticism 22
- Withdrawal 12
- volatility 38
Openness 83
- Intellect 92
- Creativity 57 -
2018-02-19 at 1:37 AM UTC in What's your IQ?sploo what's your big 5 personality traits
-
2018-02-19 at 1:06 AM UTC in Bill Krozby trying to steal somebody's phone in public (with evidence)I like how he immediately stopped laughing after the reality of his physical inferiority and lack of heart came crashing down both literally and metaphorically
What a despicable fucking rat cunt
How will Bill Krozby ever recover -
2018-02-19 at 12:38 AM UTC in Bill Krozby trying to steal somebody's phone in public (with evidence)What the fuck is up with this faggot's weird laugh
-
2018-02-19 at 12:31 AM UTC in What's your IQ?Just slightly below sploo's
-
2018-02-19 at 12:12 AM UTC in Policeman beheaded and son has heart/skin removed while alive
Originally posted by Jeremus TL;Dr: you are not drawing the line that connects the reality that there are genetic similarities within populations, to the justifiability or usefulness of classifications like negroid, Caucasoid, mongoloid, australoid, graboid etc.
As for phenotypical realities, tell me about them. I can some very superficial ones like skin colour, but even those are on a spectrum and you need to define very clearly where to draw the line. If you're going to go for something like facial features, I can point out that the facial features of two individuals within one of these "races" can be just as different as those from another "race".
Don't make broad declarations about "phenotypical realities", tell me what these realities are that you believe in, and how they clearly correlate to these groupings.
I know we're all at least 30% trolls here, but please don't be disingenuous by saying I'm building a strawman and then accusing me of caring about 19th century classifications like caucasoid, negroid, fucktoid, etc. Stop asking me "where do you draw the line" when I specifically said two posts ago that the lines between ethnic populations are blurry and can be divided into many different sub-divisions which I already agreed are a product of the human brain.
Can you please tell me where the red ends and where the red begins? What about the blue? What about the green? Where do you draw the line? I sure don't know, but that does not deny the fact that we can look at most of the shades of each colour and understand using nothing but sight which colour is which in the general sense. Just because we do not know where to draw the line does not mean that individual colours cannot be recognised. We look at the colour of blood, or the colour of a strawberry, or the colour of a persian rug and we understand on a general level that each of these things are red.
The same thing can be applied to the global human population. Yes, there has been immigration, yes there has been race-mixing, yes there has been plastic surgery, but the average person can discern between different ethnic populations using nothing but phenotypic analysis (in this case, simply looking at somebody).
Other than skin colour, there are measurable differences in the mean dimensions of the skull and facial features. These include the nasal index, prognathism, shape of eye orbits, surface area of the lips and eyebrow ridges, among others. When we do nothing but look at an individual, our brains instantly recognise these differences even though we don't take out a tape measurer and compare the differences in millimeters of each aspect of the skull. Our brains are innately wired to recognise these differences in individuals. This is why, for example, we can instantly recognise an albino - there is a fuck up between the genes responsible for their skin colour and the genes responsible for the rest of their phenotype. This is also why you can look at female twins and find one more attractive than the other even though there would probably be a 0% chance of you coherently explaining why.
What you are doing, and what most people do when discussing race, is hone in on the exceptions while ignoring the general. If you live in a homogeneous town in Poland for 6 months, and then live in a homogeneous town in Denmark for 6 months, you will be exposed to both phenotypes long enough to be able to tell the differences between the two ethnic populations with a more than random accuracy by only looking at their face. This is meaningful because both populations, in the social sphere, will be classified as "Caucasian" or "Europid" or "White" and yet a phenotypic difference will still exist among the sub-divisions of this one genetic cluster. This relates to my point earlier, where I said you can further divide these sub-divisions.
Apply this to between populations rather than within populations and the phenotypic differences will be even greater - unsurprisingly so, because the further away the genetic clusters are away from each other, the more different their phenotype. Yes, I get it, there are Persians who look Afghan and there are Persians who look Greek. However, Persian, just like "White" or "Black" are socially constructed ever-evolving terms but this does not mean that phenotypic differences are arbitrary and random. -
2018-02-18 at 10:26 PM UTC in KREAYSHAWN DROPS FREESTYLE TO THE HATERS DISRESPECTING WOMENThis kike snowbunny fell off. From gucci gucci to 85k views in 2 months. Poor form fam.
