User Controls
Posts by Eval/Apply
-
2018-09-11 at 1:21 AM UTC in Adidas shoes special pricesquid vagina
-
2018-09-11 at 1:21 AM UTC in Adidas shoes special pricesquid penis
-
2018-09-11 at 1:21 AM UTC in Adidas shoes special pricesquid cunt
-
2018-05-02 at 4:19 AM UTC in So it begins. This is how the kikes will do "basic income".
-
2018-05-02 at 2:33 AM UTC in So it begins. This is how the kikes will do "basic income".
Originally posted by Hikikomori-Yume https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-30/facebook-co-founder-calls-tech-firm-data-tax-fund-data-dividend-all-americans
oy vey goyim!
you want free shekels?
you want to participate in our technocratic future?
GIVE ME ALL OF YOUR LIFE'S PERSONAL DATA AND YOUR MENTAL ENERGY IN EXCHANGE HEHEHEHE
Aren't you one of those "VR is the future" people? -
2018-05-01 at 2:33 PM UTC in My culture is not your prom dress!!!Can you believe all those african fucks wearing western style pants and shirts? Appropriating our culture like that, it disgusts me. We invented shirts and pants, the rest of the world is obligated to wear their traditional garb (usually some kind of robe) and they're hella racist if they don't. God, white man is so oppressed.
-
2018-05-01 at 2:27 PM UTC in The Retardest Thread: Fashionably Late Edition.niggers
-
2018-01-07 at 11:36 PM UTC in Intel fucks the world, again, surprising no one
Originally posted by -SpectraL The code fragment begins with a bounds check on x which is essential for security. In particular, this check prevents the processor from reading sensitive memory outside of array1. Otherwise, an out-of-bounds input x could trigger an exception or could cause the processor to access sensitive memory by supplying x = (address of a secret byte to read)−(base address of array1). Unfortunately, during speculative execution, the conditional branch for the bounds check can follow the incorrect path. For example, suppose an adversary causes the code to run such that:
• the value of x is maliciously chosen (and out-of-bounds) such that array1[x] resolves to a secret byte k somewhere in the victim’s memory;
• array1 size and array2 are not present in the processor’s cache, but k is cached; and
• previous operations received values of x that were valid, leading the branch predictor to assume the if will likely be true.
Right, I understand how you can get the branch predictor to speculatively read a byte of memory that violates the bounds check and get said byte of memory into the cache. How do you figure out what that byte is though? As the attacker you can't read the cache line holding that byte. -
2018-01-07 at 11:19 PM UTC in Oh, what's that, fag? You're a man of logic who needs "evidence" or "proof"?
Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, I will. But first, I'd like you to show me the mathematical probability of a nuclear warhead appearing by itself after millions, billions or even trillions of years. Like, one day there's no warhead there, and then, over the course of a tetrazillion years, one slowly starts to form, starts to pull itself together, and finally makes an appearance as a fully-working modern nuclear warhead. Lets see the actual probability numbers on that first. Don't you see how completely ludicrous that kind of theory is?
I've seen this argument many many times before. Let me save you some time: I'm of course going to say it's vanishingly unlikely to the point of being near certainty (although this still isn't mathematics). You're going to compare warheads to complex lifeforms like humans and say what goes for them goes for us.
Warheads are not biological systems with heritable traits. There is no theory of origin of warheads by evolution by natural selection. Biological systems however have the ability to reproduce and an acceptable balance between mutation and heritability. We have powerful explanation of how very very simple living systems can arise from non-living systems and how simple living systems can give rise to more complex descendants. We actually have experimental proof of the latter. No such theory exists for warheads, so the analogy squarely fails.
Now where's my math specy boy? -
2018-01-07 at 11:01 PM UTC in Intel fucks the world, again, surprising no one
Originally posted by -SpectraL
if (x < array1_size)
y = array2[array1[x] * 256];
In this example, the variable x contains attacker-controlled data. The if statement compiles to a branch instruction, whose purpose is to verify that the value of x is within a legal range, ensuring that the access to array1 is valid. For the exploit, the attacker first invokes the relevant code with valid inputs, training the branch predictor to expect that the if will be true. The attacker then invokes the code with a value of x outside the bounds of array1 and with array1 size uncached. The CPU guesses that the bounds check will be true, the speculatively executes the read from array2[array1[x] * 256] using the malicious x. The read from array2 loads data into the cache at an address that is dependent on array1[x] using the malicious x. The change in the cache state is not reverted when the processor realizes that the speculative execution was erroneous, and can be detected by the adversary to find a byte of the victim’s memory. By repeating with different values of x, this construct can be exploited to read the victim’s memory.
