Originally posted by AngryIVer
A dislike button of sorts would be nice. It's not enough to just not thank people, sometimes you gotta let them know they are wrong.
You know what would be really awesome feature here? like a feature where you could like reply to their post and stuff with text, and make statements about their posts and that sort of thing.
And they could make it so you could put like these little facepalm pictures in it and stuff.
That would be a great feature to implement here, don't you think?
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Vitamin G
I actually used to complain to hydro that I wanted to lose weight when I was like 160 because I had body image issues. Mind you, she was still like 200 and when I met her she was pushing 250.
Holy shit how fat would you have to be yourself before you'd lower yourself to banging a chick who was 250lbs?
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
if you know the name of a hot girl who works in an office, have it loaded on a flash drive. write on the flash 'jane sex tape' or whatever the chicks name is. then leave it laying around the car park at lunch time or first thing in the morning. half the office wouldn't be able to resist checking that out as soon as poss.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
Federal Courts In federal court, the Bail Reform Act of 1984 dictates when a judge can deny bail based on a defendant’s dangerousness. Generally, protective detentions are allowed in the federal system only for defendants charged with certain crimes. These crimes include:
crimes of violence crimes with a maximum penalty of life in prison or death drug offenses that carry at least ten years in prison any felony, where the defendant has at least two prior qualifying felony convictions, and felonies that involve minor victims, possession or use of weapons, or failure to register as a sex offender. (18 U.S.C.A. § 3142(e) & (f)(1) (2016).) Being charged with one of these offenses only makes a defendant eligible for denial of bail. To actually deny bail, the judge must also find by clear and convincing evidence that there aren’t any conditions of release that could protect the public. In making this call, a judge is supposed to consider:
the nature and circumstances of the charges the seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant the strength of the prosecution’s evidence against the defendant the defendant’s criminal history, and personal characteristics of the defendant. Relevant personal characteristics might include things like substance abuse and mental health history, employment, and family ties. (18 U.S.C.A. § 3142(g) (2016).)
A judge who decides to deny bail must include the reasons for the denial in a written order. A defendant can then appeal the decision to a higher court. But the chances of winning the appeal are usually pretty slim. (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 3142(i), 3145 (2016).)
they will also consider if the accussed has the resources to easily flee the country, including money and connections, especially if known to have connections abroad.
i mean how many friends in the movie industry would this guy have with their own boats and planes?
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Common De-mominator
Tch, nigga fuck you. All your life choices are the best possible choices ever because you rationalize yourself into believing that.
You should just cut out all the bullshit and try to get an abandoned shipping container and use pallets to accent that.
not everyone is you captain faggot, not everybody wants what you want in life, not everybody wants to be a stuck up there own ass, arrogant, desperate to be seen as better than everybody else, male version of paris hilton, hardcore fucking faggot poser idiot, like you do falcon.
lol
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
theres loads of micro homes vids on yt that you could watch. i've seen better ones that those an all, just don't have time to look through them all right now tho.
.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Common De-mominator
The EU is a great project and anyone who opposes it right now is probably brain damaged.
Maybe its a great project for you and would suit you and your lifestyle. But like I pointed out to you in the other Fred yesterday, you're thinking and logic always applies on the assumption that everyone is inherently like you and thinks like you and always want the same as what you want.
In the real world everyone is different and different things are important to different people and they all want different things. So you have millions of differing ideas on what's right and wrong. Hence we get many people who find the EU works for them and their personal situation, and many for whom the EU doesn't work well at all.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Obbe
This youtube channel has lots of information you may find helpful for living off the grid.
they do some cool shit in those primitive technology vids. did you see the swimming pool they built? and filled it up with buckets of water carried up from the river, lol.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
my first full time job was in a factory making pallets. when i was 14 i bunked off school for a week, lied about my age and got the job. it was fucking boring tho so i never went back after the first week, lol.
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