-
2018-02-18 at 10:19 PM UTC in Policeman beheaded and son has heart/skin removed while alive
Originally posted by Jeremus I didn't even dispute that, cockfag. In fact I specifically pointed that out. That's simply not the issue under debate. The issue is whether or not "race" as it is seen now is a useful idea. It is not. There is no such thing as the "white race" or the "black race". Two "white" people from different populations such as from an Anglo background and the far Eastern reaches of Russia, who both evolved to achieve white skin, might have just as many differences in their genetics as either of those two and a sub-Saharan nigger.
Again, no shit faggot. "A computer" will note differences in cluster analyses between populations and we can do the same within each individual population, and the lines will only get clearer as we move down to the individual level, not blurrier. For example, a biological family will have closer genes to one another than any member of the family does to the average other member of the next hierarchical level of population (such as their city). We can play this game up and down the block. Now you tell me where we draw the line and call it a race like "black" or "white". I'll wait.
So what you're saying is, you came into this thread with only a straw man and your dick in your hands? Because I never denied genetic clustering you cum encrusted phallus enthusiast: my dispute has always been taxonomical in nature and how it's not a relevant or useful concept. I literally made this clear in my very first post responding to you on this, so you're just tilting at windmills. Now go gargle Jean-Francois's balls till he finally cums out a coherent response to the actual contention I have.
This is Captain Falcon btw.
Oh, hey Captain Falcon. Thank you for agreeing with 90% of my post. From what I've gathered, you are admitting to genetic differences between populations but you don't want to use words to describe these genetic and (observable) phenotypic realities.
So you're chilling with bae. You go to the kitchen to make a sandwich. There's a knock on the door. Bae says "I'll get it!" and gets up to see who's at the door. A second later you hear a scream and you quickly run to bae to see what's going on. You see bae on the floor, in a pool of blood, choking. In horror, you look up at the doorway and see a gentleman standing there with a knife in his hands. He smiles at you and runs away.
You cry a little bit then call the police. The police come and comfort you a little bit. They ask you for a description of the perpetrator. You suddenly remember how useless taxonomic categories are in describing phenotypic differences which are caused by genetic markers among human populations.
"Uhh...it was...like...this guy...I mean...he was wearing a black...a black jacket..."
"Could you describe his appearance?"
"Um...he had like...black...uh...black hair...like uh...short, black hair."
"What else do you remember?"
"Uhh...he was like, uhh...my height, maybe...maybe a little taller."
"Okay. It's okay, take your time. What did his face look like?"
"Umm...you know...the guy, uhh...I think he uh...I mean, like I agree that...genetic differences, like, exist but..."
"Sorry? What do you mean? What did he look like?"
"He had um...like...points to leather sofa but like points to own face".
"I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying he was wearing a mask? A leather mask?"
"No, um...no...his face...uhh...it was...it was like...it looked like...like this sofa..."
"It looked like this sofa? This sofa is black. Are you saying he was Black?"
"Uhh...you know...I really don't think it's uh...useful to, uh..."
I'm literally dying here. You must be slightly assburgered right? You're saying the concept of race is useless because "White" encompasses many different ethnicities while "Black" also encompasses various different ethnicities. Apparently if you line up a bunch of Icelandic, French, Hungarian, Ukrainian people alongside a bunch of Nigerian, Ghanaian, Zambian, Ugandan people, the concept of race would be entirely useless because all this wonderful diversity only exists in computers running genetic clusters but has no practical applications in real life situations. lmfao. Okay, that's cool. Hey man, to each their own right? I'm sure we're not going to change each other's minds here anyway. You're a millionaire anyway bro, you ain't gotta do this. Have a good day bro! -
2018-02-18 at 9:29 PM UTC in People who talk like they're whining/crying all the time.
-
2018-02-18 at 9:27 PM UTC in Quitting weed due to noticeable drop in IQ
-
2018-02-18 at 12:47 PM UTC in Policeman beheaded and son has heart/skin removed while alive
Originally posted by Jeremus You are retarded. This is a very easy statement to make without following through on the actual logic: of course different peoples have different genes in their different populations. Of course. That's not remotely under debate. The issue is where you draw the line and call someone a different "race". If we're thinking on genetic lines, I haven't seen a single argument that doesn't make a far better case for saying there are 7 billion "races" (one for each person) than saying there are any races like "black" or "white".
