User Controls
Posts by BOSS
-
2017-06-08 at 9:12 PM UTC in Hello,
-
2017-06-08 at 6:32 PM UTC in Hello,
Originally posted by bling bling u will make big bux from uk if u make mxe
ketamine is still high price starting at 20 a gram cheapest
tekh gonna hit uk soon to
The problem with MXE is production and sales at scale, at a high quality standard. There is a lot of low quality supply in the market that drives the prices down, and makes it difficult to sell at scale, while maintaining profitability. I'm not sure there are any large operations dealing with MXE, specially in Europe. It's just not worth most people's time to try to compete with bad product, because people will naturally begin to sacrifice quality for quantity. There's not much we can do if they want to inject unsettled reagents into their bloodstream. We produce regular ketamine at certain times of the year though. -
2017-06-08 at 4:17 PM UTC in Hello,
-
2017-06-08 at 1:23 PM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)I would also like to point out that one billion is equivalent to one thousand million, not one hundred million.
Originally posted by AltarEgo And the fight wouldnt be against 1.5 billion mudslimes. They dont let their women do shit and they sure as hell wont train them to fight in fear that they will turn against their owners. So its more like 75 million muslims. But many of those will be children and only good for suicide bombing. So basically we are talking about an army of 45 million towelheads against the America, Canada, the european states, Russia, China and numerous other world powers.
I wouldnt be surprised if the west went full phillipene presiden on them and legalized killing muslims on sight. Muslims stand no chance without cia backing.
You are mistaken by one order of magnitude. -
2017-06-08 at 1:15 PM UTC in Hello,
Originally posted by infinityshock false
Do field agents carry handcuffs?
I've never heard of the FBI performing a sting or a bust without local law enforcement, and it's usually the locals police or seat or whoever that appears to be performing the actual arrests. I have seen a couple of raids that took place in the US, it appeared that a handful of federal agents will come in to direct local law enforcement. It could just be the ones I've seen though.
Could you tell me what circumstances a federal agent would perform an arrest themselves? -
2017-06-08 at 1:08 PM UTC in Our VOICESIt's interesting, I can usually discern whether or not someone is a drug addict or has a drug problem based on their voice. I do not do business with addicts unless they pay up front, and their voice is a good first indicator that they might be an addict.
-
2017-06-08 at 12:43 PM UTC in Hello,
Originally posted by infinityshock I want to use your handcuffs (do they let the desk jockeys have handcuffs?) to bind you into the lithotomy position and play 'let's see what fits' with the assorted foreign objects in your cubicle.
As far as I know, federal agents don't use cuffs. That would be for whatever local law enforcement they coordinate with, to handle. -
2017-06-08 at 12:41 PM UTC in Hello,
-
2017-06-08 at 11:22 AM UTC in Hello,
-
2017-06-08 at 11:21 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
-
2017-06-08 at 6:32 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)AltarEgo, thank you for giving me a platform with which to address each of the arguments you raised, even if they were in bad faith.
-
2017-06-08 at 6:29 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by AltarEgo Bad faith is better than no faith biiitch. I see you as an idiot since you keep trying to make arguments using "tautology" and philosophic name dropping.
Btw you have been responding to a drunk shitposter who doesnt give a fuck about how structured your argument is. You are a fucking moron for actually responding to me.
Suck my metaphysical dick you dense piece of shit. You are wrong in your assessment of islam and absolutely incoherent in your dissmisal of spiritual thought.
I'm glad you can admit that you're wrong. That's the first step to not being wrong, and possibly to being right. -
2017-06-08 at 6:27 AM UTC in Hello,
-
2017-06-08 at 6:25 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by AltarEgo The writings of the philokalia, the catechism, various daoist and buddhist texts on meditation and metaphysics, texts from bon, the entire jedi faith, islamic tradition, discordian principles, the bhagvad gita, and myriad other spiritual writings disagree.
Of course doctrines that assert themselves as being complete ways of life for their followers will seek to assert themselves over their followers' complete ways of life. This is tautologically true.
But that is not the issue nor the claim. Your reasoning is circular. The fact is that religious thought can exist alongside rational thought. That is definitionally what the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance allows for. If spiritual thought could not coexist with non-spiritual thought or with secular thought, we wouldn't, for example, have anyone transitioning from religion to atheism. We have direct, observable and experimental proof of this in action; of any of the faiths involved with the texts you mentioned, you will find secular members in modern western society. For example, all the Christians who partake in premarital sex and so on.
You are trying to argue against reality. -
2017-06-08 at 6:16 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by AltarEgo What is the moderate vs extremist interpretation of "create a global islamic caliphate"?
You are begging the question; there is no reason to believe that a moderate Muslim's interpretation of Islam includes the establishment of a global caliphate as an end goal.
Post last edited by BOSS at 2017-06-08T06:26:11.261360+00:00 -
2017-06-08 at 6:15 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by AltarEgo Damn. You just went full retard. Liberal values are certianlt not rational.
And yes there is a difference between classical liberalism and modern liberal values. The former being rationally based and the latter being a socially suicidal mentality.
I am in fact referring to classical liberalism. This eliminates your criticism in your post.
You are clearly arguing in bad faith and deliberately ignoring the principle of charity.
http://philosophy.lander.edu/oriental/charity.html
That is why your arguments are so easy to dismiss, despite my attempts to be as charitable as possible with them. -
2017-06-08 at 6:10 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by AltarEgo Basically you can sieve the extremists out all you want but no matter what at some stage a moderate will conclude that extremist doctrine is the only means to achieve the end goal of islam. So essentially as much as you try to separate wheat from chaff the chaff is too long the wheat too dense and your shears too dull.
If the moderates have a moderate view of Islam then their view of Islam's goals will be moderate and therefore will not lead to radicalisation. This is tautologically true. -
2017-06-08 at 6:08 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by AltarEgo Haha what a fucking mong. Still trying to rationalize. It is obvious to any observer that my point in superior and yours inferior. You cannot separate the spiritual thoughts from other thoughts as spiritual people see thought as inherently spiritual.
If you feel the need to proclaim that you're right rather than letting your points stand for themselves, you are probably wrong. Secondly, the presence of spiritual thought does not mean that the person must view all thoughts through a spiritual lens. There is simply no reason to believe that. -
2017-06-08 at 6:06 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by AltarEgo Hahaha look at this faggot. He thinks that he can generalize the west. He thinks he determines who is rational. What a fucking moron.
Here is another protip. Humans are not rational. Society isnt rational. Carl Scheele found hella elements but died of mercury poisoning because he likes tasting his discoveries. Pythagoras died over some fucking beans. Alan turing was a fag. None of that is rational but all of these people contributed loads more than you ever will.
No, humans are not perfectly rational machines. But we can do our best. Most of society's liberal values have emerged through thought that has been conducted by the use of methods of rationality. For example, the use of Kant's categorical imperative can establish many of our current western ideals of freedom and individual liberties and protections. If we view western society as being our ideal standard (which is, simply speaking, tautologically true) then we can establish what Western ideals mean in a broad sense. That's not a problem at all. -
2017-06-08 at 6:02 AM UTC in National Anti-Muslim Day (US)
Originally posted by mmQ To be fair there are no lack of verses that do support the abolishment of Old Testament law.
Romans 7:6 ESV
But now we are released from the law, having died to that which held us captive, so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code.
–
Again as I've said it's all complete pick and choose, in a book that claims God is not the author of confusion.
I believe those were the words of Paul, whereas the quoted section from Matthew are supposed to be a direct quote from Christ. But I understand and agree with your point, it just seems that from the most literal interpretation of the Bible, "Old Testament still applies" definitely seems to win out.