Interesting. How is the cache state detected? It seems like the attacking process can't read it directly since, even if it has changed as a product of speculative execution, it's still mapped to the victim processes' memory and any read of that memory by the attacker process will generate a fault. -
2018-01-07 at 10:56 PM UTC in Are Wedding Rings Cucky?Seems kinda fun to have a socially acceptable excuse for wearing jedielry. If I ever got married I'd probably do it for a while for the novelty of it then stop because it seems kinda annoying to always having to be keeping track of it and the song and dance that goes with losing it.
-
2018-01-07 at 10:46 PM UTC in What have you been playing lately?Is there a specific reason not to? All else being equal I couln't mind getting in a little listening practice while I paly.
-
2018-01-07 at 10:20 PM UTC in Intel fucks the world, again, surprising no one
Originally posted by -SpectraL https://spectreattack.com/spectre.pdf
if (x < array1_size)
y = array2[array1[x] * 256];
Hmmm, looks like some pretty complicated stuff. I didn't fully understand the paper. Do you think you could explain what that code does and how it fits into the spectre attack framework? -
2018-01-07 at 10:19 PM UTC in Oh, what's that, fag? You're a man of logic who needs "evidence" or "proof"?
Originally posted by -SpectraL More like I've just switched viewpoints, in order to offer criticism of his premise. If he truly believes it was "evolution", let's look at it from that angle then, and we quickly begin to see how that false premise breaks down almost immediately, upon closer inspection.
I'm not seeing where the theory of evolution breaks down though. It doesn't explain the origin of matter, so what? It's not a theory that aims to explain the origin of matter, it seeks to explain biological diversity. Saying evolution by natural selection "breaks down" at the problem of origin of matter is like saying quantum mechanics "breaks down" in explaining aesthetic preferences. Only someone with a very poor understanding of the theory would consider origin of matter a problem for it.For your viewpoint, I asked that we look at it mathematically. The odds of even a single one of nature's wonders happening by chance are innumerable, for all practical purposes, impossible, mathematically, and yet there are millions of similar systems where we are expected to wish the math away as inconsequential and meaningless.
You keep saying it's "mathematically impossible" but you haven't shown us even the faintest trace of mathematics. Why don't you select one of "nature's wonders", tell us how likely it is to have come about, and then show us the calculation that makes that estimation. -
2018-01-07 at 10:10 PM UTC in What have you been playing lately?Is there a Japanese audio option with English subs? I wouldn't be able to understand enough of the Japanese to play without them. If there is that's probably what I'll do. Hadn't really thought about it being a Japanese release originally
-
2018-01-07 at 10:01 PM UTC in Oh, what's that, fag? You're a man of logic who needs "evidence" or "proof"?
Originally posted by -SpectraL An evolution can only occur when one or more elements act upon one or more elements. So that means there has to be at least two elements, or more, for this evolution of yours to progress. And yet you've not explained how the (at least) two source elements made an appearance, and you expect us to believe these elements just popped out of thin air and birthed themselves into existence.
Now this is an entirely different argument than "too unlikely to happen". Did you give up on the complexity issue or did you just get distracted? -
2018-01-07 at 9:59 PM UTC in Oh, what's that, fag? You're a man of logic who needs "evidence" or "proof"?
-
2018-01-07 at 9:03 PM UTC in Oh, what's that, fag? You're a man of logic who needs "evidence" or "proof"?
-
2018-01-07 at 7:57 PM UTC in So, Word On The Street Is, Lanny Bans Silently & For No Reason...
Originally posted by -SpectraL Please don't lie, kid. If what you say really was true, why hasn't Bill Krozby been banned for the dozens of non-SG threads he's made since his last one week ban? I mean, you banned him a shit ton of times for "posting in the wrong forum", but now that's magically OK and no more bans for him??
He's gotten somewhat better, maybe just as a function having given up on posting topical threads at all.
Also, seeing as I apparently have to fight your faggots on this, I'm almost at the point of preferring to live a disorganized shithole incapable of having an on-topic thread to having to babysit an alcoholic rapist man-child on a daily basis.
Originally posted by Grimace I will vouch that DEWALT is not scron. He is mrasbestos and mrasbestos is a treasure. Please unban.
Done, DEWALT account is unbanned.
Originally posted by Bill Krozby Fyi i never posted in sg "to be a shit" i post in sg because this site is so small anyways and i just personally like dealing with one sub forum anyways plus a lot of you guys dont visit the other sub forums anyways.
So you knew what you were doing was against the rules, you just didn't like them so you didn't follow them. Fine. I've not liked rules in the past too, you don't have to agree with the rules, you don't even have to follow them. But I baffled that anyone is surprised when repeatedly and deliberately breaking a rule after a dozen warnings to stop gets you banned. -
2018-01-07 at 7:24 PM UTC in Oh, what's that, fag? You're a man of logic who needs "evidence" or "proof"?