Nigger, shut the fuck up. "Muh behavioural genetics" isn't an argument. Give me facts to shut down rather than your outraged alt-SJW cuck bullshit. This pussy whinging shit isn't new or edgy.
Yawn. Same old bullshit from the same old cucked out faggots. Nobody is saying the lines are not blurry. Just because you can divide the human population into 5 "sub-divisons" or 600 "sub-divisons" does not invalidate the reality of genetic markers of different populations clustering more closely or farther from each other. 7 billion races? Are you actually fucking brain dead or what? Do you realise that just because the human brain categorises an observable reality into "constructs" such as "race" does not deny the real FACT that DIFFERENCES between POPULATIONS exist when a computer does cluster analyses for the genetic data of human populations? All you faggots do is quibble over the semantics like "wat dus raec mean bro". Shut the fuck up you pretentious faggot. Nobody said anything about "Black" or "White" you simple limp-wristed cunt. Language is a blunt tool to communicate meaning. Frequency of genetic markers among different populations is an objective fact whether you are getting slaughtered by Scythians in 7th Century BC or whether you are masturbating to pictures of HTS in 2018. It exists whether you apply your propaganda to it or not you incapable-of-nuance lunatic. The fact that some geneticists choose to divide the human population into more or less sub-divisions does not invalidate "race" if we take "race" to simply mean a sub-divison in a population represented by the frequency of its genetic markers. Nobody gives a fuck about the blurry lines in the science you social sciences studying faggot. In fact, it's your lucky day today - I will give you the privilege of reading a 4 page report on this reality. https://web.stanford.edu/group/rosenberglab/papers/popstruct.pdf
Let me guess what you're gonna respond with - hurr durr nobody is denying this bleurghh where u draw da line broeeuleughh. Nobody is fucking dividing the races into White, Black (shades) then suddenly Asian (continent) then some other Australoid bullshit except faggots in their every day life because 99% of the population are not autistic and have to communicate some agreed upon meaning. Regardless, differences among populations exist - and that's why in my original post to Captain Falcon I was very specific with my words and said "different genes are selected for different populations evolving in different ecological climates while facing different selection pressures for tens of thousands of years". Not hurr durr blax are stoopid whites r superior. You "the population can be divided into 7 billion races" lunatic. -
2018-02-18 at 2:39 AM UTC in Policeman beheaded and son has heart/skin removed while alive
-
2018-02-18 at 2:31 AM UTC in Quitting weed due to noticeable drop in IQDay 4 of no weed. I slept for 4 hours last night. I have a lingering headache from the sleep deprivation and my dreams are fucked. Thank Yahweh it's the weekend. 4000-0 request to apprehend. If Bill Krozby quotes this post I will make him a grandfather
-
2018-02-18 at 2:22 AM UTC in Policeman beheaded and son has heart/skin removed while alive
Originally posted by Captain Falcon The way you act is a result of your genetics responding to the environment.
Captain Falcon the type of nigga to say shit like this while denying the objective, mathematical, consistent fact that different genes are selected for different populations evolving in different ecological climates while facing different selection pressures for tens of thousands of years.
You know nothing about behavioural genetics and you should probably shut the fuck up. You're okay but I cringe when you act like you've read past a Vox article written by a Black woman about human evolution. I know it's an imperative to deny genetic racial differences when you and all of your friends are Pakistani but your anecdotal experiences literally mean jack shit in the objective material world of biological organisms. The fact that you are blind to to something which can be concluded using nothing but inductive reasoning makes us all question the validity of your other "intellectual" claims.
"Didn't read" = I read it but I can't refute it. -
2018-02-17 at 6:14 AM UTC in When you haven't left your room for days, just go in virtual reality."dare to take the morning after pill fam?" - what Bill Krozby should have said instead of replicating his genes with a 2/10 rape victim
-
2018-02-17 at 6:03 AM UTC in ATTN: I’m One of Bill Krozby’s Victims - AMA
-
2018-02-17 at 5 AM UTC in sup cunts
-
2018-02-17 at 4:52 AM UTC in Spooks Still Updating Totse DomainStop updating the domain just so you could make a thread about this
-
2018-02-17 at 4:48 AM UTC in Quitting weed due to noticeable drop in IQGet the fuck out of this fantastic thread and take your overweight over the counter medicine addict friend with you. You're smelling the place up with your soon to be dead covered in shit animal
-
2018-02-17 at 4:25 AM UTC in sup cunts
